A cute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially lifethreatening disease, spanning a wide spectrum of clinical outcomes.1 Hemodynamically stable patients with preserved right ventricular (RV) size and function are classified as lowrisk patients and have an excellent short-term prognosis once therapeutic levels of anticoagulation therapy are established. 2In contrast, hemodynamically unstable patients are at high risk of death from worsening RV failure and cardiogenic shock, with a hospital mortality rate >15%. 3,4 Approximately one quarter of hemodynamically stable patients with PE are at intermediate risk, with mortality rates ranging from 3% to 15% if imaging or biomarker evidence of RV dilatation or dysfunction is present. 5,6 Editorial see p 420 Clinical Perspective on p 486Systemic thrombolysis improves hemodynamic parameters 7 and reverses RV dilatation and dysfunction 8,9 but is associated with rates of major bleeding complications in up to 20% and intracranial hemorrhage in up to 3%.10,11 Systemic thrombolysis is standard treatment for high-risk PE 2,11 ; however, it is withheld in more than two thirds of such patients. 4,12 The use of systemicBackground-In patients with acute pulmonary embolism, systemic thrombolysis improves right ventricular (RV) dilatation, is associated with major bleeding, and is withheld in many patients at risk. This multicenter randomized, controlled trial investigated whether ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) is superior to anticoagulation alone in the reversal of RV dilatation in intermediate-risk patients. Methods and Results-Fifty-nine patients (63±14 years) with acute main or lower lobe pulmonary embolism and echocardiographic RV to left ventricular dimension (RV/LV) ratio ≥1.0 were randomized to receive unfractionated heparin and an USAT regimen of 10 to 20 mg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator over 15 hours (n=30; USAT group) or unfractionated heparin alone (n=29; heparin group). Primary outcome was the difference in the RV/LV ratio from baseline to 24 hours. Safety outcomes included death, major and minor bleeding, and recurrent venous thromboembolism at 90 days. In the USAT group, the mean RV/LV ratio was reduced from 1.28±0.19 at baseline to 0.99±0.17 at 24 hours (P<0.001); in the heparin group, mean RV/LV ratios were 1.20±0.14 and 1.17±0.20, respectively (P=0.31). The mean decrease in RV/LV ratio from baseline to 24 hours was 0.30±0.20 versus 0.03±0.16 (P<0.001), respectively. At 90 days, there was 1 death (in the heparin group), no major bleeding, 4 minor bleeding episodes (3 in the USAT group and 1 in the heparin group; P=0.61), and no recurrent venous thromboembolism. Conclusions-In

Continuation or short-term interruption of NOAC is safe strategies for most invasive procedures. Patients at cardiovascular risk undergoing major procedures may benefit from heparin bridging, but bleeding risks need to be considered.

Key Points• In a real-world setting, annualized bleeding rates of major rivaroxaban bleeding are lower than those reported for vitamin K antagonists.• Treatment of major rivaroxaban bleeding is simple and rarely requires pro-coagulants; outcome at 90 days is better than that reported for vitamin K antagonists.Worldwide, rivaroxaban is increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and treatment of venous thromboembolism, but little is known about rivaroxaban-related bleeding complications in daily care. Using data from a prospective, noninterventional oral anticoagulation registry of daily care patients (Dresden NOAC registry), we analyzed rates, management, and outcome of rivaroxaban-related bleeding. Between October 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013, 1776 rivaroxaban patients were enrolled. So far, 762 patients (42.9%) reported 1082 bleeding events during/within 3 days after last intake of rivaroxaban (58.9% minor, 35.0% of nonmajor clinically relevant, and 6.1% major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition). In case of major bleeding, surgical or interventional treatment was needed in 37.8% and prothrombin complex concentrate in 9.1%. In the time-to-first-event analysis, 100-patientyear rates of major bleeding were 3.1 (95% confidence interval 2.2-4.3) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and 4.1 (95% confidence interval 2.5-6.4) for venous thromboembolism patients, respectively. In the as-treated analysis, case fatality rates of bleeding leading to hospitalizations were 5.1% and 6.3% at days 30 and 90 after bleeding, respectively. Our data indicate that, in real life, rates of rivaroxaban-related major bleeding may be lower and that the outcome may at least not be worse than that of major vitamin K antagonist bleeding, and probably better. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as identifier #NCT01588119. (Blood. 2014;124(6):955-962)

Background Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence.Methods ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362.

