Malnutrition, intended as both overnutrition and undernutrition, is a common problem in children with cancer, impacting quality of life as well as survival. In addition, nutritional imbalances during childhood can significantly affect proper growth. Nevertheless, there is currently a lack of a systematic approach to this issue in the pediatric oncology population. To fill this gap, we aimed to provide practice recommendations for the uniform management of nutritional needs in children with cancer. Twenty-one clinical questions addressing evaluation and treatment of nutritional problems in children with cancer were formulated by selected members from four Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP) centers and from the Survivorship Care and Nutritional Support Working Group of Alliance Against Cancer. A literature search in PubMed was performed; during two consensus meetings, all recommendations were discussed and finalized using the nominal group technique. Members representing every institution voted on each recommendation. Finally, recommendations were approved by all authors.
In recent years, the influence of nutrition on the health and growth of children has become increasingly important. The relevance of nutrition is even greater for children who are facing cancer. Malnutrition, within the context of undernutrition and overnutrition, may impact not only the effectiveness of treatments and outcomes, but also the quality of life for patients and their families. In this article, we review nutritional assessment methods for children with cancer, focusing on the specific characteristics of this population and analyze the efficacy of nutritional interventions, which include enteral, parenteral, and nutritional education. From our analysis, two important conclusions emerged: i) there is a need to focus our attention on the nutritional status and the body composition of oncologic children, since these factors have a relevant impact on clinical outcomes during treatment as well as after their conclusion; ii) the support of skilled clinical nutrition personnel would be extremely helpful for the global management of these patients.
Herein we describe a 8-years-old boy with chronic non-malignant non-infectious lymphadenopathy, failure to thrive, weakness, arthralgia, relapsing oral aftosis, and multiple non-invasive infections of the skin.Immunological and genetic studies revealed the expansion of TCRαβ + CD4 -/CD8 -T cells and a previously described heterozygous CASP10 mutation. This observation suggests that CASP10 mutations can lead to clinical manifestations that are not typical of Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome.
On March 12th 2021 the Italian Government decided to implement a national lockdown in almost all the regions of the country. It was the second most severe measure taken after the March 2020 national lockdown, due to the rising of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and the overcrowding of the hospitals. Italy was the first European country hit by the COVID-19 pandemic in February 2020. The first 'red' zones under severe lockdown in the Regions of Northern Italy were established on February 26th 2020, when all the schools were closed. Phase I of a nationwide lockdown began on March 8th and lasted until April 30th 2020. The Regions of Northern Italy were the most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in the first months of 2020, with the highest incidence of COVID-19 cases, leading to a dramatic surge in the need for emergency rooms (ERs) and wards, and a high mortality rate. 1 The first peak of 29 000 hospitalised individuals, including children, except those in intensive care units (ICUs) was recorded in April 2020. Most hospitals had to rapidly implement strategies to ensure care for non-COVID-19 patients. 2 The majority of children with sickle cell disease (SCD) live in the Northern regions of Italy. 3 Therefore, the dramatic scenario represented an opportunity to explore the challenges presented for children with SCD who lived in Italy during the first outbreak, so that the lessons learned could be used to guide clinical management in the upcoming months.SCD is characterised by the presence of unpredictable and frequent acute events such as painful vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), acute chest syndrome (ACS) and febrile episodes with risk of severe infections. 4 VOCs, ACS and fever are the most frequent reasons for access to the ER and for hospitalisation. In previous years, data from the Network of Centres belonging to the Italian Association of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology [Associazione Italiana di Ematologia e Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP)] showed a high frequency of access to the ER and admission to hospital for VOCs, ACS and fever for children with SCD living in Italy during the coldest months, due to the trigger of seasonal infections (January-March). 3,5,6 The viral pandemic and the presence of febrile respiratory tract symptoms characteristic of the COVID-19 infection suggested a greater risk of acute events in children with SCD. Several reports have focussed on service provision to children with SCD 7 or the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 infection in children with SCD, 8,9 but to date, less information is
Background: Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) is the second cause of hospitalization in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), burdened by significant morbidity and mortality. The guidelines regarding management of ACS are sometimes difficult to follow in the real world and the prevention and treatment strategies of ACS are often applied in an uneven manner in the various settings (community care, regional hospitals, reference university centers). Moreover, epidemiology, clinical phenotype and outcomes as well as risk factors could vary in different populations according to ethnicity, genotype or health care system organization. Aims and Methods: A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted to investigate the epidemiology of ACS and to the evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of ACS in children with SCD (age 0-18 years) in the 2013-2018 period, after the publication of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology Oncology (AIEOP) Guidelines for the Management of SCD in Childhood in Italy in 2012. Results: 126 children were recruited and 122 included in the analysis, with 208 evaluable episodes of ACS (range: 1-6 episodes /patient) from 11 AIEOP Centers. 73 M, 49 F. Mean age was 10.9 years. 85% patients were of African origin, 92% were HbSS/SB°; mean age at diagnosis of SCD of the entire cohort was 25,3 months (range 0-16,8). 44.2% of patients had more than one episode of ACS during the study period; 37% had had a previous episode before 2013. 58% had comorbidities, mostly respiratory (asthma or allergy). 