Our data demonstrates that the complementary use of sonoelastography definitely improves the performance in breast diagnostics. Finally we present a protocol of how sonoelastography can be integrated into our daily practice.

The idea of an automated whole breast ultrasound was developed three decades ago. We present our initial experiences with the latest technical advance in this technique, the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) ACUSON S2000™. Volume data sets were collected from 50 patients and a database containing 23 women with no detectable lesions in conventional ultrasound (BI-RADS®-US 1), 13 women with clearly benign lesions (BI-RADS®-US 2), and 14 women with known breast cancer (BI-RADS®-US 5) was created. An independent examiner evaluated the ABVS data on a separate workstation without any prior knowledge of the patients’ histories. The diagnostic accuracy for the experimental ABVS was 66.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.9–79.1). The independent examiner detected all breast cancers in the volume data resulting in a calculated sensitivity of 100% in the described setting (95% CI: 73.2%–100%). After the ABVS examination, there were a high number of requests for second-look ultrasounds in 47% (95% CI: 30.9–63.5) of the healthy women (with either a clearly benign lesion or no breast lesions at all in conventional handheld ultrasound). Therefore, the specificity remained at 52.8% (95% CI: 35.7–69.2). When comparing the concordance of the ABVS with the gold standard (conventional handheld ultrasound), Cohen’s Kappa value as an estimation of the inter-rater reliability was κ = 0.37, indicating fair agreement. In conclusion, the ABVS must still be regarded as an experimental technique for breast ultrasound, which definitely needs to undergo further evaluation studies.

Objectives Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known to have unique molecular, clinical, and pathologic characteristics. The growth pattern of this cancer may also affect its appearance on sonography. Our study evaluated the sonographic features of TNBC according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System sonographic classification system and compared these features with those of non‐TNBC. Methods Data from 315 consecutive breast cancer cases were collected. The images were reevaluated by an examiner blinded to the patients' characteristics and histologic results according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. The sonographic features of TNBC (n = 33) and non‐TNBC (n = 282) were compared. Results Triple‐negative breast cancer was significantly correlated with a younger patient age (P = .002) and was associated with higher tumor grades (P < .001), more lymph node involvement (P = .014), and a trend toward a larger tumor size. With regard to sonographic features, the margin of TNBC was more frequently described as lobulated or microlobulated (75.8% versus 49.5% in non‐TNBC; P = .005). The echoic halo was observed significantly less often in TNBC than in non‐TNBC(39.4% versus 62.8%; P = .014). Cooper ligaments were displaced rather than disrupted in TNBC compared to non‐TNBC (P = .003). Regarding the posterior acoustic features, enhancement was observed significantly more often in TNBC (36.4% versus 13.0% in non‐TNBC; P = .031). Conclusions Triple‐negative breast cancer and non‐TNBC have different sonographic features. This finding can be explained by the pathologic profile of this breast cancer subtype. Some of the distinct sonographic criteria for TNBC are more likely to be associated with benign masses. Knowledge of the distinct sonographic features of TNBC would help the examiner avoid false‐negative classification of this tumor type.