Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID‐19 is associated with high mortality. Mesenchymal stem cells are known to exert immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory effects and could yield beneficial effects in COVID‐19 ARDS. The objective of this study was to determine safety and explore efficacy of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (UC‐MSC) infusions in subjects with COVID‐19 ARDS. A double‐blind, phase 1/2a, randomized, controlled trial was performed. Randomization and stratification by ARDS severity was used to foster balance among groups. All subjects were analyzed under intention to treat design. Twenty‐four subjects were randomized 1:1 to either UC‐MSC treatment (n = 12) or the control group (n = 12). Subjects in the UC‐MSC treatment group received two intravenous infusions (at day 0 and 3) of 100 ± 20 × 106 UC‐MSCs; controls received two infusions of vehicle solution. Both groups received best standard of care. Primary endpoint was safety (adverse events [AEs]) within 6 hours; cardiac arrest or death within 24 hours postinfusion). Secondary endpoints included patient survival at 31 days after the first infusion and time to recovery. No difference was observed between groups in infusion‐associated AEs. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed related to UC‐MSC infusions. UC‐MSC infusions in COVID‐19 ARDS were found to be safe. Inflammatory cytokines were significantly decreased in UC‐MSC‐treated subjects at day 6. Treatment was associated with significantly improved patient survival (91% vs 42%, P = .015), SAE‐free survival (P = .008), and time to recovery (P = .03). UC‐MSC infusions are safe and could be beneficial in treating subjects with COVID‐19 ARDS.
BackgroundUterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive subtype of endometrial carcinoma which has been increasing at alarming rates, particularly among Asian, Hispanic and Black women. USC has not been well characterized in terms of mutational status, pattern of metastases and survival.ObjectiveTo investigate the association between sites of recurrence and metastases of USC, mutational status, race, and overall survival (OS).MethodsThis single-center retrospective study evaluated patients with biopsy-proven USC that underwent genomic testing between January 2015 and July 2021. Association between genomic profile and sites of metastases or recurrence was performed using χ2 or Fisher’s exact test. Survival curves for ethnicity and race, mutations, sites of metastasis/recurrence were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine the association between OS with age, race, ethnicity, mutational status, and sites of metastasis/recurrence. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS Software Version 9.4.ResultsThe study included 67 women (mean age 65.8 years, range 44-82) with 52 non-Hispanic women (78%) and 33 Black women (49%). The most common mutation was TP53 (55/58 women, 95%). The peritoneum was the most common site of metastasis (29/33, 88%) and recurrence (8/27, 30%). PR expression was more common in women with nodal metastases (p=0.02) and non-Hispanic women (p=0.01). ERBB2 alterations were more common in women with vaginal cuff recurrence (p=0.02), while PIK3CA mutation was more common in women with liver metastases (p=0.048). ARID1A mutation and presence of recurrence or metastases to the liver were associated with lower OS (Hazard Ratio (HR): 31.87; 95%CI: 3.21, 316.9; p<0.001 and HR: 5.66; 95%CI: 1.2, 26.79; p=0.01, respectively). In the bivariable Cox model, the presence of metastasis/recurrence to the liver and/or the peritoneum were both independent significant predictors of OS (HR: 9.8; 95%CI: 1.85-52.7; p=0.007 and HR: 2.7; 95%CI: 1.02-7.1; p=0.04, respectively).ConclusionsTP53 is often mutated in USC, which most commonly metastasize and recur in the peritoneum. OS was shorter in women with ARID1A mutations and with metastasis/recurrence to the liver. The presence of metastasis/recurrence to liver and/or peritoneum were independently associated with shorter OS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.