Background: Outcomes studies following successful closed reduction of late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) reveal high rates of secondary reconstructive surgery with limited comparative data demonstrating lower rates of residual dysplasia with open reduction. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcomes, with regard to radiographic evidence of residual dysplasia and secondary reconstructive procedures, between late closed and late open reduction for DDH in patients 6 to 24 months of age at reduction. Methods: We identified all patients between 6 and 24 months of age who underwent closed or open reduction for DDH between 1980 and 2008 and were followed until at least 10 years of age. Outcomes included radiographic measurement of acetabular dysplasia after triradiate cartilage closure, development of osteonecrosis, and the need for secondary procedures for residual dysplasia. Results: One hundred and four hips underwent index closed reduction and 54 hips underwent index open reduction. There was no significant difference in the age at reduction (p = 0.07). Among the 116 hips for which initial anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were available, most closed reductions (55%) were performed in International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade-III hips whereas most open reductions (71%) were performed in IHDI grade-IV hips. Analysis of the hips that did not undergo a secondary procedure showed that those with an index open reduction had a greater lateral center-edge angle (mean and standard deviation, 27.2° ± 10.0° versus 22.4° ± 6.8° in the closed reduction cohort; p = 0.02), lower femoral head extrusion index (22.2% ± 8.9% versus 26.0% ± 6.2%; p = 0.04), and lower Sharp angle (43.3° ± 6.0° versus 46.6° ± 3.1°; p = 0.002) at triradiate closure. There was no difference in the prevalence of osteonecrosis (Bucholz-Ogden grades II, III, and IV) between the closed and open reduction cohorts (22% versus 19%, respectively; p = 0.60). Secondary procedures were performed more frequently after closed reduction than after open reduction (47% versus 30%, respectively; p = 0.03). Conclusions: In patients with late reduction of DDH, closed reduction was associated with increased residual dysplasia and it was associated with a higher rate of secondary surgery in those >12 months old despite a decreased severity of displacement based on the IHDI classification. Additional, prospective studies with assessment of functional outcomes are needed to validate these findings. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: The efficacy of preliminary traction to increase the likelihood of closed reduction and/or decrease the incidence of avascular necrosis in the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is controversial. We sought to document compliance with and effectiveness of Bryant's outpatient traction in patients with idiopathic DDH. Methods: Patients presenting between 6 and 24 months of age with idiopathic irreducible DDH were prospectively enrolled in the study. Prereduction outpatient traction was prescribed at participating surgeons' preference and parents' expressed willingness to comply with a traction protocol of at least 14 hours/ day for 4 weeks. Traction hours were documented using a validated monitor; parents also reported average daily usage. Rate of successful closed reduction and evidence of capital epiphyseal growth disturbance 1 year' and 2 years' postreduction were documented. Results: Ninety-six patients with 115 affected hips were enrolled. Reliable recorded traction hours were obtained in 31 patients with 36 affected hips. Defining compliance as 14 hours/day average use, 14 of 31 patients (45.2%) were compliant, 2 (6.5%) admitted noncompliance, while 15 (48.2%) claimed to be compliant, but were not. Overall, 68/115 hips (59.0%) were closed reduced. Age at treatment was the only demographic characteristic associated with an increased incidence of closed reduction (11.7 vs. 14.6 mo, P < 0.01). Successful closed reduction was achieved in 10/16 hips (62.5%) of compliant patients, 12/20 (60.0%) of noncompliant patients, and 43/72 (59.7%) of notraction patients. Irregular ossific nucleus development was noted 1-year postindex reduction in 5/16 (31.3%) of complaintpatient hips and 25/92 (27.2%) of noncomplaint and no-traction hips. Distorted proximal femoral epiphysis was noted at 2 years postreduction in 2/15 hips (13.3%) of compliant patients and 15/52 hips (28.8%) in noncompliant and no-traction patients. None of these differences was statistically significant. Conclusions: Parent-reported use of outpatient traction is unreliable. Four weeks of outpatient overhead Bryant's traction did not affect the rate of closed reduction or avascular necrosis in late-presenting DDH in this cohort. Level of Evidence: Level II-prospective cohort.

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether presence of an infolded limbus on hip arthrogram at index closed reduction was associated with increased residual dysplasia or secondary surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent closed reduction for dysplasia of the hip with a minimum 2-year follow-up between 1980 and 2016. Demographic data was obtained including the age at reduction and severity of dislocation based on the International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification. Arthrograms performed at time of closed reduction were separately reviewed by 3 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons to evaluate for an infolded limbus. The primary radiographic outcome was acetabular indices at 2 and 4 years postreduction. We also assessed the presence of avascular necrosis and rate of secondary reconstructive surgery for residual dysplasia. Results: A total of 182 hips in 165 patients underwent closed reduction at a mean age of 9.8 ± 4.5 mo and were followed a mean of 9.0 ± 4.9 y. An infolded limbus was identified in 20.3% (37/182) hips with substantial agreement among the 3 graders (Fleiss κ = 0.75). The frequency of labral infolding increased with the severity of dislocation (8.8%% of IHDI II, 26.7% IHDI III, and 25.0% of IHDI IV hips; P = 0.03). Hips with infolded limbus were older at reduction (12.4 ± 5.3 vs. 9.2 ± 5.8 mo, P = 0.001). The mean acetabular index was higher in hips with infolded limbus than hips without at 2 years postreduction (34.8 ± 4.8 vs. 32.6 ± 5.8 degrees, respectively; P = 0.04). However, multivariate analysis revealed that only the severity of dislocation predicted dysplasia at 2 years postreduction. No significant difference in acetabular index was seen at 4 years postreduction (27.2 ± 7.4 vs. 25.4 ± 6.5 degrees, P = 0.24). There was no difference in avascular necrosis between groups (P = 0.74). There was no difference in rate of secondary surgery between hips with labral infolding and those without (35% vs. 30%, respectively; P = 0.52). Conclusions: An infolded limbus was more common in older patients with more severe dislocations. However, it is not associated with increased residual dysplasia or secondary surgery and may have limited utility in decision-making during closed reduction.