The purpose of this study was to examine the interrater and test-retest reliability of a one-leg balance test and a tiltboard balance test. Twenty-four normally developing children aged 4 through 9 years participated in the study. Time and quality of balance on one leg and degrees of tilt on a tiltboard prior to postural adjustment were measured. Both tests were completed with eyes open and with eyes closed. Interrater reliability was examined using two raters. Test-retest reliability, with a one-week interval between test and retest, was examined for a subgroup consisting of 12 children. Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients were used as indexes of both interrater and test-retest reliability for time and degrees of tilt. To supplement the correlation coefficients, the magnitudes of difference between raters' scores and between test and retest scores were calculated. Spearman coefficients were moderate to high for one-leg balance when scores for both feet were combined for both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. The magnitude of difference between scores was low, indicating good agreement between raters and across time. Interrater and test-retest reliabilities of quality of one-leg standing balance were examined by calculating percentages of agreement and Cohen's Kappa statistics. Results of these analyses revealed the need for further study. The Spearman coefficients for the interrater tiltboard test were high; however, the test-retest coefficients were low. The magnitudes of difference between scores were small for the two raters, but large for test and retest. These results are important to consider when using these tests for initial evaluation or for monitoring patient progress.
Acute adaptations to use have been shown to occur in both the muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ pathways. This short term activation adaptation increases the excitability of the motoneuron pool, thereby potentially providing a nonvoluntary increase in the excitation of subsequent contractions. It is thought that the intrafusal muscle fibres reset to a higher gain after contraction and that the tendon organ pathway undergoes a brief desensitisation. These phenomena could be important clinically when trying to stretch muscles, i.e. a contraction before a stretch should make the stretch more difficult. Also, this could affect the amount of muscle force generated, thereby altering motor behaviours requiring fine accuracy. Research on the adaptations of proprioceptors during free movement, using locomotion as a model, has found that the hypothesis of consistent alpha-gamma coactivation during motor behaviours is much more complicated and adaptable, depending on the environmental circumstance and the specific motor task. These research findings support the use of selective training, i.e. training to the task, for optimal motor learning. The results of the relatively limited research on chronic adaptations of proprioceptors due to exercise has shown that on a microlevel, the intrafusal muscle fibres may show some metabolic changes but do not show any hypertrophy. However, on a more macro level, with extended training, the latency of the stretch reflex response is found to be decreased and the amplitude is found to be increased in both animals and humans. Through classical conditioning research, proprioceptors may also be necessary for motor learning. Lastly, both primates and humans have been shown to be able to up- or down-grade their stretch reflex responses using operant conditioning techniques and many practice sessions. These findings have important implications both for rehabilitation of persons with abnormal reflex activity and in the training of athletes. This review provides some consolidation of the recent research findings, but much more research needs to be done in order to fully understand the purpose and importance of the proprioceptive sensory system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.