Objective: The present study aimed to compare the qualitative (time intensity curve analysis), the semi-quantitative and the quantitative multiphase 3T dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters as predictors of malignancy in adnexal masses. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, women with an adnexal mass who were scheduled for surgical resection or were followed for more than one year period to confirm the benignity of their lesions, underwent multiphase 3T DCE-MRI. The qualitative (time intensity curve), semi-quantitative (SImax, SIrel, WIR) and quantitative (Ktrans, Kep, Vb) analyses were performed on DCE-MRI sequences and their predictive values were compared. Results: A total of 17 benign and 14 malignant lesions were included. According to the qualitative analysis, none of the lesions with Type I time intensity curves (TIC) were malignant and none of the masses with Type III TICs were benign. The accuracy of the quantitative parameters in detection of malignancy was found to be higher than that of semi-quantitative variables, particularly when calculated for a small ROI within the high signal area of the mass (sROI) rather than the largest ROI including the whole mass (lROI), and when inter-MRI variations were omitted using ratios. The Kep(tumor)/Kep(myometrium) ratio measured from sROI was the best parameter for differentiating a malignant lesion with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92.3%. Conclusion: We concluded that a Type I TIC confirms a benign lesion, and a type III TIC confirms the malignancy and further evaluation is not recommended for these lesions. So complementary quantitative analysis is only recommended for adnexal masses with type II TICs.

Objective:Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in the female population, and imaging studies play a critical role for its early detection. Mammographic breast density (MBD) is one of the markers used to predict the risk stratification of breast cancer in patients. We aimed to assess the correlations among MBD, ultrasound breast composition (USBC), fibroglandular tissue (FGT), and the amount of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in magnetic resonance imaging, after considering the subjects’ menopausal status.Methods:In this retrospective cross-sectional study, the medical records’ archives in a tertiary referral hospital were reviewed. Data including age, menopausal status, their mammograms, and ultrasound assessments were extracted from their records. All of their imaging studies were reviewed, and MBD, USBC, FGT, and BPE were determined, recorded, and entered into SPSS software for analysis.Results:A total of 121 women (mean age = 42.7 ± 11.0 years) were included, of which 35 out of 115 (30.4%) had reached menopause. Using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test for evaluating the trends among above mentioned 4 radiologic characteristics in the total sample population, a significant positive relation was found between each of these paired variables: (1) USBC-MBD (P = .006), (2) FGT-MBD (P = .001), (3) USBC-BPE (P = .046), (4) USBC-FGT (P = .036), and (5) BPE-FGT (P < .001). These trends were not found to be significant among premenopausal subjects.Conclusions:Considering the trends between different measures of breast density in the 3 radiologic modalities, these factors can be used interchangeably in certain settings.

Objective The aim of this study was to compare ultrasound (US) and intra uterine MRI (IUMRI) of the brain in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities. Methods The present systematic review is done based on guidelines for preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analysis. All major articles comparing fetal US with IUMRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities were qualified. Articles published before 2010 were excluded from the study. An I2 > 20% was considered as a sign of significant change. The statistical analysis was done using STATA −15 and Meta‐Disk 1.4 applications. Results Five articles were considered for meta‐analysis. The sensitivity of US and IUMRI in diagnosing fetal abnormalities were 86% and 95%, respectively. The corresponding rates for specificity were 77% and 80%. IUMRI and US were concordant in 72.5% (95% CI: 68%–77%) of diagnoses. However, IUMRI added information in 21.7% of cases, while US added value was only 1.48. Conclusion Our results approved the good diagnostic performance of both US and IUMRI in confirming fetal brain normal development and emphasized that US is an appropriate screening technique in pregnancy. In cases of detected abnormalities in US, IUMRI is suggested as it was the most accurate imaging method and added information about the diagnosis in 22.2% of cases.

