P reexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) using FDA-approved antiretroviral (ARV) drugs holds significant promise as a strategy in the prevention of HIV infection. By analogy to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), a combination of ARV agents likely is essential for optimally effective HIV PrEP (1, 2). Multiple HIV PrEP clinical trials have demonstrated that vaginal and oral ARV regimens based on the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) tenofovir (TFV) can be effective in susceptible men, women, and partners of HIV-infected individuals (3-9), but other studies based on analogous drug regimens were unsuccessful at reducing the rates of HIV acquisition (10-12). A critical factor driving success in these trials appears to involve sustaining high adherence to frequent dosing (13).Adherence to therapy was found to be inversely related to dosing periods across different delivery methods (14-17). Topical delivery of ARV drugs using intravaginal rings (IVRs) is believed to improve adherence (18) while maintaining sustained mucosal microbicide levels independently of coitus and daily dosing (19). A recent phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 2,629 African women evaluating a monthly IVR delivering the nonnucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor dapivirine (DPV) showed that this dosing modality can be effective at preventing HIV-1 infection (20). Overall, the incidence of HIV-1 infection in the DPV group was lower by 37% than that in the placebo group, following the exclusion of data from two sites that exhibited lower-than-expected protocol and product adherence. The efficacy of HIV-1 prevention was as high as 61% among women 25 years of age or older. However, the delivery of two or more ARV drugs by the use of conventional IVR designs, such as the DPV IVR, involves significant technological and manufacturing hurdles. To meet these challenges, we have developed a novel IVR technology, the pod-IVR (19,21), that enables rapid development of devices capable of delivering multiple agents over a wide range of target delivery rates and levels of aqueous solubility (22)(23)(24)(25).Here, we report on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary local safety in an ovine model of a pod-IVR delivering the prodrug TFV disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in combination with maraviroc (MVC), an entry inhibitor/antagonist of chemokine receptor CCR5. Steady-state drug levels for both ARV agents in cervicovaginal fluids (CVFs) were sustained over the 28-day study with corresponding vaginal tissue (VT) concentrations above the levels required for putative efficacy in preventing HIV infection.
Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may prevent HIV infection in a significant number of HIV-1 negative individuals in venerable populations; however, trial efficacy has been highly variable, with notable successes and failures. Poor adherence to PrEP regimens has been implicated as a primary factor in determining efficacy of these trials. With the exception of CAPRISA 004 where use of a pericoital tenofovir gel led to a 39% reduction in HIV infection, all successful PrEP regimens to date have used the disoproxil fumarate ester prodrug of tenofovir (TDF) alone or in combination with emtricitabine (FTC). A sustained-release, intravaginal ring (IVR) formulation of TDF holds promise for improving adherence and, thus, increasing the effectiveness of PrEP. Here, a novel IVR delivering TDF with sustained zero-order release characteristics that may be controlled over nearly two orders of magnitude is described. Pod-IVRs containing 1-10 pods delivering TDF at 0.01 – 10 mg d−1 were fabricated and their release characteristics evaluated in vitro. The pod-IVRs stabilized TDF against hydrolytic degradation both in storage and during in vitro release experiments. Successful translation of the TDF pod-IVR from laboratory evaluation to large-scale clinical trials requires the ability to manufacture the devices at low cost and in high quantity. Methods for manufacturing and scale-up were developed and applied to pilot-scale production of TDF pod-IVRs that maintained the IVR’s release characteristics while significantly decreasing the variability in release rate observed between pod-IVRs. This pod-IVR enables for the first time the dose-ranging clinical studies that are required to optimize topical TDF PrEP in terms of efficacy and safety.
Topical preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against HIV has been marginally successful in recent clinical trials with low adherence rates being a primary factor for failure. Controlled, sustained release of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs may help overcome these low adherence rates if the product is protective for extended periods of time. The oral combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) is currently the only FDA-approved ARV drug for HIV PrEP. A novel pod-intravaginal ring (IVR) delivering TDF and FTC at independently controlled rates was evaluated for efficacy at preventing SHIV162p3 infection in a rigorous, repeat low-dose vaginal exposure model using normally cycling female pigtailed macaques. Six macaques received pod-IVRs containing TDF (65 mg) and FTC (68 mg) every two weeks, and weekly vaginal exposures to 50 TCID50 of SHIV162p3 began one week after the first pod-IVR insertion. All pod-IVR-treated macaques were fully protected throughout the study (P = 0.0002, Log-rank test), whereas all control animals became infected with a median of 4 exposures to infection. The topical, sustained release of TDF and FTC from the pod-IVR maintained protective drug levels in macaques over four months of virus exposures. This novel and versatile delivery system has the capacity to deliver and maintain protective levels of multiple drugs and the protection observed here warrants clinical evaluation of this pod-IVR design.
