Background: An anatomical double bundle ACL reconstruction replicates the anatomy of native ACL as the tunnels are made to simulate the anatomy of ACL with AM and PL bundle foot prints. The goal of anatomic ACL reconstruction is to tailor the procedure to each patient's anatomic, biomechanical and functional demands to provide the best possible outcome. The shift from single bundle to double bundle technique and also from transtibial to transportal method has been to provide near anatomic tunnel positions. Purpose: To determine the position of femoral and tibial tunnels prepared by double bundle ACL reconstruction using three dimensional Computed tomography. Study design: A prospective case series involving forty patients with ACL tear who underwent transportal double bundle ACL reconstruction. Method: Computed tomography scans were performed on forty knees that had undergone double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction models of the knee joint were prepared and aligned into an anatomical coordinate axis system for femur and tibia respectively. Tibial tunnel centres were measured in the anterior-to-posterior and medial-to-lateral directions on the top view of tibial plateau and femoral tunnel centres were measured in posterior to anterior and proximal-to-distal directions with anatomic coordinate axis method. These measurements were compared with published reference data. Results: Analysing the Femoral tunnel, the mean posterior-to-anterior distances for anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel centre position were 46.8% ± 7.4% and 34.5% ± 5.0% of the posterior-to-anterior height of the medial wall and the mean proximal-to-distal distances for the anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel centre position were 24.1% ± 7.1% and 61.6% ± 4.8%. On the tibial side, the mean anterior-to-posterior distances for the anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel centre position were 28.8% ± 4.3% and 46.2% ± 3.6% of the anterior-to posterior depth of the tibia measured from the anterior border and the mean medial-to-lateral distances for the anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel centre position were 46.5% ± 2.9% and 50.6% ± 2.8% of the medial-to-lateral width of the tibia measured from the medial border. There is high Inter-observer and Intra-observer reliability (Intra-class correlation coefficient). Discussion and conclusion: Femoral AM tunnel was positioned significantly anterior and nearly proximal whereas the femoral PL tunnel was positioned significantly anterior and nearly distal with respect to the anatomic site. Location of tibial AM tunnel was nearly posterior and nearly medial whereas the location of tibial PL tunnel was very similar to the anatomic site Evaluation of location of tunnels through the anatomic co-ordinate axes method on 3D CT models is a reliable and reproducible method. This method would help the surgeons to aim for anatomic placement of the tunnels. It also shows that there is scope for improvement of femoral tunnel in double bundle ACL recons...
Septic arthritis of acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a rare entity. It is generally seen in patients who are immunocompromised. Only 15 cases have been reported till now, with only one case series of 6 patients. We report a case of septic arthritis of AC joint in an immunocompetent child. A 9 years old girl presented with history of pain in left shoulder for 4 days associated with fever. No history suggestive of any immunocompromised state was complained. On local examination, a swelling of around 3 cm in diameter was found over left AC joint region with raised local temperature, tenderness on palpation and positive response in fluctuation test. Total leukocyte count was 18.7 × 109/L with 80% of neutrophils. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 28 mm/1 h. C-reactive protein (CRP) was 12 mg/L. X-ray showed enlarged left AC joint space. Ultrasound revealed hypoechoic collection in the AC joint and the surrounding area. The aspirate was thick and purulent in nature, revealing Gram positive cocci at staining. Arthrotomy and thorough lavage of AC joint was done. Culture of the aspirate showed Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) after 48 hours that was sensitive to amikacin, gentamicin, erythromycin and teicoplanin. Patient was symptom-free at 2 months of follow-up with no signs of osteomyelitis on the radiographs. Thus this is the first case of AC joint septic arthritis in healthy individual. Being proximal to the shoulder joint, AC joint septic arthritis can be confused with the shoulder joint septic arthritis. Thus, high index of suspicion is required for accurate diagnosis.
<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> ACL reconstruction has become a common orthopaedic procedure. The anatomy and biomechanics of ACL have been one of the most researched and debated topics in the orthopaedic literature. This has implication on the surgical procedure too with shift from traditional transtibial to more anatomic anteromedial ACL reconstruction. Anteromedial technique results in more anatomic femoral tunnel with graft positioned at the native insertion site. The tunnel position is crucial for better outcome after ACL reconstruction. The purpose of the study was to ascertain the femoral tunnel position made by anatomic single bundle reconstruction with the help of three dimensional computer tomography.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A prospective case series involving thirty patients with ACL tear who underwent anteromedial single bundle ACL reconstruction. Computer tomography scans were performed on thirty knees that underwent single bundle anteromedial ACL reconstruction. Three dimensional models were created and the data was analyzed according to coordinate system method. Femoral tunnel position was measured in proximal to distal and posterior to anterior directions. This data was compared with the already published reference data on anatomical tunnel position.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Femoral tunnel centre on the medial wall of lateral femoral condyle was located at 35±9% in the posterior to anterior direction. In the proximal to distal direction, the tunnel was placed at 30±12%. Femoral tunnel was placed anteriorly as compared to anatomic anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel position. There was no significant difference in tunnel position in proximal to distal direction.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Femoral tunnel centre on the medial wall of lateral femoral condyle was located at 35±9% in the posterior to anterior direction. In the proximal to distal direction, the tunnel was placed at 30±12%. Femoral tunnel was placed anteriorly as compared to anatomic anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel position. There was no significant difference in tunnel position in proximal to distal direction.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.