The local structure of U(VI), U(IV), and Th(IV) sulfato complexes in aqueous solution was investigated by U-L(3) and Th-L(3) EXAFS spectroscopy for total sulfate concentrations 0.05 < or = [SO(4)(2-)] < or = 3 M and 1.0 < or = pH < or = 2.6. The sulfate coordination was derived from U-S and Th-S distances and coordination numbers. The spectroscopic results were combined with thermodynamic speciation and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. In equimolar [SO(4)(2-)]/[UO(2)(2+)] solution, a U-S distance of 3.57 +/- 0.02 Angstrom suggests monodentate coordination, in line with UO(2)SO(4)(aq) as the dominant species. With increasing [SO(4)(2-)]/[UO(2)(2+)] ratio, an additional U-S distance of 3.11 +/- 0.02 Angstrom appears, suggesting bidentate coordination in line with the predominance of the UO(2)(SO(4))(2)(2-) species. The sulfate coordination of Th(IV) and U(IV) was investigated at [SO(4)(2-)]/[M(IV)] ratios > or = 8. The Th(IV) sulfato complex comprises both, monodentate and bidentate coordination, with Th-S distances of 3.81 +/- 0.02 and 3.14 +/- 0.02 Angstrom, respectively. A similar coordination is obtained for U(IV) sulfato complexes at pH 1 with monodentate and bidentate U-S distances of 3.67 +/- 0.02 and 3.08 +/- 0.02 Angstrom, respectively. By increasing the pH value to 2, a U(IV) sulfate precipitates. This precipitate shows only a U-S distance of 3.67 +/- 0.02 Angstrom in line with a monodentate linkage between U(IV) and sulfate. Previous controversially discussed observations of either monodentate or bidentate sulfate coordination in aqueous solutions can now be explained by differences of the [SO(4)(2-)]/[M] ratio. At low [SO(4)(2-)]/[M] ratios, the monodentate coordination prevails, and bidentate coordination becomes important only at higher ratios.

Electrochemical, complexation, and electronic properties of uranyl(VI) and -(V) carbonato complexes in an aqueous Na2CO3 solution have been investigated to define the appropriate conditions for preparing pure uranyl(V) samples and to understand the difference in coordination character between UO22+ and UO2+. Cyclic voltammetry using three different working electrodes of platinum, gold, and glassy carbon has suggested that the electrochemical reaction of uranyl(VI) carbonate species proceeds quasi-reversibly. Electrolysis of UO22+ has been performed in Na2CO3 solutions of more than 0.8 M with a limited pH range of 11.7 < pH < 12.0 using a platinum mesh electrode. It produces a high purity of the uranyl(V) carbonate solution, which has been confirmed to be stable for at least 2 weeks in a sealed glass cuvette. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) measurements revealed the structural arrangement of uranyl(VI) and -(V) tricarbonato complexes, [UO2(CO3)3]n- [n = 4 for uranyl(VI), 5 for uranyl(V)]. The bond distances of U-Oax, U-Oeq, U-C, and U-Odist are determined to be 1.81, 2.44, 2.92, and 4.17 A for the uranyl(VI) complex and 1.91, 2.50, 2.93, and 4.23 A for the uranyl(V) complex, respectively. The validity of the structural parameters obtained from EXAFS has been supported by quantum chemical calculations for the uranyl(VI) complex. The uranium LI- and LIII-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectra have been interpreted in terms of electron transitions and multiple-scattering features.

Previous spectroscopic research suggested that uranium(VI) adsorption to iron oxides is dominated by ternary uranyl-carbonato surface complexes across an unexpectedly wide pH range. Formation of such complexes would have a significant impact on the sorption behavior and mobility of uranium in aqueous environments. We therefore reinvestigated the identity and structural coordination of uranyl sorption complexes using a combination of U LIII-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy and iterative transformation factor analysis, which enhances the resolution in comparison to conventional EXAFS analysis. A range of conditions (pH, CO2 partial pressure, ionic strength) made it possible to quantify the variations in surface speciation. In the resulting set of spectral data (N=11) the variance is explained by only two components, which represent two structurally different types of surface complexes: (1) a binary uranyl surface complexwith a bidentate coordination to edges of Fe(O,OH)6 octahedra and (2) a uranyl triscarbonato surface complex where one carbonate ion bridges uranyl to the surface. This ternary type B complex differs from a type A complex where uranyl is directly attached to surface atoms and carbonate is bridged by uranyl to the surface. Both surface complexes agree qualitatively and quantitatively with predictions by a charge distribution (CD) model. According to this model the edge-sharing uranyl complex has equatorial ligands (-OH2, -OH, or one -CO3 group) that point away from the surface. The monodentate uranyl triscarbonato surface complex (type B) is relevant only at high pH and elevated pC0O. At these conditions, however, it is responsible for significant uranyl sorption, whereas standard models would predict only weak sorption. This paper presents the first spectroscopic evidence of this ternary surface complex, which has significant implications for immobilization of uranyl in carbonate-rich aqueous environments.

