Acetylcholine released from cholinergic nerves is involved in heat loss responses of cutaneous vasodilation and sweating. K(+) channels are thought to play a role in regulating cholinergic cutaneous vasodilation and sweating, though which K(+) channels are involved in their regulation remains unclear. We evaluated the hypotheses that 1) Ca(2+)-activated K(+) (KCa), ATP-sensitive K(+) (KATP), and voltage-gated K(+) (KV) channels all contribute to cholinergic cutaneous vasodilation; and 2) KV channels, but not KCa and KATP channels, contribute to cholinergic sweating. In 13 young adults (24 ± 5 years), cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) and sweat rate were evaluated at intradermal microdialysis sites that were continuously perfused with: 1) lactated Ringer (Control), 2) 50 mM tetraethylammonium (KCa channel blocker), 3) 5 mM glybenclamide (KATP channel blocker), and 4) 10 mM 4-aminopyridine (KV channel blocker). At all sites, cholinergic cutaneous vasodilation and sweating were induced by coadministration of methacholine (0.0125, 0.25, 5, 100, and 2,000 mM, each for 25 min). The methacholine-induced increase in CVC was lower with the KCa channel blocker relative to Control at 0.0125 (1 ± 1 vs. 9 ± 6%max) and 5 (2 ± 5 vs. 17 ± 14%max) mM methacholine, whereas it was lower in the presence of KATP (69 ± 7%max) and KV (57 ± 14%max) channel blocker compared with Control (79 ± 6%max) at 100 mM methacholine. Furthermore, methacholine-induced sweating was lower at the KV channel blocker site (0.42 ± 0.17 mg·min(-1)·cm(-2)) compared with Control (0.58 ± 0.15 mg·min(-1)·cm(-2)) at 2,000 mM methacholine. In conclusion, we show that KCa, KATP, and KV channels play a role in cholinergic cutaneous vasodilation, whereas only KV channels contribute to cholinergic sweating in normothermic resting humans.

No abstract

While the mechanisms underlying the control of cutaneous vasodilation have been extensively studied, there remains a lack of understanding of the different factors that may modulate cutaneous perfusion during an exercise-induced heat stress. We evaluated the hypothesis that heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) contributes to the heat loss response of cutaneous vasodilation via the activation of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) during exercise in the heat. In 11 young males (25 ± 5 yr), cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was measured at four forearm skin sites that were continuously treated with ) lactated Ringer solution (control),) NOS inhibition with 10 mM -nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME),) HSP90 inhibition with 178 μM geldanamycin, or ) a combination of 10 mM l-NAME and 178 μM geldanamycin. Participants rested in a moderate heat stress (35°C) condition for 70 min. Thereafter, they performed a 50-min bout of moderate-intensity cycling (~52% V̇o) followed by a 30-min recovery period. We showed that NOS inhibition attenuated CVC (~40-50%) relative to the control site during pre- and postexercise rest in the heat ( ≤ 0.05); however, no effect of HSP90 inhibition was observed ( > 0.05). During exercise, we observed an attenuation of CVC with the separate inhibition of NOS (~40-50%) and HSP90 (~15-20%) compared with control (both ≤ 0.05). However, the effect of HSP90 inhibition was absent in the presence of the coinhibition of NOS ( > 0.05). We show that HSP90 contributes to cutaneous vasodilation in young men exposed to the heat albeit during exercise only. We also show that the HSP90 contribution is due to NOS-dependent mechanisms. We show that heat shock protein 90 functionally contributes to the heat loss response of cutaneous vasodilation during exercise in the heat, and this response is mediated through the activation of nitric oxide synthase. Therefore, interventions that may activate heat shock protein 90 may facilitate an increase in heat dissipation through an augmentation of cutaneous perfusion. In turn, this may attenuate or reduce the increase in core temperature and therefore the level of heat strain.

No abstract

Edited by: Philip Atherton New Findings r What is the central question of this study?Acetylcholine released from cholinergic nerves can activate both muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. Although each receptor can independently induce cutaneous vasodilatation and eccrine sweating, it remains to be elucidated whether the two receptors interact in order to mediate these responses. r What is the main finding and its importance?We show that although nicotinic receptor activation does not modulate muscarinic cutaneous vasodilatation, it lowers the muscarinic receptor agonist threshold at which onset for eccrine sweating (augmentation of muscarinic eccrine sweating) occurs in young men in normothermic resting conditions. These results provide new insights into the physiological significance of nicotinic receptors in the regulation of cutaneous perfusion and eccrine sweating.Acetylcholine released from cholinergic nerves can activate both muscarinic and nicotinic receptors; each is known independently to induce cutaneous vasodilatation and eccrine sweating in humans. However, it is not known whether the two receptors interact in order to mediate cutaneous vasodilatation and eccrine sweating. In 10 young men (27 ± 6 years old), cutaneous vascular conductance and sweat rate were evaluated at intradermal microdialysis sites that were continuously perfused with either lactated Ringer's solution (control) or three different concentrations of nicotine (0.1, 1 and 10 mm), a nicotinic receptor agonist. Co-administration of methacholine, a muscarinic receptor agonist, was performed at all skin sites in a dose-proportional fashion (0.0125, 0.25, 5, 100 and 2000 mm, each for 25 min). Administration of nicotine alone caused dose-dependent transient increases in cutaneous vascular conductance and sweat rate (all P ࣘ 0.05), which thereafter returned to pre-nicotine levels, except that a portion of transient responses remained with continuous administration of 10 mm nicotine (both P ࣘ 0.05). Cutaneous vascular conductance was increased by administration of ࣙ0.25 mm methacholine at the control site, and this response was likewise observed in the presence of co-administration of all doses of nicotine used (all P ࣘ 0.05). Sweat rate at the control site was increased by administration of ࣙ0.25 mm methacholine, but the lowest dose of methacholine (0.0125 mm) was able to increase sweat rate in the presence of 10 mm nicotine (P ࣘ 0.05). We conclude that nicotinic receptor activation lowers the muscarinic