The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Gland Tumors focus on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, and multiple endocrine neoplasia. NETs are generally subclassified by site of origin, stage, and histologic characteristics. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of NETs often involves collaboration between specialists in multiple disciplines, using specific biochemical, radiologic, and surgical methods. Specialists include pathologists, endocrinologists, radiologists (including nuclear medicine specialists), and medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists. These guidelines discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. This article is focused on the 2021 NCCN Guidelines principles of genetic risk assessment and counseling and recommendations for well-differentiated grade 3 NETs, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas.

Purpose To evaluate genotype-phenotype associations in individuals carrying germline variants of TMEM127, a poorly known gene that confers susceptibility to pheochromocytoma (PHEO) and paraganglioma (PGL) Design Data collected from a registry of probands with TMEM127 variants, published reports and public databases Main outcome analysis clinical, genetic and functional associations Results The cohort comprised 110 index patients (111 variants) with a mean age of 45 (range, 21-84 years). Females were predominant (76 vs. 34, P<0.001). Most patients had PHEO (n=94; 85.5%), although PGL (n=10; 9%) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC, n=6; 5.4%) were also detected, either alone or in combination with PHEO. One-third of the cases had multiple tumors and known family history was reported in 15.4%. Metastatic PHEO/PGL was rare (2.8%). Epinephrine alone, or combined with norepinephrine, accounted for 82% of the catecholamine profiles of PHEO/PGLs. Most variants (n=63) occurred only once and 13 were recurrent (2-12 times). Although non-truncating variants were less frequent than truncating changes overall, they were predominant in non-PHEO clinical presentations (36% PHEOs vs. 69% other, P<0.0001) and clustered disproportionately within transmembrane regions (P<0.01), underscoring the relevance of these domains for TMEM127 function. Integration of clinical and previous experimental data supported classification of variants into four groups based on mutation type, localization and predicted disruption. Conclusions Patients with TMEM127 variants often resemble sporadic nonmetastatic PHEOs. PGL and RCC may also co-occur, although their causal link requires further evaluation. We propose a new classification to predict variant pathogenicity and assist with carrier surveillance.

Patient: Male, 58Final Diagnosis: HypercalcemiaSymptoms: Confusion • dehydrationMedication: —Clinical Procedure: —Specialty: Endocrinology and MetabolismObjective:Rare co-existance of disease or pathologyBackground:Hypercalcemia associated with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is an ominous sign. Although rare, several cases have been reported and multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms have been independently proposed. We present a patient case and a literature review of the clinical presentation and mechanisms of CML-associated hypercalcemia.Case Report:A 58-year-old male with a past medical history of CML diagnosed six years earlier, presented to the emergency department with one week of acute confusion, disorientation, polyuria, and polydipsia. On physical examination, we observed tachycardia, altered mental status, and dehydration. Blood analysis revealed leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, and marked hypercalcemia (18.6 mg/dL). His chest CT scan showed diffuse lytic lesions and bone destruction concerning for diffuse bone marrow involvement. The patient was diagnosed with hypercalcemia in the context of a CML blast phase. Treatment with hydration, calcitonin, and zoledronic acid lead to control of his symptoms and normalization of his serum calcium levels. After discharged, the patient was maintained on palliative treatment and zoledronic acid management without new episodes of hypercalcemia. However, eight months later, the patient died.Conclusions:Evidence from the literature demonstrates a highly variable clinical presentation of CML-associated hypercalcemia, commonly occurring during an accelerated or a blast phase, and associated with poor survival. Multiple mechanisms could be involved and are not exclusive of each other. Better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in CML-associated hypercalcemia could lead to improvement in clinical and laboratory evaluation of these patients and be the foundation for the development of better management strategies and possibly target-directed therapy to positively improve prognosis.

