The chromodomain of the HP1 family of proteins recognizes histone tails with specifically methylated lysines. Here, we present structural, energetic, and mutational analyses of the complex between the Drosophila HP1 chromodomain and the histone H3 tail with a methyllysine at residue 9, a modification associated with epigenetic silencing. The histone tail inserts as a beta strand, completing the beta-sandwich architecture of the chromodomain. The methylammonium group is caged by three aromatic side chains, whereas adjacent residues form discerning contacts with one face of the chromodomain. Comparison of dimethyl- and trimethyllysine-containing complexes suggests a role for cation-pi and van der Waals interactions, with trimethylation slightly improving the binding affinity.

On the histone H3 tail, Lys 9 and Lys 27 are both methylation sites associated with epigenetic repression, and reside within a highly related sequence motif ARKS. Here we show that the chromodomain proteins Polycomb (Pc) and HP1 (heterochromatin protein 1) are highly discriminatory for binding to these sites in vivo and in vitro. In Drosophila S2 cells, and on polytene chromosomes, methyl-Lys 27 and Pc are both excluded from areas that are enriched in methyl-Lys 9 and HP1. Swapping of the chromodomain regions of Pc and HP1 is sufficient for switching the nuclear localization patterns of these factors, indicating a role for their chromodomains in both target site binding and discrimination. To better understand the molecular basis for the selection of methyl-lysine binding sites, we solved the 1.8 Å structure of the Pc chromodomain in complex with a H3 peptide bearing trimethyl-Lys 27, and compared it with our previously determined structure of the HP1 chromodomain in complex with a H3 peptide bearing trimethyl-Lys 9. The Pc chromodomain distinguishes its methylation target on the H3 tail via an extended recognition groove that binds five additional residues preceding the ARKS motif. Chromatin structure contains the molecular imprint underlying cell memory and epigenetic inheritance, and emerging evidence suggests that covalent modifications of histones play a major role as carriers of epigenetic information (Felsenfeld and Groudine 2003). Histone modifications can be highly reversible, such as histone acetylation, or more stable, such as histone (lysine) methylation (Zhang and Reinberg 2001;Lachner and Jenuwein 2002). Thus, a wide range of chromatin-based regulatory options is available. These include dynamic marks permitting rapid changes in gene expression in response to physiological and environmental stimuli as well as more permanent indexing systems required for the passage of heritable patterns of epigenetic information from one cell generation to the next (Fischle et al. 2003). The identification of enzyme systems responsible for the steady-state balance of posttranslational histone modifications, together with the discovery of binding modules that "read" covalent marks on histones, have been key for our present understanding of gene regulation in the context of the chromatin polymer.Bromodomains have been the first modules implicated in the read-out of histone marks. They show affinity for acetylated lysines in histone and nonhistone proteins (for review, see Zeng and Zhou 2002), and local recruitment of bromodomain factors to certain regions of chromatin might function in mediating acetyl-histone-encoded antisilencing (Ladurner et al. 2003). In contrast, a second conserved module found in a variety of chromosomal proteins, the chromodomain, has been implicated in binding to methylated lysines on the histone tails (Bannister et al. 2001;Jacobs et al. 2001;Lachner et al. 2001). Indeed, recently a biochemical pathway of gene repression by heterochromatin assembly, involving methylation of Lys 9 of H3 by SE...

The nuclear receptors REV-ERBα (encoded by NR1D1) and REV-ERBβ (NR1D2) have remained orphans owing to the lack of identified physiological ligands. Here we show that heme is a physiological ligand of both receptors. Heme associates with the ligand-binding domains of the REV-ERB receptors with a 1:1 stoichiometry and enhances the thermal stability of the proteins. Results from experiments of heme depletion in mammalian cells indicate that heme binding to REV-ERB causes the recruitment of the co-repressor NCoR, leading to repression of target genes including BMAL1 (official symbol ARNTL), an essential component of the circadian oscillator. Heme extends the known types of ligands used by the human nuclear receptor family beyond the endocrine hormones and dietary lipids described so far. Our results further indicate that heme regulation of REV-ERBs may link the control of metabolism and the mammalian clock.REV-ERBα was originally identified as an orphan member of the nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) family on the basis of its canonical domain structure and sequence conservation 1,2 . REV-ERBβ was subsequently identified by its homology to other NHRs and its pattern of expression, which overlaps greatly with that of REV-ERBα. Both receptors have particularly high expression in the liver, adipose tissue, skeletal muscle and brain 3-8 , where they are transcribed in a circadian manner 9-11 . The REV-ERBs are unique in the NHR superfamily in that they lack the carboxy-terminal tail (helix 12) of the ligand-binding domain (LBD), which is required for coactivator recognition 12

Chromodomains are modules implicated in the recognition of lysine-methylated histone tails and nucleic acids. CHD (for chromo-ATPase/helicase-DNA-binding) proteins regulate ATP-dependent nucleosome assembly and mobilization through their conserved double chromodomains and SWI2/SNF2 helicase/ATPase domain. The Drosophila CHD1 localizes to the interbands and puffs of the polytene chromosomes, which are classic sites of transcriptional activity. Other CHD isoforms (CHD3/4 or Mi-2) are important for nucleosome remodelling in histone deacetylase complexes. Deletion of chromodomains impairs nucleosome binding and remodelling by CHD proteins. Here we describe the structure of the tandem arrangement of the human CHD1 chromodomains, and its interactions with histone tails. Unlike HP1 and Polycomb proteins that use single chromodomains to bind to their respective methylated histone H3 tails, the two chromodomains of CHD1 cooperate to interact with one methylated H3 tail. We show that the human CHD1 double chromodomains target the lysine 4-methylated histone H3 tail (H3K4me), a hallmark of active chromatin. Methylammonium recognition involves two aromatic residues, not the three-residue aromatic cage used by chromodomains of HP1 and Polycomb proteins. Furthermore, unique inserts within chromodomain 1 of CHD1 block the expected site of H3 tail binding seen in HP1 and Polycomb, instead directing H3 binding to a groove at the inter-chromodomain junction.

To elucidate the kinetic importance of structural intermediates in single-domain proteins, we measured the effect of solution conditions and amino-acid changes at a central core residue of ubiquitin (Val 26) on the kinetics of folding and unfolding. Kinetic analysis in terms of a sequential three-state mechanism provides insight into the contribution of specific interactions within the ubiquitin core to the structural stability of the native and intermediate states. The observations that disruptive mutations and/or addition of denaturants result in an apparent two-state folding process with slower rates is explained by the destabilization of a partially folded intermediate, which is in rapid equilibrium with unfolded states. The model predicts that under sufficiently stabilizing conditions kinetic intermediates may become populated even for proteins showing apparent two-state kinetics.