These results show that flow-induced conversion of endothelial cells into an arterial phenotype occurs while intercellular junctions remain intact. The data place rac1 in a central multimodal regulatory position that might be important in the development of vascular diseases, such as arteriosclerosis.

И.С. ЯВЕЛОВ, д.м.н., ФГБУ «Федеральный научно-клинический центр физико-химической медицины Федерального медико-биологического агентства» В статье представлены результаты применения ривароксабана для профилактики инсульта и тромбоэмболий не в сосуды центральной нервной системы у больных с неклапанной фибрилляцией предсердий в широкой врачебной практике. Показано, что в целом эффективность и безопасность этого лекарственного средства в повсед-невной врачебной деятельности соответствует ожиданиям, сформировавшихся по итогам крупного контролируемого клинического испытания ROCKET-AF.КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: пероральные антикоагулянты, фибрилляция предсердий, ROCRET-AF, ривароксабан

AIMVitamin-K antagonists (VKA) and non-vitamin-K dependent oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been approved for anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation and patients previously treated with VKA are switched to NOAC therapy. Safety data for this switching are urgently needed. METHODSUsing data from a large regional prospective registry of daily care NOAC patients, we evaluated the safety of switching anticoagulation from VKA to dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Switching procedures and cardiovascular and bleeding events occurring within 30 days after switching were centrally adjudicated. RESULTSBetween 1 October 2011 and 18 June 2013, 2231 patients were enrolled. Of these, 716 patients were switched from VKA to NOAC. Only 410 of the 546 evaluable patients (75.1%) had a recorded INR measurement within the 10 days preceding or following the end of VKA treatment (mean INR 2.4). As of day 30, major bleeding complications were rare (0.3%; 95% CI 0.0, 1.0) with an overall bleeding rate of 12.2% (95% CI 9.8, 14.8). Major cardiovascular events occurred in 0.8% (95% CI 0.3, 1.8). There was no significant difference in outcome event rates between the subgroups of patients with or without INR testing. CONCLUSIONIn daily care, only 75% of VKA patients have an INR measurement documented before NOAC are started. On average, NOAC are started within 2 to 5 days after the last intake of VKA. However, at 30 days follow-up cardiovascular events or major bleedings were rare both in patients with and without INR testing. However, switching procedures need to be further evaluated in larger cohorts of patients. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT• Patients on vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) need to have their INR tested before a transition to a different anticoagulant. Different INR thresholds exist for different anticoagulants and for different indications, but existing recommendations have never been analyzed. • Consequently, the recommendations for switching from VKA to non-vitamin-K dependent direct oral anticoagulants (NOAC or DOAC) in the summary of product characteristics (SMPCs) of the NOACs are not evidence based.• In daily practice, considerable concerns are raised about these recommendations (initiation of NOAC at INR values <2.0 for apixaban and dabigatran in SPAF, INR <2.5 for rivaroxaban in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and INR <3.0 for rivaroxaban in stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (SPAF).• In the Rocket-AF trial, major bleeding complications were highest in the subgroup of rivaroxaban patients with VKA pre-treatment compared with the subgroups of patients without VKA pre-treatment or the subgroup of pre-treated patients randomized to warfarin. This could be an indicator that the transition from VKA pre-treatment to NOAC increases bleeding risks. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS• In daily practice, only 75% of all patients had a recorded INR measurement within 10 days before or after the end of VKA treatment. The baseline characteristics of patients receiving INR testing were not different ...

No abstract