BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is a common disease requiring surgery. Bedside ultrasound (BUS) is a core technique for emergency medicine (EM). The Alvarado score is a well-studied diagnostic tool for appendicitis. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between patients' symptoms, Alvarado score and ultrasound (US) findings, as performed by emergency physicians (EPs) and radiologists, of patients with suspected appendicitis. METHODS:Three EM specialists underwent the BUS course and core course for appendicitis assessment. Patients suspected of having appendicitis were selected and their Alvarado and modifi ed (m) Alvarado scores calculated. The specialists performed the BUS. Then, patients were given a formal US and surgery consultation if necessary. Preliminary diagnoses, admission or discharge from the emergency department (ED) and fi nal diagnosis were documented. The patients were also followed up after discharge from the hospital. RESULTS:The determined cut-off value was 2 for Alvarado and 3 for mAlvarado scores. The sensitivities of the two scores were 100%. Each score was used to rule out appendicitis. The results of EP-performed BUS were as follows: accuracy 70%, sensitivity 0.733, specifi city 0.673, + LR 2.24, and -LR 0.40 (95%CI). Radiologists were better than EPs at diagnosing appendicitis and radiologists and EPs were equally strong at ruling out appendicitis by US. When US was combined with Alvarado and mAlvarado scores, EP US+Alvarado/mAlvarado scores ≤3 and radiology US+Alvarado/ mAlvarado scores ≤4 perfectly ruled out appendicitis.CONCLUSION: BUS performed by EPs is moderately useful in detecting appendicitis. Combined with scoring systems, BUS may be a perfect tool for ruling out decisions in EDs.

Needle electromyography (EMG) is an expression of the physiological or pathophysiological state of muscles. Selection of the type of electrode used during these measurements is based upon several factors, including the location of the muscle of interest, the need for specificity, and the requirement of minimization of cross-talk between adjacent muscles. Pneumothorax is a serious complication of needle EMG. Here, we present a 19-year-old patient who suffered bilateral pneumothoraces as a complication of needle EMG. She has a history of weakness and limitation of abduction on her right shoulder for three years. EMG was ordered by orthopedic surgeon to determine whether a dorsal scapular or long thoracic nerve paralysis caused these symptoms. She was brought to our emergency department (ED) with the complaints of diaphoresis and dyspnea which began after needle EMG was performed two hours ago. A chest X-ray revealed bilateral small pneumothoraces and was confirmed by computed thoracic tomography scan. Patient was admitted to observation unit in ED. Thoracic ultrasonography was preferred to follow up the patient. After five days, pneumothoraces were dissolved on bilaterally and the patient was discharged to home. Iatrogenic pneumothorax is a complication observed at various clinical fields. Emergency physician must consider this possibility in patients admitted with dyspnea after needle EMG.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the CLUE protocol in COVID-19 triage. Materials and Methods: Patients who presented to the emergency department due to dyspnea with oxygen saturation below 95 % and were diagnosed with COVID-19 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests were included in this prospective, observational study. Patients included in the study underwent lung ultrasound (LUS) in the light of the CLUE protocol, and were accordingly given LUS scores of between 0 and 36, also within the scope of the protocol. Patients were placed under observation, and clinical outcomes of discharge from the emergency department, admission to the ward, and admission to intensive care or discharge were recorded. ROC analysis was applied in the calculation of threshold values for LUS scores predicting discharge, admission to intensive care, and mortality. Results: Forty-five patients with a mean age of 63 ± 18 years were included in the study. Fifteen patients (33 %) were treated on an outpatient basis and discharged, while 12 (27 %) were admitted to the ward and 18 (40 %) to the intensive care unit. Mortality occurred in 15 (33 %) patients. An LUS score lower than 3 was 97 % sensitive and 80 % specific for discharge, a score greater than 10 was 94 % sensitive and 78 % specific for admission to the intensive care unit, and a score higher than 11 was 93 % sensitive and 87 % specific for mortality. Based on regression analysis, an LUS score higher than 10 emerged as an independent risk factor for intensive care requirement, a score lower than 3 for discharge, and a score over 11 for mortality. Conclusion: The CLUE protocol may be a useful bedside test in COVID-19 triage, and one that does not involve radiation or require laboratory tests.

No abstract

Objectives Although inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) measurement can be useful as a noninvasive method for monitoring the volume status, the benefit of abdominal aorta diameter (AAD) measurement is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the combined use of the IVCD and AAD in blood loss monitoring. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at the blood donor center of a training and research hospital. Standard blood donation criteria were followed during volunteer enrollment. Vital signs and ultrasound IVCD and AAD measurements were obtained before and after blood donation and after fluid resuscitation with 500 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride. Measurements before and after blood donation and after fluid resuscitation were compared by the paired t and Wilcoxon matched‐pair tests. Results Thirty‐nine volunteers were included in the study. With 500 mL of blood loss, percent changes in the shock index (SI; mean ± SD, 7% ± 6%), IVCD (6% ± 2%), and caval/aorta index (IVCD/AAD; 6.1% ± 3%) were similar and were higher (P < .001 for all parameters) than the changes in the pulse rate (3% ± 4%), AAD (0.5% ± 1.5%), systolic blood pressure (3% ± 4%), and diastolic blood pressure (2% ± 7%). Although IVCD and SI values changed significantly (P < .001 for both) after 500 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride resuscitation, no significant change was observed in the IVCD/AAD (P = .059). Conclusions The IVCD/AAD, SI, and IVCD may have similar success rates in diagnosing early blood loss. Additionally, the SI and IVCD may be superior to the IVCD/AAD in bleeding patients requiring simultaneous fluid resuscitation.