Objectives This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of the multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) following COVID-19 in five different geographical regions of Iran. Methods In this multicenter observational study, patients <21 years were included between March 2020 and October 2021. By Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) checklist, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory and radiology findings, and treatment were collected. Statistical analysis was using Chi-square and t-test in STATA14. Results In total 225 patients with median age of 55 (26–96) months were included that 59.56% boys. 57.33% were admitted to the PICU with a median of 7 days (4–10). 95.56% of patients were discharged with recovery and the rest died. All of the patients in our study were included based on the MIS-C criteria. However, some patients had Kawasaki symptoms, so we compared the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the two groups. Conjunctival injection, cervical lymphadenopathy>1.5 cm diameter, and strawberry tongue in Kawasaki-like MIS-C patients were higher than of MIS-C patients, and this difference was significant(p<0.001). The most common comorbidity was obesity (24.86%). Most patients tested for COVID-19 and about 60% of the patients had a positive test by serology or reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Gastrointestinal (88.89%) and hematologic signs (84.44%) were most common. Most drugs used in patients were IVIG and steroids. 88.07% and 61.29% of the patients had at least one problem in echocardiography and lung CT, respectively. Conclusions The best outcome was seen in patients who were treated with both IVIG and steroids on the first days of admission. Myocarditis was common in two groups of patients. According to most patients had echocardiography abnormal, screening of heart function is recommended for patients.

BackgroundIvermectin which was widely considered as a potential treatment for COVID-19, showed uncertain clinical benefit in many clinical trials. Performing large-scale clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of this drug in the midst of the pandemic, while difficult, has been urgently needed.MethodsWe performed two large multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of ivermectin in treating inpatients and outpatients with COVID-19 infection. The intervention group received ivermectin, 0.4mg/kg of body weight per day for 3 days. In the control group, placebo tablets were used for 3 days.ResultsData for 609 inpatients and 549 outpatients were analyzed. In hospitalized patients, complete recovery was significantly higher in the ivermectin group (37%) compared to placebo group (28%; RR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.04–1.66]; p-value = 0.02). On the other hand, the length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the ivermectin group with a mean of 7.98 ± 4.4 days compared to the placebo receiving group with a mean of 7.16 ± 3.2 days (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.15–1.45]; p-value = 0.02). In outpatients, the mean duration of fever was significantly shorter (2.02 ± 0.11 days) in the ivermectin group versus (2.41 ± 0.13 days) placebo group with p value = 0.020. On the day seventh of treatment, fever (p-value = 0.040), cough (p-value = 0.019), and weakness (p-value = 0.002) were significantly higher in the placebo group compared to the ivermectin group. Among all outpatients, 7% in ivermectin group and 5% in placebo group needed to be hospitalized (RR, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.65–2.84]; p-value = 0.41). Also, the result of RT-PCR on day five after treatment was negative for 26% of patients in the ivermectin group versus 32% in the placebo group (RR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.60–1.09]; p-value = 0.16).ConclusionOur data showed, ivermectin, compared with placebo, did not have a significant potential effect on clinical improvement, reduced admission in ICU, need for invasive ventilation, and death in hospitalized patients; likewise, no evidence was found to support the prescription of ivermectin on recovery, reduced hospitalization and increased negative RT-PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 5 days after treatment in outpatients. Our findings do not support the use of ivermectin to treat mild to severe forms of COVID-19.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.irct.ir IRCT20111224008507N5 and IRCT20111224008507N4.

Background. Post-COVID-19 nephropathies have been reported profusely in the literature with diverse pathophysiological mechanisms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of transient distal (type 1) renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) in an infant with confirmed COVID-19. Case Presentation. We describe a 32-day-old female with diarrhea and fever without respiratory complaints. Her weight, height, and head circumference were normal for age. The primary lab test showed leukocytosis, neutrophilia, elevated inflammatory markers, and non-anion-gap metabolic acidosis. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and elevated SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin M confirmed COVID-19, while echocardiography and spiral chest computed tomography scan were normal. Intravenous fluid therapy and supportive care were initiated. Blood culture was positive for Klebsiella pneumoniae. Amikacin and cefotaxime were ordered. Although diarrhea and dehydration gradually improved, venous blood gas still showed metabolic acidosis. Due to the alkaline urine and hypokalemic-hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, dRTA was diagnosed. Notably, the patient dramatically responded to Shohl’s solution. Conclusions. Regarding the various manifestations of COVID-19, the possible association between dRTA and COVID-19 needs further investigation in children.

HCV co-infection is associated with higher mortality and morbidity in people with HIV (PWH). We aimed to characterize the epidemiology and factors associated with HCV co-infection among PWH in Iran. In this systematic review, we searched three English databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Embase) and two Farsi databases (Scientific Information Database, and Magiran) for studies that measured the prevalence of HCV co-infection among PWH, published between 2000 and January 1, 2021. We included studies with a minimum sample size of 5 PWH. Reviews, editorials, conference abstracts, theses, studies with no relevant data, and unclear serological assays were excluded. We summarized the HCV co-infection prevalence by random-effect meta-analysis and assessed the sources of heterogeneity by a meta-regression model. Of the 858 records identified, 69 eligible studies with 12996 PWH were included. Overall, HCV co-infection prevalence was 64% (95%CI 58–69). The prevalence was higher among older (mean age &gt;= 35y) PWH (69%, 95%CI 64-74), and PWH who inject drugs (77%, 95%CI 71-82). Furthermore, we found that co-infection was higher among studies conducted between 2000-2014 (67%, 95%CI 59-75) versus 2015-2020 (57%, 95%CI 50-64). The prevalence of HCV co-infection is high in Iranian PWH, with significant geographical variations. HCV screening and treatment among PWH are warranted to avoid the future burden of HCV-related liver damage, cancer, and mortality.

Background and objective: Breast cancer is the world's most common malignancy. Despite significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease, the associated mortality rate is still high. Tumor initiating cells known as cancer stem cells with unique abilities are suspected responsible for therapy failure and poor prognosis. Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5) is a cancer stem cell marker which promotes aggressive features in breast cancer cells. So, the aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate LGR5 as a therapeutic target for breast cancer. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using databases of Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. We searched these databases with LGR5 and Breast Cancer and related keywords based on mesh database until Oct12, 2021. All studies that reported the rate of LGR5 high expression with Immunohistochemistry in breast cancer patients were included in this review. We used the STATA and random effect model for data analysis. Results: Finally, 7 studies including 2632 breast cancer samples were studied. The pooled prevalence of LGR5 high expression in breast cancer was 36 % (CI95%: 26-47.5%, I2= 95.5) and in triple negative was 48.6% (CI95%: 38.4-58.7%, I2= 0.0). Conclusion: Our findings show that the rate of LGR5 high expression in breast cancer in general and especially in triple negative was considerable and it seems that this is a potential therapeutic target for breast cancer.

No abstract