Purpose: To compare the result of mid-shaft fracture radius and ulna treated by small DCP and LCP.
Methods: Prospective interventional study, done in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 250 Bedded General Hospital, Tangail from January, 2017 to December, 2018. The study was carried out with sample size 30 patients of mid-shaft fracture of radius and ulna. Out of them 15 were treated by DCP and screws and 15 patients were treated by LCP and screws.
Results: In this study mean age in group I was 32.63±9.42 and in group II was 37.54+7.12. Male patients were 17 and female were 13 in number. Motor vehicle accident was the commonest cause of fracture found in 60% in group-I and 73.33% in group-II. In group-I, out of 15 cases all cases (100%) united with mean time of 15.87 ± 3.89 weeks. In group-II, out of 15 cases all (100%) cases united with the mean time of 14.0 ± 2.27 weeks. There was no major complication in both groups. Regarding the final outcome, excellent results in group-I were achieved with 11 (73.33%) cases while in group-II with 12 (80.00%) cases. Satisfactory results were seen in 04 (26.67%) cases in group-I and 03 (20.00%) cases in group-II.
Conclusion: On the statistical point of view there was no significant difference between dynamic compression plate group and locking compression plate group for the treatment of mid-shaft fracture radius and ulna.
J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, December 2019, Vol.11(2); 106-109
Introduction: Tibia fractures are the most common long bone fractures encountered by the orthopedic surgeons and distal tibia fractures have the second highest incidence of all tibia fractures after the middle third of tibia the distal tibial fractures are unique and are considered as most challenging fractures to treat due to its proximity to the ankle joint and its superficial nature. The objective of this study is to compare two osteosynthesis systems developed for surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures: the intramedullary nailing and the MIPO technique.
Methods: The study was conducted between Jan 2018 to Dec 2019. 30 patients with extraarticular distal tibia fracture treated with intramedullary nailing and MIPO technique were reviewed retrospectively and clinical outcome was evaluated according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score.
Results: 15 patients were treated with intramedullary nail and 15 with MIPO technique. Fibular fixation was done in cases where fibular fracture was at or below the level of tibial fractures. We found no difference in terms of time for fracture union, mal-union, non-union, duration of surgery and amount of blood loss. But there was significant difference in terms of infection and duration of hospital stay. Also weight bearing was possible much earlier in intramedullary group as compared to the MIPO group.
Conclusion: Thus we conclude that intramedullary nailing is better choice of implant in patients with extra- articular distal tibia fractures and helps in early weight bearing and ambulation of patient with fewer complications.
J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, December 2020, Vol.12(1); 33-37
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.