BackgroundIntravaginal rings (IVRs) for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) theoretically overcome some adherence concerns associated with frequent dosing that can occur with oral or vaginal film/gel regimens. An innovative pod-IVR, composed of an elastomer scaffold that can hold up to 10 polymer-coated drug cores (or “pods”), is distinct from other IVR designs as drug release from each pod can be controlled independently. A pod-IVR has been developed for the delivery of tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in combination with emtricitabine (FTC), as daily oral TDF-FTC is the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved regimen for HIV PrEP. A triple combination IVR building on this platform and delivering TDF-FTC along with the antiretroviral (ARV) agent maraviroc (MVC) also is under development.Methodology and findingsThis pilot Phase I trial conducted between June 23, 2015, and July 15, 2016, evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and acceptability of pod-IVRs delivering 3 different ARV regimens: 1) TDF only, 2) TDF-FTC, and 3) TDF-FTC-MVC over 7 d. The crossover, open-label portion of the trial (N = 6) consisted of 7 d of continuous TDF pod-IVR use, a wash-out phase, and 7 d of continuous TDF-FTC pod-IVR use. After a 3-mo pause to evaluate safety and PK of the TDF and TDF-FTC pod-IVRs, TDF-FTC-MVC pod-IVRs (N = 6) were evaluated over 7 d of continuous use. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), colposcopy, and culture-independent analysis of the vaginal microbiome (VMB). Drug and drug metabolite concentrations in plasma, cervicovaginal fluids (CVFs), cervicovaginal lavages (CVLs), and vaginal tissue (VT) biopsies were determined via liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Perceptibility and acceptability were assessed by surveys and interviews. Median participant age was as follows: TDF/TDF-FTC group, 26 y (range 24–35 y), 2 White, 2 Hispanic, and 2 African American; TDF-FTC-MVC group, 24.5 y (range 21–41 y), 3 White, 1 Hispanic, and 2 African American. Reported acceptability was high for all 3 products, and pod-IVR use was confirmed by residual drug levels in used IVRs. There were no serious adverse events (SAEs) during the study. There were 26 AEs reported during TDF/TDF-FTC IVR use (itching, discharge, discomfort), with no differences between TDF alone or in combination with FTC observed. In the TDF-FTC-MVC IVR group, there were 12 AEs (itching, discharge, discomfort) during IVR use regardless of attribution to study product. No epithelial disruption/thinning was seen by colposcopy, and no systematic VMB shifts were observed. Median (IQR) tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) tissue concentrations of 303 (277–938) fmol/106 cells (TDF), 289 (110–603) fmol/106 cells (TDF-FTC), and 302 (177.1–823.8) fmol/106 cells (TDF-FTC-MVC) were sustained for 7 d, exceeding theoretical target concentrations for vaginal HIV prevention. The study’s main limitations include the small sample size, short duration (7 d versus 28 d), and the lack of FTC triphosphate measurements in VT biopsies....
An ion chromatographic method with conductivity detection for the precise and accurate analysis of lithium ions in phosphate-buffered saline, used as a cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) fluid, was developed and validated. The lithium ion dilution factor during the CVL is used to calculate the volume of cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) collected. Initial CVL Li+ concentrations of 1 mM and 10 mM were evaluated. The method is robust, practical, and afforded an accurate measurement (5% of the measurement, or better) at 24 μL of vaginal fluid simulant collected per mL of CVL fluid, as low as 5 μL mL−1 using 10 mM Li+ with a measurement accuracy of 6.7%. Ion chromatograms of real-world CVL samples collected in vivo from common animal models (sheep and pig-tailed macaque) and a human volunteer demonstrate that the analysis is interference-free. The method is readily transferrable and should enable the accurate measurement of CVF volume collected during CVLs benefitting a broad range of research disciplines, including pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, metabolomic, and microbiome studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.