No abstract

We employed density functional theory (DFT) calculations, and ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis), extended X-ray absorption fine-structure (EXAFS), and attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared (IR) spectroscopy analyzed with iterative transformation factor analysis (ITFA) to determine the structures and the pH-speciation of aqueous acetate (ac) and succinate (suc) U(VI) complexes. In the acetate system, all spectroscopies confirm the thermodynamically predicted pH-speciation by Ahrland (1951), with the hydrated uranyl ion and a 1:1, a 1:2 and a 1:3 U(VI)-ac complex. In the succinate system, we identified a new 1:3 U(VI)-suc complex, in addition to the previously known 1:1 and 1:2 U(VI)-suc complexes, and determined the pH-speciation for all complexes. The IR spectra show absorption bands of the antisymmetric stretching mode of the uranyl mojety (υ3(UO2)) at 949, 939, 924 cm(-1) and at 950, 938, 925 cm(-1) for the 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 U(VI)-ac and U(VI)-suc complexes, respectively. IR absorption bands at 1535 and 1534 cm(-1) and at 1465 and 1462 cm(-1) are assigned to the antisymmetric υ3,as(COO) and symmetric υ3,s(COO) stretching mode of bidentately coordinated carboxylic groups in the U(VI)-ac and U(VI)-suc complexes. The assignment of the three IR bands (υ3(UO2), υ3,as(COO), υ3,s(COO)) and the stoichiometry of the complexes is supported by DFT calculations. The UV-vis spectra of the equivalent U(VI)-ac and U(VI)-suc complexes are similar suggesting common structural features. Consistent with IR spectroscopy and DFT calculations, EXAFS showed a bidentate coordination of the carboxylic groups to the equatorial plane of the uranyl moiety for all uranyl ligand complexes except for the newly detected 1:3 U(VI)-suc complex, where two carboxylic groups coordinate bidentately and one carboxylic group coordinates monodentately. All 1:1 and 1:2 complexes have a U-Owater distance of ∼2.36 Å, which is shorter than the U-Owater distance of ∼2.40 Å of the hydrated uranyl ion. For all complexes the U-Ocarboxyl distance of the bidentately coordinated carboxylic group is ∼2.47 Å, while the monodentately coordinated carboxylic group of the 1:3 U(VI)-suc complex has a U-Ocarboxyl distance of ∼2.36 Å, that is, similar to the short U-Owater distance in the 1:1 and 1:2 complexes.

To clarify the electronic spectral properties of uranyl(V) complexes systematically, we measured absorption spectra of three types of pure uranyl(V) complexes: [U(V)O2(dbm)2DMSO]-, [U(V)O2(saloph)DMSO]-, and [U(V)O2(CO3)3]5- (dbm = dibenzoylmethanate, saloph = N,N'-disalicylidene-o-phenylenediaminate, DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide). As a result, it was found that these uranyl(V) complexes have characteristic absorption bands in the visible-near-infrared (NIR) region, i.e., at around 640, 740, 860, 1470, and 1890 nm (molar absorptivity, epsilon = 150-900 M(-1).cm(-1)) for [U(V)O2(dbm)2DMSO]-, 650, 750, 900, 1400, and 1875 nm (epsilon = 100-300 M(-1).cm(-1)) for [U(V)O2(saloph)DMSO]-, and 760, 990, 1140, 1600, and 1800 nm (epsilon = 0.2-3.6 M(-1).cm(-1)) for [U(V)O2(CO3)3]5-. These characteristic absorption bands of the uranyl(V) complexes are attributable to the electronic transitions in the U(V)O2+ core because the spectral features are similar to each other despite the differences in the ligands coordinated to the equatorial plane of the U(V)O2+ moiety. On the other hand, the epsilon values of [U(V)O2(CO3)3]5- are quite smaller than those of [U(V)O2(dbm)2DMSO]- and [U(V)O2(saloph)DMSO]-. Such differences can be explained by the different coordination geometries around the center uranium in these uranyl(V) complexes. Consequently, the absorption bands of the uranyl(V) complexes in visible-NIR region were assigned to f-f transitions in the 5f1 configuration.

The sensitive excitation of uranyl(vi) hydrolysis species in the UV (180 to 370 nm) is due to ligand-to-metal charge transfer.

We studied the structure and stoichiometry of aqueous uranylVI hydroxo dimers and trimers by spectroscopic (EXAFS, FTIR, UV-vis) and quantum chemical (DFT) methods. FTIR and UV-vis spectroscopy were used for the speciation of uranyl complexes in aqueous solution. DFT calculations show that (UO2)2(OH)22+ has two bridging hydroxo groups with a U-U distance of 3.875 A. This result is in good agreement with EXAFS, where a U-U distance of 3.88 A was found. For the hydroxo trimer complex, DFT calculations show that the species (UO2)3(O)(OH)3+ with oxo bridging in the center is energetically favored in comparison to its stoichiometric equivalent (UO2)3(OH)5+. This is again in line with the EXAFS result, where a shorter U-U distance of 3.81-3.82 A and evidence for oxo bridging in the center were found. Several stable intermediates which lie several tens of kJ/mol above that of (UO2)3(O)(OH)3+ were identified, and their structures, energies, and intramolecular proton-transfer reaction are discussed.