Psychiatric screening questionnaires for deaf children and adolescents were piloted in a group of 62 children, aged 11-16 years, attending a residential school. The questionnaires, Parent's Checklist (PCL) and Teacher's Checklist (TCL) were then used to screen a group of 93 children attending one Deaf School and three Hearing Impaired Units (HIU). Psychiatric assessments were conducted with a highly structured diagnostic interview, the Child Assessment Schedule (CAS). The interview with signing deaf children was conducted with a sign language interpreter. The prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the whole group was 50.3%, 42.4% in the group attending the Deaf School and 60.9% for the group attending the HIUs. An aetiological model of psychiatric disorder in this group is proposed.
Objectives• To present the outcomes of men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation.• To determine the impact a history of radiation therapy has on the outcomes of prosthetic surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Patients and Methods• A cohort of 77 consecutive men undergoing AUS implantation for stress urinary incontinence after prostate cancer surgery, including 29 who had also been irradiated, were included in a prospective database and followed up for a mean period of 21.2 months.• Continence rates and incidence of complications, revision and cuff erosion were evaluated, with results in irradiated men compared with those of men who had undergone radical prostatectomy alone.• The effect of co-existing hypertension, diabetes mellitus and surgical approach on outcomes were also examined.
Results• Overall, the rate of social continence (0-1 pad/day) was 87% and similar in irradiated and non-irradiated men (86.2 vs 87.5%). Likewise, the incidence of infection (3.4 vs 0%), erosion (3.4 vs 2.0%) and revision surgery (10.3 vs 12.5%) were not significantly different between the groups.• There was a far greater incidence of co-existing urethral stricture disease in irradiated patients (62.1 vs 10.4%) which often complicated management; however, AUS implantation was still feasible in these men and, in four such cases, a transcorporal cuff placement was used.• There were poorer outcomes in patients with diabetes, and a greater re-operation rate in those men who underwent a transverse scrotal rather than perineal surgical approach, although the differences did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions• Previous irradiation in patients may increase the complexity of treatment because of a greater incidence of co-existing urethral stricture disease; however, these patients are still able to achieve a level of social continence similar to that of non-irradiated patients, with no discernable increase in complication rates, cuff erosion or the need for revision surgery.• AUS implantation remains the 'gold standard' for management of moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence in both irradiated and non-irradiated patients after prostate cancer treatment.
Treatment records of 94 patients treated in an experimental home-based psychiatric service and 78 control patients in standard care were collected over one year. There was a substantial reduction in in-patient care in the experimental group, both in terms of proportion admitted and duration of admissions, despite similar out-patient and general practice care. The total treatment costs were significantly larger (> 50%) for standard care when controlled for by diagnostic grouping. Costs were further examined by including all specialist psychiatric care, and by excluding patients with primary diagnoses of brain damage or alcoholism. Sensitivity analysis explored the effects of increasing the cost of home visits. The relative cost effectiveness of the experimental service persisted. Clinical and social outcome was similar in control and experimental groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.