Background and ObjectivesZZThis study is aimed to investigate the efficacy of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone when used for Intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI) concurrent with systemic steroid as primary therapy. Subjects and MethodZZWe undertook a retrospective study of 106 patients diagnosed with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss at our institution. These patients were divided into the following groups based on their intratympanic steroid medications: Group 1 (which received dexamethasone for ITSI) and Group 2 (which received methylprednisolone for ITSI). The severity of pain after ITSI was also compared using Visual Analogue Scale. ResultsZZThe therapeutic results of both groups showed no significant difference. The improvement of pure tone audiometry average threshold were 18.3±19.5 dB for Group 1 and 22.4±25.8 dB for Group 2, with no significant differences (p=0.402). The recovery rate according to Siegel's criteria were 34/70 (48.6%) and 18/36 (50.0%) respectively, with no significant differences (p=0.889). The degree of pain after ITSI were 1.51±1.06 and 3.92±1.63 for Group 1 and 2, respectively, showing significant differences (p＜0.001). Again, there were no significant differences even when accompanying symptoms or severity of initial hearing loss were considered. ConclusionZZThere was no significant difference between efficacy of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone when used as primary therapy. Methylprednisolne caused more severe pain after ITSI, suggesting the choice of dexamethasone. Further studies are needed about the concentration of injected steroid.

Breast cancer is the second most common malignancy in Korean women, and its incidence has increased rapidly. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients with breast cancer treated at a low volume center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 401 patients with stage I-III breast cancer at Chosun University Hospital from January 1998 to December 2013. We reviewed medical records including clinical information and pathologic reports. Results: We found 401 cases of newly diagnosed breast cancer, including 5 (1.2%) male breast cancer patients. According to histological features, there were 43 cases (ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): 35 cases [8.7%], lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS): 8 cases [2.0%]) of non-invasive carcinoma, 350 cases (87.3%) of invasive carcinoma, 2 cases (0.5%) of Paget's disease, 1 case (0.2%) of malignant phyllodes tumor, 3 cases (0.7%) of sarcoma, and 2 cases (0.5%) of other types. With respect to disease stage, 117 (29.2%) patients were in stage I, 176 (43.9%) in stage II, and 78 (19.4%) in stage III. The type of surgical approaches were breast-conserving surgery (153, 38.2%), modified radical mastectomy (243, 60.6%), wide excision (4, 1.0%), and others (1, 0.2%). Five-year disease-free survival rates were 100% (stage 0), 95.4% (stage I), 91.4% (stage IIa), 75% (stage IIb), 78% (stage IIIa), 50% (stage IIIb), and 59.2% (stage IIIc). Overall survival rates were 100% (stage 0), 96.2% (stage I), 94.3% (stage IIa), 85.4% (stage IIb), 84.8% (stage IIIa), 50% (stage IIIb), and 55.5% (stage IIIc). Conclusion: Although the patients were treated at a low-volume center, their favorable survival outcomes are notable. Further multicenter (low-volume centers) research is warranted.