BackgroundSarcopenia and post‐operative accelerated muscle loss leading to cachexia are commonly observed in patients with pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to assess the influence of body compositions and post‐operative muscle change on survival of patients with surgically treated pancreatic cancer.MethodsWe analysed data of patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2015. Skeletal muscle areas, muscle attenuation, and visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue areas were measured from two sets of computed tomography images at L3 vertebral levels. In addition, muscle change was calculated from images obtained before and after cancer resection. We set our own cut‐off values of various body compositions based on sex‐specific tertiles.ResultsA total of 180 patients were analysed. Patients with perioperative sarcopenia (n = 60) showed poorer overall survival than those without perioperative sarcopenia (P = 0.031). Fifty (28.6%) patients with accelerated muscle loss after surgery (>10%/60 days) had poorer survival compared with the others (P = 0.029). Sarcopenia (hazard ratio, 1.79: 95% confidence interval, 1.20–2.65] and post‐operative muscle change (%/60 days) (hazard ratio, 0.94: 95% confidence interval, 0.92–0.96) were identified as significant predictors of survival on multivariable analyses.ConclusionsPreoperative sarcopenia identified on CT scan was associated with poor overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer following surgery. Accelerated muscle loss after surgery also negatively impacted survival in pancreatic cancer patients.

Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces the occurrence of metachronous gastric cancer in patients who have undergone endoscopic resection.

No abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is recommended for guiding the acquisition of pancreatic tissue in patients with suspected autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Data comparing EUSguided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) sampling in the diagnosis of AIP are limited.Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid MEDLINE databases was conducted until April 2020. The pooled rates of diagnostic yield for the histologic criteria of AIP, histologic tissue procurement, and adverse events were compared between FNA and FNB. Diagnostic yields were also compared between 19 gauge (G) and 22G needles.Results: This meta-analysis included nine studies comprising 309 patients with AIP who underwent FNA and seven studies comprising 131 patients who underwent FNB. The pooled diagnostic yields for level 1 or 2 histology criteria of AIP were 55.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 37.0-73.9%, I 2 = 91.1) for FNA and 87.2% (95% CI 68.8-98.1%, I 2 = 69.4) for FNB (P = 0.030). The pooled histologic procurement rates for FNA and FNB were 91.3% (95% CI, 84.9-97.6%, I 2 = 82.9) and 87.0% (95% CI, 77.8-96.1%, I 2 = 40.0), respectively (P = 0.501). Adverse events were comparable between two groups. When analyzed by needle size, the diagnostic yield was better with a 19G needle than with a 22G needle (88.9% vs. 60.6%, P = 0.023). Conclusions:The diagnostic yield may be better with FNB needles than with FNA needles for the diagnosis of AIP, despite the similar rate of histologic tissue procurement. A quantitative definition for the histologic sample adequacy for AIP may be warranted.

Metal stents are superior to plastic stents for endoscopic transmural drainage of PFC because they have a higher clinical success rate and lower rate of adverse events.