Objective
To evaluate predictors of more aggressive disease and the role of multiparametric 3.0‐T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selecting patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance (AS).
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively assessed 298 patients with prostate cancer who met the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) criteria, defined as T1c/T2, PSA level of ≤10 ng/mL, PSA density (PSAD) of <0.2 ng/mL2, Gleason score <7, and one or two positive biopsy cores.
All patients underwent preoperative MRI, including T2‐weighted, diffusion‐weighted, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging, as well as radical prostatectomy (RP) between June 2005 and December 2011.
Imaging results were correlated with pathological findings to evaluate the ability of MRI to select patients for AS.
Results
In 35 (11.7%) patients, no discrete cancer was visible on MRI, while in the remaining 263 (88.3%) patients, a discrete cancer was visible. Pathological examination of RP specimens resulted in upstaging (>T2) in 21 (7%) patients, upgrading (Gleason score >6) in 136 (45.6%), and a diagnosis of unfavourable disease in 142 (47.7%) patients.
The 263 patients (88.3%) with visible cancer on imaging were more likely to have their cancer status upgraded (49.8% vs 14.3%) and be diagnosed with unfavourable disease (52.1% vs 14.3%) than the 35 patients (11.7%) with no cancer visible upon imaging, and these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001 for all).
A visible cancer lesion on MRI, PSAD, and patient age were found to be predictors of unfavourable disease in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
MRI can predict adverse pathological features and be used to assess the eligibility of patients with prostate cancer for AS.
Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy showed shorter operation time and generally equivalent perioperative results to TP RPN. RP RPN is a viable treatment option for treating posterior or lateral renal masses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.