75% of the patients underwent disease modifying treatment during study period (73% hydroxyurea, 2% chronic transfusion). The seasonality of ACS episodes was important in our country: 75% of episodes occured between October and March. 95% of ACS episodes were secondary to a Vaso-Occlusive Crisis. 76% of the admissions occurred in SCD reference centers, 24% in regional hospitals, but 30% later required transfer to reference centers for worsening of clinical conditions or need of exchange transfusion. The mean length of hospitalization was 9.6 days (range 1-46); one patient died of pneumococcal sepsis; 6 episodes required transfer to the Intensive Care Unit, mechanical ventilation was required in one episode. A good adherence to the AIEOP Guidelines was documented for some aspects: 99% of the patients were hospitalized, 98% performed chest X-ray for the diagnosis of ACS and in 99% antibiotic therapy was started. Others aspects were less satisfactory and in need of improvement: incentive spirometry was only performed in 19% of admissions; oxygen therapy was performed only in 75% of patients even if SatO2 was<95%; transfer to reference centers was not always timely. During 75% of ACS episodes a simple red cell transfusion was required for Hb>8g/dl, while in 16% an exchange transfusion was performed for severe respiratory distress (of these 71% were performed in patients transfered from regional hospitals); 38% required inhaled bronchodilators, 6% steroids. A preliminay evaluation of risk factors for recurrent ACS showed that in our cohort allergy to inhaled allergens (p 0.02) and enuresis (p 0.01) were associated with increased prevalence of recurrent ACS; patients with asthma/wheezing also presented more recurrent ACS compared to patients wihout them (23% vs 13%) but this data did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: This study represents the first analysis in Italy of ACS, which is confirmed as a frequent event in our cohort, with a significant proportion of patients who experience recurrent ACS. Steps need to be undertaken to improve management of ACS and adherence to the AIEOP guidelines at a national level: stimulate the application of early preventive measures that are still under-utilized, increase the appropriateness of multidisciplinary specialist approach (transfusion specialist, acute care physicians, pneumologists, hematologists) strengthen the dissemination of information through training events for all the Hospitals of the network. Disclosures Colombatti: AddMedica: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.
We describe a previously healthy 14-year-old girl with acute onset autoimmune hemolytic anemia, associated with severe but transient lymphopenia during corticosteroid therapy, without infectious episodes during follow-up. After detailed investigations to rule out an underlying immunodeficiency, we detected a heterozygous ADA gene mutation. This was associated with slightly increased blood levels of adenosine and deoxyadenosine nucleotides and with reduced ADA activity in red blood cells, but within the normal range. This observation suggests that heterozygous ADA mutation might be a predisposing factor for lymphopenia in patients receiving corticosteroid therapy.
Introduction Asplenic patients are at high risk of potentially fatal invasive infections, such as sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia. It has been shown that infection from influenza viruses can precede or increase the risk of bacterial infection and of serious complications of the underlying disease. International and national guidelines recommend annual influenza vaccination in asplenic subjects. Following the Covid-19 pandemic, the major government and medical-scientific institutions in the US and in Europe have been planning how to contain infection during the 2020-2021 influenza season. Extending influenza vaccination is the safest and most effective way to reduce the circulation of influenza virus and to promote the correct diagnosis and management of suspected cases of SARS-CoV-2. Influenza vaccination also reduces complications associated with the underlying disease and visits to Emergency Units. Our study aims to evaluate influenza vaccination in a large population of asplenic patients and explore the main causes for non-vaccination to identify critical areas for improvement in the vaccination programme in these at-risk patients for the 2020-2021 influenza season. Methods The Italian Network of Asplenia (INA) is made up of 88 doctors working in 50 clinical centers in 27 cities and 16 of the 20 regions of Italy. It aims to build a large, prospective cohort of asplenic patients throughout Italy through which to study the interaction between asplenia and its associated underlying conditions, collecting precise, accurate data also in cases of rarer diseases. The study also aims to improve the quality of healthcare for this at-risk population. The number of patients enrolled in the Network who had had at least one dose of influenza vaccine at the time of diagnosis of asplenia was retrieved from the INA database. All participating centers were asked to answer a questionnaire to report the main obstacles for influenza vaccination. Results At 1st August 2020, 1,670 patients had been enrolled in the INA (783 females; 887 males). All underlying causes of asplenia are shown in Table 1. Only 466 (28%) patients had had at least one influenza vaccination, while 1,204 (72%) had never been vaccinated since diagnosis of asplenia. Thirty-five (70%) of the 50 centers answered the questionnaire. Main causes of non-vaccination were physicians' ambivalence concerning vaccination and patients' inadequate awareness or logistical problems. Conclusions These data show very low seasonal influenza vaccination cover even though asplenic patients are considered at-risk of complications associated with infection from influenza viruses. Since the 2020-2021 influenza season could see influenza viruses in circulation with SARS-CoV-2, influenza vaccination must be expanded as widely as possible, in particular to subjects of all ages at high risk. These results reveal important areas of concern in the management of asplenic patients and the need to improve the quality of information to physicians and patients alike. The INA co-ordinating center will launch a campaign to provide information and organize ad hoc meetings to widen influenza vaccination coverage in asplenic patients and reduce the pressure on the national health service during the next influenza season. Disclosures Forni: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Colombatti:Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giona:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding. Ferrero:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau. Perrotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Casale:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.