This prospective, single-center series with WEB devices used in 39 patients during 3.5 years confirms data from previous multicenter studies. Treatment can be accomplished with good safety and efficacy, with a high rate of adequate occlusion. Anatomic results were not worse in case of WEB shape modification.

Background and purpose: Whether to withhold mechanical thrombectomy when the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion exceeds a given volume is undetermined. Our aim was to identify markers that will help to select patients with large DWI lesions [DWIÀAlberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (DWI-ASPECTS) ≤ 5] that may benefit from thrombectomy. Methods: From May 2010 to November 2016, 82 acute ischaemic stroke patients with DWI-ASPECTS ≤5 (43 men, 64.6 AE 14.4 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 18.4 AE 5.4) treated with state-of-the-art mechanical thrombectomy were studied. Thrombectomy alone was performed in 28 (34%) and bridging therapy in 54 (66%) patients. Recanalization was defined as a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2B-3 and significant hemorrhagic transformation as parenchymal haematoma type 2 (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study 3 classification). Pretreatment variables were compared between patients with a good (modified Rankin Scale 0À2) and a poor (modified Rankin Scale 3À6) neurological outcome at 3 months. Results: Overall, 28 patients (34%) achieved good neurological outcome at 3 months. Recanalizers were significantly more likely to achieve good outcome (61% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.0001), had lower mortality (24% vs. 49%, P = 0.03) and similar rates of parenchymal haematoma type 2 (9.8% vs. 7.3%, P = 1) compared to non-recanalizers. Regression modelling identified DWI-ASPECTS >2 [odds ratio (OR) 6.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-45.76, P = 0.04), glycaemia ≤6.8 mmol/l (OR 4.05; 95% CI 1.09-15.0, P = 0.03) and thrombolysis (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.04-12.9, P = 0.04) as independent predictors of good neurological outcome. Conclusions: In patients with DWI-ASPECTS ≤5, two-thirds of patients experienced good neurological outcome when recanalized by state-of-the-art thrombectomy, whilst only one in 14 non-recanalizers achieved similar outcomes. Pretreatment markers of good neurological outcomes were DWI-ASPECTS >2, intravenous thrombolysis and glycaemia ≤6.8 mmol/l.

No abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:The Analysis of Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm (ARETA) prospective study aims to determine factors predicting recurrence after endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. In this publication, we review endovascular techniques and present the study population. Characteristics of treated and untreated unruptured aneurysms were analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Sixteen neurointerventional departments prospectively enrolled patients treated for ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms between December 2013 and May 2015. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and endovascular techniques were recorded. RESULTS:A total of 1289 patients with 1761 intracranial aneurysms, 835 (47.4%) ruptured, were enrolled. Of these, 1359 intracranial aneurysms were treated by endovascular means. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms were treated by coiling and balloon-assisted coiling in 97.8% of cases. In unruptured intracranial aneurysms, the rates of flow diversion, flow disruption, and stent-assisted coiling were 11.6%, 6.9%, and 7.8%, respectively. Rupture status and aneurysm location, neck diameter, and sac size significantly influenced the chosen technique. Treated unruptured intracranial aneurysms, compared with untreated counterparts, had larger aneurysm sacs (7.6 Ϯ 4.0 versus 3.4 Ϯ 2.0 mm; P Ͻ 0.001) and neck dimensions (4.1 Ϯ 2.2 versus 2.4 Ϯ 1.3 mm; P Ͻ 0.001) and more frequently an irregular form (84.6% versus 44.4%; P Ͻ 0.001). Also, its location influenced whether an unruptured intracranial aneurysm was treated.