Controversy continues over the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy (regional versus three-field) for a potentially resectable squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus. In the Consensus Conference of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus (ISDE), held in Munich in 1994, the types of lymphadenectomy were classified as standard, extended, total, or three-field lymphadenectomy. The objective of the present study was to determine the optimal procedure among these four types of lymphadenectomy. The mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, and survival rates were compared among 302 patients who underwent curative (R0) transthoracic esophagectomy with one of these four types of lymphadenectomy at Kurume University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan, from 1986 to 1998. Three-field lymphadenectomy resulted in better survival than any other type of lymphadenectomy for patients with positive lymph node metastasis from a cancer in the upper or middle thoracic esophagus. A postoperative complication, such as recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, anastomotic leakage, and tracheal ischemic lesion, was significantly more common after three-field lymphadenectomy. However, the mortality rate was the same among the four procedures. Three-field lymphadenectomy was optimal for an upper or middle thoracic esophageal cancer with metastasis in the lymph node(s) based on improved long-term survival, whereas there was not a large difference in short-term and long-term outcomes after the four types of lymphadenectomy for a lower thoracic esophageal cancer.

The need for surgery after chemoradiotherapy for a T4N0-1M0 squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus was evaluated. A series of 53 patients were enrolled in this prospective nonrandomized trial from among 124 patients with an esophageal cancer assessed as T4 in Kurume University Hospital from 1994 to 2002. After the first chemoradiotherapy cycle, which consisted of radiotherapy in a total dosage of 36 Gy and chemotherapy using cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU), the patients each decided, after being informed of the efficacy of the chemoradiotherapy, whether to undergo surgery. All patients, including those who had undergone surgery and those who had not, later underwent a second chemoradiotherapy cycle consisting of radiotherapy in a total dosage of 24 Gy and chemotherapy using CDDP and 5FU, as far as practicable. Among the responders to the first chemoradiotherapy cycle, there was no significant difference in the long-term (5-year) survival rate between the 18 patients who underwent esophageal surgery and the 13 patients who did not (23% vs. 23%). Among the nonresponders, the 11 patients who underwent surgery showed a tendency toward longer survival than the five patients who had had no surgery. The nonresponders had 1- and 2-year survival rates of 64% and 33%, respectively. The corresponding rates for the 5 nonsurgical patients who completed the two chemoradiotherapy cycle were 20% and 20%, respectively. For a T4N0-1M0 squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus, full-dosage chemoradiotherapy (definitive chemoradiotherapy) is preferred for responders to a half-dose of chemoradiotherapy as much as esophagectomy, whereas esophagectomy may be preferred for nonresponders.

Esophageal cancer patients with distant organ metastasis have usually been treated only to palliate symptoms without multimodality therapy. The current study evaluates the role of multimodality therapy in esophageal squamous cell cancer patients with distant organ metastasis. Between February 1988 and January 2007, 80 esophageal squamous cell cancer patients with distant organ metastases were treated at our institution. Multimodality therapy was performed in 58 patients: 43 patients received chemoradiotherapy, 13 underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, and two received chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Thirteen patients received single-modality therapy; chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery alone. The remaining nine patients received best supportive care alone. The metastatic organ was the liver (n= 40), the lungs (n= 33), bone (n= 10), and other (n= 6). Nine patients had metastasis in two organs. There was no difference in the median survival among the sites of organ metastasis, lung, liver, or bone (P= 0.8786). The survival of patients treated with multimodality therapy was significantly better than that of the patients who received single-modality therapy or best supportive care alone (P < 0.0001). In patients treated with multimodallity therapy, there was no difference in survival for patients treated with surgery compared with patients treated without surgery (P= 0.1291). This retrospective study involves an inevitable issue of patient selection bias. However, these results suggested that multimodality therapy could improve survival of the esophageal squamous cell cancer patients with distant organ metastasis.

Although a pCR was a relatively rare event, a high pCR rate would be helpful to select the regimen and courses of NAC, especially when the pathological response rates are similar.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte status is a strong predictor of good prognosis for ESCC patients.