Although stems improve initial mechanical stability in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), ideal indications, proper lengths and diameters, and appropriate fixation methods remain controversial. The topics of the present article include the indications, selection of lengths and diameters, and fixation methods of stems in revision TKA. The use of a stem in revision TKA can protect the juxta-articular bone. A stem cannot be a substitute for optimal component fixation; it plays an adjunctive role in transferring the loads from the compromised metaphysis to the stronger diaphysis. Proper bone surface preparation and appropriate use of the stem based on a great store of knowledge are required to support the stemmed components effectively in revision TKA. The balance between overshielding and overloading the juxta-articular bone would provide excellent structural protection. The stem length and diameter should be tailored according to patients’ anatomical characteristics and determined fixation strategy. There are two traditional methods of stem fixation including the total cementation technique and the hybrid technique with a cementless press-fit stem. Selection of a cementation technique should be based on thorough consideration of advantages and disadvantages of each technique.

No abstract

PurposeIn the present study, the early results of sensor‐assisted versus manually balanced posterior‐stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis with varus deformities were prospectively compared. MethodsFifty patients undergoing sensor‐assisted TKA (group S) and 50 patients receiving manually balanced TKA (group M) were prospectively compared. The groups did not differ in terms of demographics, preoperative clinical status, or severity of deformity. The knee and function scores (KS and FS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated clinically. The mechanical axes and positions of components were assessed radiographically. In sensor‐assisted TKA, the medial and lateral compartment loads were compared based on the patellar positions of inversion and eversion. ResultsThere was no between‐group difference in the postoperative KS or FS (n.s., respectively). The average postoperative WOMAC score was 17.0 in group S and 18.0 in group M (n.s.). The ROM was 131.2° in group S and 130.8° in group M (n.s.). Neither the postoperative alignment of the mechanical axis nor the component positioning differed between the groups (n.s.). In sensor‐assisted TKA, the difference between the medial and lateral compartment loads was less than 15 lbs (6.8 kg) in each knee. The lateral compartment load increased after patellar eversion (p < 0.001). ConclusionThere are concerns about the cost–benefit ratio of the intraoperative load sensor, despite its advantage of more precisely assessing ligament balance without patellar eversion, which resulted in a smaller lateral gap. A long‐term follow‐up study with a large cohort is required. Level of evidenceII.

PurposeThe purposes of this study were to compare clinical results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the Attune and PFC Sigma knee designs and to investigate whether the use of the Attune prosthesis increased the risk of patellar injury in Asian patients.Materials and MethodsThree hundred knees that underwent TKA using Attune (group A) were compared to 300 knees that underwent TKA using PFC Sigma (group B). The Knee Society Knee Score (KS) and Function Score (FS), and range of motion (ROM) were compared. The residual patellar thickness was compared to evaluate the risk of patellar injury.ResultsThe postoperative KS and ROM of group A were better than those of group B (93.1 vs. 88.8, p<0.001 and 131.4° vs. 129.0°, p=0.008, respectively). The postoperative FS did not differ significantly between the two groups (80.9 vs. 78.7, p=0.427). The residual patella was thinner in group A (14.8 mm vs. 15.7 mm, p=0.003), which made up a higher proportion of the high-risk group for patellar fractures with a residual thickness of <12 mm (7.5% vs. 2.1%, p=0.003).ConclusionsTKA using the Attune prosthesis provided more favorable clinical results than TKA using PFC Sigma. However, the risk of injury in the residual patella was increased with use of the Attune prosthesis in Asian patients.

II.

No abstract

Recent literature has implicated a thick cobalt chromium baseplate as a potential source of stress shielding and medial tibial bone resorption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a Western population. The purpose was to calculate the incidence of various types and severity of medial tibial bone resorption utilizing a novel classification system after TKA with a thick cobalt chromium baseplate in Asian patients. Five hundred TKAs using Attune prostheses with mean follow-up of 3.4 years were evaluated, using the prospective radiographic data. The mean age was 71.3 years. The preoperative mechanical axis was varus, 11.2 degrees. The type and severity of medial tibial bone resorption were categorized as type U (resorption under the tibial baseplate up to 50% [U1] or beyond 50% [U2] of medial tibial tray width), C (resorption around the penetrated cement under the baseplate), and M (resorption on the medial tibial cortex without extension to the baseplate). Bone resorption of medial proximal tibia was observed in 96 knees (19.2%). Types U1 and U2 were seen in 46 and 28 knees, respectively. Type C was observed in 12 knees and type M in 10 knees. The type U resorption group had significantly more preoperative varus deformity (varus 12.9 vs. 10.9 degrees, p = 0.017). Medial tibial bone resorption after TKAs using a thick cobalt chromium baseplate is not uncommon and has various locations, types, and severities. The medial tibial bone resorption might be related to various causes, including stress shielding, thermal necrosis from cement in the bony hole, and bony devascularization. The type-U resorption has to be closely observed in patients with preoperative severe varus deformity. This is a Level IV study.

No abstract