No abstract

Background/purpose Previous studies have suggested that functional dominance in one part of the body can be correlated with functional dominance in another part. Thus, the present research aimed to determine whether brain laterality (handedness, footedness, earedness, and eyedness) was related to mixing ability and chewing side preference. Materials and methods Fifty-four volunteers who were not undergoing any form of dental treatment took part in this study. Self-defined brain laterality was determined through a questionnaire. The volunteers performed five tasks related to brain laterality, which was identified by the side used to perform three or more of the five tasks. Chewing side preference was determined by observing the main gum location on the occlusal area when volunteers chewed for 30 strokes. Mixing Ability Index (MAI) was measured by analyzing the degree of mixing of two differently colored waxes (height, 3 mm; diameter, 20 mm). Occlusion contact area was measured by taking the maximum intercuspation bite with polysiloxane. Results Thirty-nine volunteers (72%) showed significant agreement between brain dominance and chewing preference side. The association between brain dominance and MAI was not significant. The occlusal contact area of the dominant side (mean = 48.2 mm 2 ) was significantly wider than that of the nondominant side (25.7 mm 2 ). Conclusion Brain laterality can be explained by the side of functional (preference of the hands, eyes, ears, and feet, and survey) has a positive correlation with chewing preference side. MAI between the brain dominant and nondominant sides was not significant. This shows that mastication efficiency does not differ between dominant and nondominant sides. So, this study suggests that brain dominance is correlated with chewing preference, but it does not affect efficiency of mastication.

Objectives To compare the normal eruption pattern and angulation in impacted maxillary canines using panoramic radiographs to predict maxillary canine impaction. Materials and Methods Patients aged 6 to 15 years were classified into the normal eruption group (n = 229) and the impaction group (n = 191). At least two panoramic radiographs were taken in the normal eruption group during the eruption process of the maxillary canine. The growth pattern of the maxillary canine was analyzed using an XY coordinate system, with the tip of the maxillary lateral incisor as the origin and the tooth's long axis as the Y-axis and measurement of the relative position of the crown tip and angulation of the maxillary canine. Results The crown tips of normally erupted maxillary canines were intensively distributed along the distal surface of the maxillary lateral incisor, while those of impacted canines were widely distributed. The angulations of the normally erupted canines increased as eruption increased along the lateral incisor and then decreased at the cervical point of the lateral incisor. The angulations of the impacted canines were scattered, with no uniform pattern. Conclusions While using the normal eruption path of the maxillary canine and the pattern of change in angulation based on the distal surface of the maxillary lateral incisor, early intervention or regular follow-up is needed to prevent maxillary canine impaction.

No abstract

No abstract