Anaplastic thyroid cancer is a rare aggressive malignancy resulting in poor outcomes, including significant morbidity and mortality. Historically, the overall survival of patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer has been less than 12 months. Multidisciplinary approaches combining surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy have been implemented to control this ominous disease. The evolution in science and technology has promoted deeper knowledge in the genetic pathways and mechanisms driving advance thyroid cancer. Furthermore, understanding molecular pathways resulted in the application of antineoplastic agents used in other tumors to thyroid cancer and the development of new highly selective drugs. A major landmark in anaplastic thyroid cancer management history was recently reached with the approval of BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination, specifically dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAF-mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer; this treatment has improved survival and outcomes in this population. Similarly, newer kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy are further shifting advanced thyroid cancer management to consider as first-line therapy inhibiting actionable oncogenic alterations. Therefore, newer treatment paradigms are incorporating molecular testing to provide personalized cancer care in anaplastic thyroid cancer. In this review, the principal aim is to provide an overview of the available international data on tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy in the management of anaplastic thyroid cancer.

Background: Historical data suggests differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients (pts) with brain metastases (mets) have overall survival (OS) of approximately 1 year; other reports refer median OS of 33months. Little is known about the mutation profile these pts. The TCGA indicates a median of 1 mutation in pts with PTC, most of which were low risk cases. Methods: We retrospectively studied clinical characteristics including number of lesions, therapeutic modalities, OS and mutational profile of TC pts with brain mets at a single cancer center between 2013-2018. Cases were identified by ICD-9 & -10 codes for TC and secondary neoplasm of brain but excluded if a separate malignancy accounted for brain mets. Somatic mutations were tested by targeted next-generation sequencing in the majority of cases. Results: Of 105 cases reviewed, 52 met entry criteria. Median age at diagnosis of brain mets was 62.5 years (4-85years); 31/52 (59.6%) were males. DTC accounted for the majority of the pts, 37/52 (71%) [papillary thyroid cancer 55.8%(PTC; 29/52); poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC; 5/52) 9.6%; follicular thyroid cancer 5.8% (3/52); Hurthle cell 0/52]; anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) 21.1% (11/52) & medullary thyroid cancer 7.7% (4/52). Symptoms were present in 50%, predominantly weakness 9/26 (34.6%), headaches 6/26 (23.1%), altered mental status 5/26 (19.2%), visual changes 5/26 (19.2%) and seizures 4/26 (15.4%). 47 pts received systemic therapy as follows: antiangiogenic drug 26/47 (55%); BRAF inhibitor alone or in combination with MEK inhibitor 22/47 (46.8%) and checkpoint inhibitors 16/47 (34%). Molecular testing was available in 50 cases. Known oncogenic driver mutations were noted in 86%(43/50); BRAF V600E mutated in 25/50 (50%), RAS 14/50 (28%; NRAS n=11, HRAS n=2, KRAS n=1), RET mutated in 4 cases. Of 25 pts tested for TERT promoter mutation 8 (32%) were positive. Mean number +/- SD of somatic mutations was 2.14 +/- 1.15 in PTC; 2.6 +/-1.62 in PDTC; and 5.45 +/- 4.6 in ATC. In terms of number of brain lesions, 38.5% had ≥3 metastatic foci. Treatment consisted of radiation [stereotactic radiosurgery 22/50 (44%), whole brain radiation 10/50 (20%)] and 13/50 (26%) surgical intervention. Median OS was 29.7 months (95% CI 12.5-NR) after brain mets diagnosis. 1-year survival by number of brain metastases was 76% for single focus (n=17), 66% for 2 (n=15) and 50% (n=20) for ≥3 (p=0.034). One year OS for surgically treated vs radiation was not statistically different. 1-year OS for DTC was 65% (95% CI 51%, 82%) vs 53% in ATC (95% CI 30%, 94%) p-value=0.996. The OS in symptomatic vs silent brain mets was 19.9 months vs 29.6 months (p value= 0.45). Conclusions: Mutation burden appears to be higher in TC pts with brain mets compared to TCGA. In TC pts with brain mets, survival decreases as number of lesions increases. The OS was ...