Objective: We investigated the correlations between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and MRI interpretations with respect to short-interval follow-ups and biopsy rates. Methods: All accessible MRI examinations from 128 women during a limited time period in 2016 were evaluated. A blinded radiologist visually categorized BPE as minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. A BI-RADS category was also assigned. We used descriptive statistics to report the findings and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to compare categories. Results: Prevalence of minimal, mild, moderate, and marked BPE was 14.1%, 43.0%, 32.0%, and 10.9%, respectively. The short-interval follow-up rates were 22.2%, 27.3%, 26.8%, and 7.1% in women with minimal, mild, moderate, and marked BPE, respectively. BPE was not associated with the short-interval follow-up rate (p-value = 0.477). Biopsy rates were 22.2%, 27.3%, 22.0%, and 57.1% in women with minimal, mild, moderate, and marked BPE, respectively. Although there was no significant relationship between biopsy rates and BPE levels (p-value = 0.095) in the total population, these two factors were significantly associated in premenopausal women (p-value = 0.023) and in women of 30 -39 years (p-value = 0.001). Conclusion: Higher BPE does not correlate with short-interval follow-up rates, but appears to be related to biopsy rate, thus causing false-positives and unnecessary biopsy recommendations, particularly in younger, premenopausal women.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the additional value of fetal neurosonography (NS) and fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in fetuses at risk for brain anomalies. Materials and Methods: This systematic review article was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. On January 30, 2021, a systematic search was conducted using Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, with no language restrictions. The purpose was to identify all articles comparing NS with fetal MRI, in cases of suspected brain abnormalities. The statistical analysis was performed using STATA-15 and Meta-Disk 1.4 software. Results: Eight articles were included in this review. The overall agreement rate between NS and MRI was 81%. Data from NS changed the management of 6% of patients, and MRI data added data to the results of NS, in 9% of cases. In cases where the fetal MRI was normal, the added value of the postnatal MRI was 4%. Conclusion: When brain abnormalities are suspected, based on NS, MRI can play a significant role in the diagnostic path by clarifying the findings and significantly increasing the detection of abnormalities, especially when abnormalities are suspected in the posterior, midline, or cortical areas of the brain.

No abstract

Background: Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) potentially correlates with breast cancer (BC). Thus, BPE may be used for BC risk stratification and for monitoring chemo-prevention. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the BPE patterns in benign and malignant breast lesions and in pre-menopausal and postmenopausal women. Methods: In 2017, 128 consecutive pre-menopausal or post-menopausal patients underwent breast MRI with different indications were examined. Subjects with the history of breast surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy were excluded. A 1.5 Tesla device was used with the same protocol, and a blinded radiologist visually assessed and categorized breast BPE as minimal, mild, moderate, and marked. We used frequency distribution, mean, and standard deviation to report the findings. Comparing age or BPE in categorical variables, we appropriately used ANOVA, or Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results:The mean (± standard deviation) age was 42.43 (± 10.82) years, and 89 (69.5%) patients were hormonally active. Eighteen (14.1%), 55 (43.0%), 41 (32.0%), and 14 (10.9%) patients were classified as having minimal, mild, moderate, and marked BPE, respectively. Age did not change among BPE levels (P = 0.197). Prevalence of moderate and marked BPE was higher in pre-menopausal women. BPE was not associated with breast lesion histopathology (P value = 0.857) in pre-menopausal or post-menopausal women (P = 0.790, and 0.840, respectively). Conclusions: BPE is a measure of breast tissue hormonal activity, and it is not correlated with histopathological diagnosis of breast lesion in both pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women. The data of this study do not support the use of BPE for BC risk estimation.

Objective: The aim of this study was to suggest a new sonographic sign, which could be helpful in the determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancies, during the second and third trimesters. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study evaluating the sonographic images of 50 women with twin pregnancy. Out of 50 twin pregnancy case reviewed, only 27 were included. Those patient cases that were included were scanned by a single radiologist. The presence of a hypoechoic cleft, in the thickness of placental bulk, could be detected in all of the dichorionic pregnancy cases. This sonographic appearance was referred to as the “cleft sign.” Results: The “cleft sign” was present in all the dichorionic diamniotic (DC-DA) twin pregnancy cases, but no similar appearance was seen in the monochorionic diamniotic (MC-DA) twins. Considering this sign, the radiologist was able to correctly diagnose the chorionicity of all 24 patients in the second and third trimester. Conclusion: The findings of the present study suggest a possible role for this newly identified “cleft sign.” This sonographic appearance is a hypoechoic cleft in the thickness of placenta, of dichorionic pregnancies, as an indicator of DC twin pregnancy. In this retrospective case analysis, the “cleft sign” was diagnostically significant in the second and third trimesters.