IntroductionMeasurement of serum digoxin concentrations before steady-state is reached results in a falsely low concentration, and may affect treatment safety. We evaluated the proportion of serum digoxin measurements performed before steady-state is reached and the reasons for inappropriate sampling in hospitalized patients.Materials and methodsElectronic medical records of patients hospitalized between January 2011 and December 2015 treated with oral digoxin, that had more than one digoxin measurement were included. Serum digoxin measurements performed before achievement of pharmacological steady state were considered as inappropriate. The chi-square and chi-square for trend tests were used to analyse the relationship between inappropriate measurements and age, gender, diagnosis, inpatient service, serum digoxin, potassium and creatinine concentrations.ResultsWe evaluated 2065 hospital admissions for 1621 patients and 11,407 digoxin measurements. The time between consecutive measurements was 1.9 ± 2.4 days and 97% of all measurements were classified as inappropriate. There was no releationship between patient age, gender, serum creatinine concentration and inappropriate measurement. As opposed to expected, inappropriate digoxin measurement was higher when potassium concentrations were within the normal range (P = 0.025). Share of inappropriate determinations of digoxin was higher when concentrations > 2.6 nmol/L were recorded (P < 0.05). These measurements were requested most often in coronary care unit and cardiology department.ConclusionsIn our study, inappropriate serum digoxin measurement was found to be very high although only one of the appropriateness criteria was evaluated. The findings reveal the need for some strategies to prevent inappropriate measurements and reduce costs.

No abstract

Background Generic drug (GD) use is affected by many factors, including physicians’ approach. Objective This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, opinions and attitudes of primary care physicians (PCPs) about GDs and potentially associated factors. Methods An adequately representative sample (n = 354) of PCPs was determined via stratified and simple random sample selection method in this descriptive, cross-sectional study. The research data were collected through a face-to-face 40-item survey, where the knowledge, opinions and attitudes about GDs were questioned. The prescribing percentage of GDs overall was also examined. Results The survey was completed by 305 PCPs (mean age: 49.2 ± 7.9 years; 57.4% male). The rate of correct responses about GDs was 67.6% for basic knowledge and 46.6% for the development process. The percentages of PCPs who declared that GDs were ‘less efficacious’, ‘of lower quality’ and ‘less safe’ than original drugs were 65.2%, 53.4% and 35.4%, respectively. More than half (60.3%) of the PCPs declared not to pay attention to whether the drug is generic while prescribing. It was observed that, as the knowledge level of the physicians increased, negative opinions and prescribing attitudes regarding the effectiveness, quality and safety of the GDs decreased. The rate of GD prescribing (51.6%) in Izmir was lower than the rest of the country (54.6%; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion This study shows that the knowledge of PCPs about GDs is generally inadequate, which reflects negatively on their opinions and attitudes regarding the use of GDs. Educational activities can help establish awareness that GDs can be used without doubt of their effectiveness, quality and safety.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of and the risk factors for Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM), the drug groups most commonly evaluated as PIMs in elderly patients in the ICUs by using 2019 Beers Criteria, STOPP version 2 (v2) Criteria and EU(7)-PIM List. The relation between mortality rate and length of ICU stay with PIMs was also examined. Methods:This was a cross sectional study conducted on patients aged ≥65 years, treated in ICUs (n = 139) between June 8, 2020, and January 11, 2021. Patients' demographic characteristics, clinical data and laboratory findings about the drugs used were collected prospectively. PIMs were evaluated according to each of the criteria applied. Relationship of dependent and independent variables was evaluated using chi-square analysis, t-test and logistic regression analysis. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results:The number of patients with at least 1 PIM according to three criteria was 118 (84.9%) (80.6%, 59.7%, 48.2%, Beers, STOPP/v2 and EU(7)-PIM List, respectively).In the univariate analysis, receiving renal replacement therapy and high number of drugs were the covariates that significantly affected the presence of PIM according to all three criteria (P < .05). Combined use of anxiolytics and opioids in Beers Criteria (58.3%), antipsychotics (26.6%) in STOPP/v2 Criteria, and antiarrhythmics (23.7%) in EU(7)-PIM List were the drugs that caused PIM at most. No relationship was found between the presence of PIM and mortality. The length of ICU stay was determined significantly longer in the presence of PIM according to Beers Criteria (P = .028). Conclusions:In this study, the prevalence of PIM was determined higher in elderly patients in ICU. Our results supported that 2019 Beers Criteria for ICU patients seems to be more directive in detecting PIMs and determining the prognosis. Reducing the number of drugs administered may be the first step to decrease PIMs in elderly patients in ICU and to maintain the treatment safely.

ObjectivesOur previous retrospecive study evaluating the appropriateness of serum digoxin concentration (SDC) measurements revealed errors in the timing of blood specimen collection in 98% of the tests. The aim of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness of the SDC measurements and the factors involved in inappropriate test-ordering, after training health personnel in digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring.MethodsThis is a training-based quasi-experimental study. The residents and nurses of the Cardiology Clinic were trained first in December 2017, and refresher training courses were carried out every month throughout the study. The medical data of the inpatients receiving digoxin therapy were recorded prospectively, between January and December 2018. The appropriateness of the physicians’ orders for SDC measurement was evaluated according to the criteria of the right indication and right timing of blood collection. The results are presented by descriptive statistics, Student’s t-test and χ2 analysis.ResultsA total of 232 SDC tests were ordered for 121 patients (age: 71.0±12.6 years, 56.2% women). Of these orders,129 (55.6%) were considered appropriate: 205 (88.4%) for indication and 129 (62.9%) for blood collection timing. There was a significant correlation between inappropriate order for SDC test and the age of the patient, female gender, impairment of renal function tests, high levels of serum BNP and the number of medications used (P<0.005).ConclusionsApproximately a one-half decrease in inappropriate tests compared with our previous study results imply that education has a positive effect on physician behaviour. However, physicians’ concerns due to increased risk factors for the patient still play a role in inappropriate test-ordering.