Objective To compare the effects of two different intraoperative CO2 pressures (8 and 15 mmHg) during laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies in terms of postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain, laparoscopy‐mediated vegetative alterations, pain medication requirement, arterial CO2 pressure (pCO2), surgical parameters, and safety. Design Prospective randomised controlled study. Setting German university hospital. Population Female patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies. Methods Patients were randomised to a standard pressure (SP; 15 mmHg, control) or low‐pressure (LP; 8 mmHg, experimental) group. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain intensities, measured via numeric rating scale (NRS) and vegetative parameters (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, bloating) at 3, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain medication requirement (mg) and arterial pCO2 (mmHg). Surgical parameters and intra‐ and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results In total, 178 patients were included. Patients in the LP group (n = 91) showed significantly lower postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain scores, fewer vegetative alterations, lower pain medication requirements, a shorter postoperative hospitalization, and lower intra‐ and postoperative arterial pCO2 values compared with the SP group (n = 87; P ≤ 0.01). No differences in intra‐ and postoperative complications were observed between groups. Conclusions Low‐pressure laparoscopy seems to be an effective and safe technique for the reduction of postoperative pain and laparoscopy‐induced metabolic and vegetative alterations following laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. Tweetable abstract Low‐pressure laparoscopy seems to be an effective and safe technique for reduction of pain following laparoscopic hysterectomy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.