There is longstanding interest in the relationship between motor imagery, action observation, and movement execution. Several models propose that these tasks recruit the same brain regions in a similar manner; however, there is no quantitative synthesis of the literature that compares their respective networks. Here we summarized data from neuroimaging experiments examining Motor Imagery (303 experiments, 4,902 participants), Action Observation (595 experiments, 11,032 participants), and related control tasks involving Movement Execution (142 experiments, 2,302 participants). Motor Imagery recruited a network of premotor-parietal cortical regions, alongside the thalamus, putamen, and cerebellum. Action Observation involved a cortical premotor-parietal and occipital network, with no consistent subcortical contributions. Movement Execution engaged sensorimotor-premotor areas, and the thalamus, putamen, and cerebellum. Comparisons across these networks highlighted key differences in their recruitment of motor cortex and parietal cortex, and subcortical structures. Conjunction across all three tasks identified a consistent premotor-parietal and somatosensory network. These data amend previous models of the relationships between motor imagery, action observation, and movement execution, and quantify the relationships between their respective networks.Keywords: Action Simulation, Motor Simulation, Functional Equivalence, Mental Imagery, Action Observation System, Mirror Neurons Highlights:• We compared quantitative meta-analyses of movement imagery, observation, and execution• Subcortical structures were most commonly associated with imagery and execution• Conjunctions identified a consistent premotor-parietal-somatosensory network• These data can inform basic and translational work using imagery and observation . CC-BY 4.0 International license peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under a

Brain structure scaffolds intrinsic function, supporting cognition and ultimately behavioral flexibility. However, it remains unclear how a static, genetically controlled architecture supports flexible cognition and behavior. Here, we synthesize genetic, phylogenetic and cognitive analyses to understand how the macroscale organization of structure-function coupling across the cortex can inform its role in cognition. In humans, structure-function coupling was highest in regions of unimodal cortex and lowest in transmodal cortex, a pattern that was mirrored by a reduced alignment with heritable connectivity profiles. Structure-function uncoupling in non-human primates had a similar spatial distribution, but we observed an increased coupling between structure and function in association regions in macaques relative to humans. Meta-analysis suggested regions with the least genetic control (low heritable correspondence and different across primates) are linked to social cognition and autobiographical memory. Our findings establish the genetic and evolutionary uncoupling of structure and function in different transmodal systems may support the emergence of complex, culturally embedded forms of cognition.

There is significant interest in using brain imaging data to predict non-brain-imaging phenotypes in individual participants. However, most prediction studies are underpowered, relying on less than a few hundred participants, leading to low reliability and inflated prediction performance. Yet, small sample sizes are unavoidable when studying clinical populations or addressing focused neuroscience questions. Here, we propose a simple framework - "meta-matching" - to translate predictive models from large-scale datasets to new unseen non-brain-imaging phenotypes in boutique studies. The key observation is that many large-scale datasets collect a wide range inter-correlated phenotypic measures. Therefore, a unique phenotype from a boutique study likely correlates with (but is not the same as) some phenotypes in some large-scale datasets. Meta-matching exploits these correlations to boost prediction in the boutique study. We applied meta-matching to the problem of predicting non-brain-imaging phenotypes using resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC). Using the UK Biobank (N = 36,848), we demonstrated that meta-matching can boost the prediction of new phenotypes in small independent datasets by 100% to 400% in many scenarios. When considering relative prediction performance, meta-matching significantly improved phenotypic prediction even in samples with 10 participants. When considering absolute prediction performance, meta-matching significantly improved phenotypic prediction when there were least 50 participants. With a growing number of large-scale population-level datasets collecting an increasing number of phenotypic measures, our results represent a lower bound on the potential of meta-matching to elevate small-scale boutique studies.

No abstract

Background: It is a key concern in psychiatric research to investigate objective measures to support and ultimately improve diagnostic processes. Current gold standard diagnostic procedures for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are mainly subjective and prone to bias. Objective measures such as neuropsychological measures and EEG markers show limited specificity. Recent studies point to alterations of voice and speech production to reflect psychiatric symptoms also related to ADHD. However, studies investigating voice in large clinical samples allowing for individual-level prediction of ADHD are lacking. The aim of this study was to explore a role of prosodic voice measures as objective marker of ADHD. Methods: 1005 recordings were analyzed from 387 ADHD patients, 204 healthy controls, and 100 clinical (psychiatric) controls. All participants (age range 18-59 years, mean age 34.4) underwent an extensive diagnostic examination according to gold standard methods and provided speech samples (3 min in total) including free and given speech. Paralinguistic features were calculated, and random forest based classifications were performed using a 10-fold cross-validation with 100 repetitions controlling for age, sex, and education. Association of voice features and ADHD-symptom severity assessed in the clinical interview were analyzed using random forest regressions. Results and Conclusion: ADHD was predicted with AUC = 0.76. The analysis of a non-comorbid sample of ADHD resulted in similar classification performance. Paralinguistic features were associated with ADHD-symptom severity as indicated by random forest regression. In female participants, particularly with age < 32 years, paralinguistic features showed the highest classification performance (AUC = 0.86). Paralinguistic features based on derivatives of loudness and fundamental frequency seem to be promising candidates for further research into vocal acoustic biomarkers of ADHD. Given the relatively good performance in female participants independent of comorbidity, vocal measures may evolve as a clinically supportive option in the complex diagnostic process in this patient group.