No abstract

Inhibition of cyclooxygenase (Cox) enzymatic activity by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) provides the molecular basis of analgesia following wounding or surgery. This study investigated the role of Cox activity in the regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in keratinocytes and the formation of new blood vessels in acute wounds in mice. To this end, human HaCaT keratinocytes were stimulated with epidermal growth factor (EGF). EGF increased Cox-1 mRNA in the presence of the constitutively expressed Cox-1 protein in keratinocytes. EGF coinduced Cox-2 and VEGF mRNA and protein expression and an accumulation of prostaglandin E (PGE ) in cell culture supernatants. Inhibition of Cox isozyme activity by Cox-1 and -2 siRNA or ibuprofen reduced PGE and VEGF release from keratinocytes. In a mouse model of excisional wound healing, Cox-2 and VEGF expression were colocalized in the granulation tissue of acute wounds. Oral treatment of mice with the Cox-1 and -2 inhibitor diclofenac was associated with reduced levels of VEGF protein and an impaired blood vessel formation in acute wound tissue. In summary, our data suggest that a reduction of PGE -triggered VEGF protein expression in wound keratinocytes is likely to contribute to the observed impairment of wound neovascularisation upon Cox inhibition.

No abstract

Background Healthy volunteer registry donors have become the backbone of stem cell transplantation programs. While most registrants will never become actual donors, a small minority are called upon twice, most commonly for the same patient because of poor graft function. Anecdotal evidence provides no hard reasons to disallow second-time mobilized apheresis, but few centers have treated enough two-time donors for definitive conclusions. Moreover, for reasons unknown, the efficiency of G-CSF varies greatly between donations. Methods Comparison of outcomes of first vs. second donations can formally confirm G-CSF responsiveness as intrinsically, likely genetically, determined. In our database, we identified 60 donors (1.3%) who received two cycles of G-CSF 24 days to 4 years apart and systematically compared mobilization outcomes. Results First and second mobilization and collection proceeded without severe or unusual adverse effects. First-time mobilization efficiency was highly predictive of second-time mobilization. Neither mobilization efficiency nor time lag between donations affected the similarity of first- and second-time mobilization outcomes. Conclusions With the caveat that only donors with an unremarkable first donation were cleared for a second, our data indicate that a second donation is feasible, equally tolerable as a first donation, and efficient. Moreover, the data strongly support the notion of donor-intrinsic variables dictating mobilization response and argue against relevant damage to the stem cell compartment during mobilization with rhG-CSF.