Head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) for human subjects in anechoic space were modeled with modified phase spectra, including minimum-phase-plus-delay, linear-phase, and reversed-phase-plus-delay functions. The overall (wide-band) interaural time delay (ITD) for the modeled HRTFs was made consistent with that of the empirical HRTFs by setting the position-dependent, frequency-independent delay in the HRTF for the lagging ear. Signal analysis of the minimum-phase-plus-delay reconstructions indicated that model HRTFs deviate from empirical HRTF measurements maximally for contralateral azimuths and low elevations. Subjects assessed the perceptual validity of the model HRTFs in a four-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice discrimination paradigm. Results indicate that monaural discrimination performance of subjects was at chance for all three types of HRTF models. Binaural discrimination performance was at chance for the linear-phase HRTFs, was above chance for some locations for the minimum-phase-plus-delay HRTFs, and was above chance for all tested locations for the reversed-phase-plus-delay HRTFs. An analysis of low-frequency timing information showed that all of these results are consistent with efficient use of interaural time differences in the low-frequency components of the stimulus waveforms. It is concluded that listeners are insensitive to HRTF phase spectra as long as the overall ITD of the low-frequency components does not provide a reliable cue. In particular, the minimum-phase-plus-delay approximation to the HRTF phase spectrum is an adequate approximation as long as the low-frequency ITD is appropriate. These results and conclusions are all limited to the anechoic case when the HRTFs correspond to brief impulse responses limited to a few milliseconds.
Hit and false-alarm rates were measured for detection of a 500-Hz tone target in each of ten reproducible samples of 1/3-oct bandwidth noise centered at 500 Hz for both NoS pi and NoSo conditions. The effects on hit rates of the starting phase of the target relative to individual noise samples were investigated with two target phase angles for three subjects. The major results are: (1) performance varies significantly over masker waveforms; (2) for NoS pi conditions, the effect of target-to-marker phase angle on hit rates is not significant for these narrow-band maskers; (3) for NoSo conditions, the target-to-masker phase angle has a large effect; (4) no significant correlation between NoSo performance and NoS pi performance is seen across masker waveforms. These results are generally consistent wuth previously reported results for wideband maskers [R.H. Gilkey, D.E. Robinson, and T.E. Hanna, "Effects of masker waveform and signal-to-masker phase relation on diotic and dichotic masking by reproducible noise," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1207-1219 (1985)] with an important exception. Specifically, in the wideband experiment, significant correlation between NoSo and NoS pi performance across noise samples was found. In addition, in the wideband experiment, a small yet statistically significant effect of target-to-masker phase was observed in the NoS pi condition.
Producing the necessary magnetic field strengths from a wireless or cordless telephone's handset in an in-use vertical orientation is vital for compatibility with the vast majority of behind-the-ear aids. Due to the very wide range of preferred magnetic signal levels shown, only indirect conclusions can be drawn concerning required signal levels. The strong preference for a 65 dB SPL equivalent level can be combined with established standards addressing hearing aid performance to derive reasonable source level requirements. Greater consistency between in-the-field hearing aid telecoil and microphone sensitivity adjustments could yield improved results for some users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.