Background: Immunotherapy represents a promising option for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients but its efficacy is currently inconsistent and unpredictable. Locoregional therapies inducing immunogenic cell death, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), have the potential to act synergistically with immunotherapy. For the development of new approaches combining locoregional treatments with immunotherapy, a better understanding of the respective effects of TACE and SIRT on recruitment and activation of immune cells in HCC is needed. To address this question, we compared intra-tumor immune infiltrates in resected HCC after preoperative treatment with TACE or SIRT. Methods: Data fromr patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for HCC, without preoperative treatment (SURG, n = 32), after preoperative TACE (TACE, n = 16), or preoperative SIRT (n = 12) were analyzed. Clinicopathological factors, tumorinfiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, and granzyme B (GZB) expression in resected HCC, and postoperative overall and progression-free survival were compared between the three groups. Results: Clinicopathological and surgical characteristics were similar in the three groups. A significant increase in TILs, CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, and GZB expression was observed in resected HCC in SIRT as compared to TACE and SURG groups. No difference in immune infiltrates was observed between TACE and SURG patients. Within the SIRT group, the dose of irradiation affected the type of immune infiltrate. A significantly higher ratio of CD3 + cells was observed in the peri-tumoral area in patients receiving < 100 Gy, whereas a higher ratio of intra-tumoral CD4 + cells was observed in patients receiving > 100 Gy. Postoperative outcomes were similar in all groups. Irrespective of the preoperative treatment, the type and extent of immune infiltrates did not influence postoperative survival.
@ERSpublicationsClinicians must take into account FEV1 changes when using FENO as a marker of asthma control http://ow.ly/XFmp30c4emjCite this article as: Michils A, Haccuria A, Michiels S, et al. ABSTRACT Changes in airway calibre have the potential to modify exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FENO) values and could hamper how FENO captures changes in asthma control. Here, our objective was to assess whether forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) variations alter the ability of FENO to reflect asthma control.FENO, asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)) and FEV1 were measured at least two times in 527 patients during 1819 pairs of visits. Determinants of FENO-ACQ discordance probability were evaluated through a logistic regression analysis. The effectiveness of FENO at capturing either asthma control worsening or improvement between two visits was then assessed by undertaking a stratified receiver operating characteristic curves analysis.When FEV1 and FENO change in the same direction, the odds of FENO-ACQ being discordant are multiplied by 3 ( p<0.001). The area under the curve values were 0.765 (95% CI 0.713-0.805) (improvement; p<0.001) and 0.769 (95% 0.706-0.810) (worsening; p<0.001) or 0.590 (95% 0.531-0.653) (improvement; p=0.001) and 0.498 (95% 0.416-0.567) (worsening; p=0.482) when FEV1 and FENO changed in the opposite or same direction, respectively.The manner in which FENO and FEV1 vary concomitantly when asthma control changes determines the ability of FENO to capture this change: parallel or opposite changes in FEV1 and FENO either decrease or increase this ability to capture asthma control changes.This article has supplementary material available from
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.