Simultaneous scalp EEG complements intracranial EEG evaluation even after a detailed inpatient scalp video EEG evaluation and could be part of standard intracranial EEG studies in patients with intractable focal epilepsy.
Objectives
We aimed to explore the diagnostic value, clinical correlates and electroencephalographic features of FIRDA (Frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity).
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed reports from EEG studies done in adults at our tertiary center between January 2015 and May 2018. For cases demonstrating FIRDA, medical files were reviewed and each case was given a diagnostic category. EEG recordings were reviewed and electrophysiologic data were extracted including FIRDA characteristics (frequency, location, duration, and symmetry). Then, a statistical analysis was done to evaluate the relationship between the diagnostic categories and EEG variables.
Results
Ninety‐four cases of FIRDA were found, with a frequency of 1.6% among inpatients. EEG recordings were available for review in 84 cases. FIRDA was asymmetric in 43 of these cases (49%), usually more prominent on the left (36/43, 84%). The diagnostic category groups included epilepsy (n = 39, 41%), other central nervous system (CNS) disease (n = 33, 35%), and systemic illness (n = 22, 23%). A significant difference in FIRDA location was found, as patients with epilepsy or other CNS disease, had a significantly higher probability for the delta activity to involve the temporal areas (frontotemporal location in 27/64 in these groups compared with 3/20 in the systemic illness group, P‐value = .033).
Conclusions
This study provides insights to the diagnosis underlying FIRDA, especially the high rate of epilepsy patients, and calls for further neurologic investigation of cases in which FIRDA involves the temporal areas since most of these cases were due to epilepsy or other CNS disease and not a systemic illness.
A B S T R A C TPurpose: To determine if simultaneous bilateral scalp EEG (scEEG) can accurately detect a contralateral seizure onset in patients with unilateral intracranial EEG (IEEG) implantation. Methods: We evaluated 39 seizures from 9 patients with bitemporal epilepsy who underwent simultaneous scEEG and IEEG (SSIEEG). To simulate conditions of unilateral IEEG implantation with a missed contralateral seizure onset, we analyzed the IEEG recording contralateral to the seizure onset (CL-IEEG), in conjunction with simultaneous scEEG. The following criteria were evaluated between scEEG and CL-IEEG (1) latency: the time to onset of EEG seizure (2) location: concordance of ictal onset zones and (3) pattern: congruence of EEG morphology and frequency. Results: SSIEEG correctly lateralized 36/39 (92.3%) seizures compared to 13/39 (33.3%) seizures using CL-IEEG alone (OR = 24.0, p < 0.01), 33 (84.6%) seizures using scEEG alone (OR = 2.2, p = 0.29) and 26 (66.9%) seizures using time of clinical onset alone (OR = 6.0, p = 0.01). For the three criteria evaluated, (1) 22/39 (56.4%) seizures had an earlier onset on the scEEG, compared to CL-IEEG; (2) lack of congruence of location of seizure onset was noted in 33/39 (84.6%) of the seizures; and (3) 22/39 (56.4%) seizures did not have a congruent ictal pattern. Conclusions: The chronological, topographic and morphologic features of SSIEEG can accurately detect the hemisphere of seizure onset in most cases with unilateral IEEG implantation. SSIEEG is significantly better than, IEEG, scEEG or clinical onset alone in this scenario. We propose that SSIEEG should be considered in all cases of intractable focal epilepsy undergoing unilateral IEEG evaluation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.