Background Pancreatic cancer is associated with a high thromboembolism risk. We investigated the significance of early venous thromboembolism (VTE) detection in patients with unresectable metastatic pancreatic cancer (UR-MPC) who received first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP). Methods This single-center retrospective study enrolled 174 patients with UR-MPC who underwent GnP as a first-line chemotherapy from April 2017 to March 2020. The early detection of VTE (deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism) was defined as diagnosis by the first follow-up CT scan after the initiation of chemotherapy. We compared the patients with early detection of VTE (VTE (+) group) with the others (VTE (-) group). We examined overall survival (OS), progress free survival (PFS), severe adverse events, and predictors associated with OS using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results Early detection of VTE was observed in 17 patients (9.8%). Thirteen patients were diagnosed with VTE at treatment initiation, and four patients were diagnosed after treatment initiation. The median time to diagnosis after treatment initiation was 55 days (range: 31–71 days). Only 3 patients were symptomatic. The VTE (+) group exhibited worse OS and PFS than the VTE (-) group (OS: 259 days vs. 400 days, P < 0.001; PFS: 120 days vs. 162 days, P = 0.008). The frequency of grade 3–4 adverse events was not significantly different. Although the performance status was poorer in the VTE (+) group, VTE was identified as a statistically significant independent predictor for OS in multivariate analyses (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.02–3.44; P = 0.041). Conclusions Early VTE detection is a predictor of a poor prognosis in UR-MPC patients who receive GnP as first-line chemotherapy, suggesting that screening VTE for patients with UR-MPC is crucial, even if patients are asymptomatic.

Salvage chemotherapy for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (UR-PC) who have been treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/l-leucovorin (LV) plus nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), has not been fully established. We retrospectively reviewed data from 17 patients with UR-PC who initiated 5-FU/l-LV plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as salvage chemotherapy at our hospital between June 2020 and August 2021, after treatment with GnP and 5-FU/LV plus nal-IRI. The primary endpoint was tumor response. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). The response and disease control rates were 5.9% (1/17) and 17.6% (3/17), respectively. The median PFS was 1.8 months (range: 0.4–5.2 months). Eight patients (47.1%) experienced grade 3 nonhematologic AEs, while none experienced grade 3 hematologic AEs. Two patients with controlled disease had homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-associated gene mutations in cancer panel testing. The FOLFOX regimen benefit for UR-PC patients treated with GnP and 5-FU/LV plus nal-IRI may be limited to patients with HRD-associated gene mutations.

Background and Aim Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune‐related adverse events in the liver. The risk of exacerbating liver injury is of concern in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), as immunotherapy can damage liver function because of the immune response against viral antigens. We assessed the feasibility of immunotherapy in HBV‐ or HCV‐infected patients. Methods This retrospective study included 266 patients with persistent or past HBV infection, 26 patients seropositive for anti‐HCV, and 820 patients with negative viral markers for HBV and HCV, who were treated with ICIs. ICI‐induced liver injury and changes in virological markers were analyzed. Results The occurrence rates of ICI‐induced liver injury in the HBsAg‐positive, anti‐HBc‐positive/anti‐HBs‐positive, and anti‐HBc‐positive/anti‐HBs‐negative groups were 12.5, 21.6, and 19.1%, respectively, which were comparable with those of the negative for HBV‐ and HCV‐related markers group (20.9%). The frequency of any grade ICI‐induced liver injury was different among the HCV RNA‐positive (3/5; 60.0%), anti‐HCV‐positive/HCV RNA‐negative (2/21; 9.5%), and negative for HBV‐ and HCV‐related markers (171/820; 20.9%) groups (P = 0.045), with no significant difference in grade ≥2 ICI‐induced liver injury. In patients with persistent infection, neither serum HBV DNA, HBsAg, nor HCV RNA level changed significantly during ICI treatment. One of five treatment‐naïve HCV‐infected patients required interruption of ICI treatment due to virus‐related liver injury. Conclusion Immunotherapy is feasible for most cancer patients with chronic HBV or HCV infection; however, liver function and virological markers should be carefully monitored in treatment‐naïve patients, especially those with HCV infection, during ICI treatment.

Progress in next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled comprehensive analysis of tumor genomic alterations. 1,2 Anti-cancer drugs targeting specific genomic alterations, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), 3 human epidermal growth factor receptor-related 2 (HER2), 4 and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), 5 have improved survival and disease response in patients with various malignancies. Thus, cancer genomic profiling (CGP) tests using NGS are widely used, and the identification of actionable genomic alterations for molecular targeted therapies has contributed to the improvement of prognoses. 6,7 Biopsy specimens from liver tumors, as well as surgical resections, are used for CGP test. Tumor fraction of the specimen must be over

No abstract