Costly and time consuming testing techniques and the difficulties in providing undisturbed samples for these tests have led researchers to estimate strength parameters of soils with simple index tests. However, the paper focuses on estimation of strength parameters of soils as a function of the index properties. Analytical hierarchy process and multiple regression analysis based methodology were performed on datasets obtained from soil tests on 41 samples in Tertiary volcanic regolith. While the hierarchy model focused on determining the most important index properties affecting on strength parameters, regression analysis established meaningful relationships between strength parameters and index properties. The negative polynomial correlations between the friction angle and plasticity properties, and the positive exponential relations between the cohesion and plasticity properties were determined. These relations are characterized by a regression coefficient of 0.80. However, Terzaghi bearing capacity formulas were used to test the model. It is important to see whether there is any statistically significant relation between the calculated and the observed bearing capacity values for model testing. Based on the model, the positive linear correlation characterized by the regression coefficient of 0.86 were determined between bearing capacity values obtained by direct and indirect methods. the shearing strength is affected by the consistency of the materials, mineralogy, grain size distribution, shape of the particles, initial void ratio and features such as layers, joints, fissures and cementation (Poulos 1989). However, the consistency of soils is dependent on the weight of the water per unit weight of solid material. Because it is often highly dependent on the amount of soil water, consistency is an important property and is a useful measure for

Abstract. The phase after the determination of the landslide area in landslide susceptibility studies is the selection of methods and parameters to be used. Approximately 1500 randomly selected publications show that it is necessary to select a parameter based on the area. Research has shown that the parameter of slope is greatly preferred. There is nearly consensus of opinion among researchers regarding the use of the parameter. The research included the definition of slope made by different researchers, the advantages and disadvantages of the use of the parameter, different classifications that are used, the formation intervals of landslides, their use together with other parameters, and its effect on the formation of landslides. Classifications were studied based on the slope values at which landslides. Generally, automatic slope classifications are used in the preparation of landslide maps. There isn’t standard in parameter maps. Therefore, there isn’t class range that is referenced when preparing slope maps. In this study, preferred class ranges and slope values where landslides occur were determined in the literature. 40 landslides area has been selected in Turkey. These were evaluated in the slope classes determined according to the literature. The results compared with the literature were found to be compatible.

Aspect is one of the parameters used in the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. The procedure of this easily accessible and conclusive parameter is still a matter of debate in the literature. Each landslide area has its own morphological structure, so it is not possible to make a generalization for the aspect. In other words, there is no aspect in which landslides develop in particular. Generally, landslides occur in areas facing more than one direction. The biggest reason for this is that those areas are under the influence of other parameters. Therefore, it is wrong to evaluate the aspect, alone. Since it is a part of the system, it should be evaluated together with other conditioning factors. In this research, many landslides susceptibility studies have been investigated. The directions and causes of landslides have been determined from the studies. In addition, the criteria of the used aspect classes have been investigated. In the literature, the number of class intervals chosen, and their reasons were investigated, and the effects of this parameter were tried to be revealed in new sensitivity studies.

The preparation of landslide susceptibility maps is a complex process with regards to the selection of the study field, parameters, and methods. The phase after the determination of the landslide distribution in landslide susceptibility studies is the selection of the methods and parameters to be used. However, first, as in this study, a comprehensive literature search is required. A review of approximately 1500 randomly selected publications revealed that it was necessary to select a parameter based on the area, and the research showed that, in each study, the most preferred parameter was the slope angle. Moreover, there is nearly a consensus of opinion among researchers regarding the use of the slope angle. The current research included the definitions of the slope angle put forth by different researchers, the advantages and disadvantages of its use, the different classifications that have been used, the intervals of the landslides, its use together with other parameters, and its effect on landslides. Generally, it was observed that automatic slope angle classifications have been used in the preparation of landslide maps in the literature. Therefore, there is no standard in slope angle maps nor in the class range that is referenced when preparing them. In this study, the class ranges and slope angle values of areas where landslides have occurred were determined from the literature, and of these, 40 landslides areas were selected in Turkey and their slope angle maps were created. These were evaluated according to the slope angle classes determined in the literature. The effects of the slope angle on the landslide were determined, and an understanding was gained of how important it was to be careful when determining the classification of the slope angle. When smaller class ranges were selected, different results were obtained. This showed that following parameter selection, the selection of the range of classes was vital in the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps.

The history of landslide susceptibility maps goes back about 50 years. Danger and risk maps later followed these maps. Inventory maps provide the source of all these. There are different parameters selected specially for each field in the literature as well as parameters selected because they are easy to produce and obtain data. One of the parameters that are easy to access and prepare and are acquired from the secondary derivatives of topographical data is the parameter of elevation.This study tried to research the effect of elevation on landslides by reviewing the literature in detail. The used class ranges and elevation values were reviewed and applied to the map sections selected from Turkey. By analyzing the results, the goal was to determine at which elevation ranges landslides occurred.The study tried to investigate the effect of the parameter of elevation using data from the literature. It works to compare the elevation values for map sections selected to compare with the literature. The study comprises two stages. The first step tried to acquire statistical data by researching the data from the literature. The data were investigated in the second stage. For this purpose, close to 1,500 studies prepared between 1967 and 2019 were reviewed. According to the literature, the parameter of was used in analyses because it is easy to produce and is morphologically effective.

Bilgisayar destekli haritalama teknolojileri ve bunların geliştirilmesinde kullanılan yöntemlerde meydana gelen gelişmeler, daha yüksek performansa sahip heyelan duyarlılık haritalarının üretilmesini sağlamıştır. Bu çalışmada, bu yöntemlerden biri olan AHP'nin (Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci) heyelan duyarlılık haritalarının üretilmesinde kullanımına ilişkin ayrıntılı bir literatür derlemesi yapılmış, ayrıca AHP ile Sinop ve çevresinin heyelan duyarlılık değerlendirilmesi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Heyelan duyarlılığının değerlendirilmesinde bakı, litoloji, arazi kullanım sınıfı, yamaç eğriselliği, eğim, yükseklik, anayola, akarsuya ve yapısal unsurlara yakınlık, çalışma sahasında heyelanları kontrol eden faktörler olarak dikkate alınmıştır. Kullanılan faktörler ağırlık değerlerine göre grid haritalarına dönüştürülmüş ve karşılaştırma matrisindeki değerlerin değişik şekillerde ele alınması ile çeşitli heyelan duyarlılık haritaları üretilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, heyelanları temelde kontrol eden faktörlerin anayola uzaklık, bakı ve litoloji olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak, heyelan duyarlılığı açısından Sinop ve yakın çevresindeki çalışma sahasının, % 10.77'sinin çok düşük derecede heyelana duyarlı, % 10.59'unun düşük derecede heyelana duyarlı, % 52.64'ünün orta derecede heyelana duyarlı, %25.66'sının yüksek derecede, % 0.34'ünün çok yüksek derecede heyelana duyarlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma sonucunda, özellikle son yıllarda artan biçimde kullanılan AHP'nin çalışma alanı için yüksek performans sağladığı saptanmıştır.

No abstract

No abstract