Aim: Minimally invasive colorectal surgery reduces surgical trauma with better preservation of abdominal wall integrity, but the extraction site is still at risk of incisional hernia (IH). The aim of this study was to determine pooled incidence of IH for each type of extraction site and to compare rates of IH after midline, nonmidline and Pfannenstiel extraction.Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Single-armed and multiple-armed cohort studies and randomized controlled trials regarding minimally invasive colorectal surgery were searched from five databases.Outcomes were pooled and compared with random-effects, inverse-variance models. Risk of bias within the studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tool. Results: Thirty six studies were included, with a total 11,788 patients. The pooled extraction site IH rate was 16.0% for midline (n = 4081), 9.3% for umbilical (n = 2425), 5.2% for transverse (n = 3213), 9.4% for paramedian (n = 134) and 2.1% for Pfannenstiel (n = 1449). Nonmidline extraction (transverse and paramedian) showed significantly lower odds ratios (ORs) for IH when compared with midline extraction (including umbilical). Pfannenstiel extraction resulted in a significantly lower OR for IH compared with midline [OR 0.12 (0.50-0.30)], transverse [OR 0.25 (0.13-0.50)] and umbilical (OR 0.072 [0.033-0.16]) extraction sites. The risks of surgical site infection, seroma/haematoma or wound dehiscence were not significantly different in any of the analyses. Conclusion: Pfannenstiel extraction is the preferred method in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. In cases where Pfannenstiel extraction is not possible, surgeons should avoid specimen extraction in the midline.
Aim Minimally invasive colorectal surgery reduces surgical trauma with better preservation of abdominal wall integrity, but the extraction site is still at risk of incisional hernia (IH). This study aimed to determine pooled incidence of IH for each type of extraction site, and to compare IH rates after midline, non-midline and Pfannenstiel extraction. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Single-armed and multiple-armed cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials regarding minimally invasive colorectal surgery were queried from five databases. Outcomes were pooled and compared with random-effects, inverse-variance models. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools. Results Thirty-six studies were included, totalling 11,788 patients. Pooled extraction site incisional hernia (ESIH) rate was 16.0% for midline (n=4081), 9.3% for umbilical (n=2425), 5.2% for transverse (n=3213), 9.4% for paramedian (n=134) and 2.1% for Pfannenstiel (n=1449). ESIH occurred significantly more with midline extraction in comparison to Pfannenstiel (Odds Ratio (OR) 8.4 [3.5;20.0]). Non-midline extraction (transverse and paramedian) showed a significantly lower OR for IH compared to midline extraction (midline and umbilical). Pfannenstiel extraction resulted in significantly lower OR for ESIH compared to midline (OR 0.12 [0.050;0.30]), transverse (OR 0.25 [0.13;0.50]) and umbilical (OR 0.072 [0.033;0.16]) extraction sites. The risks of surgical site infection and surgical site occurrence were not significantly different in any analyses. Conclusions Specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision is the preferred method in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. In cases where Pfannenstiel extraction is not possible, surgeons should avoid midline specimen extraction.
Aim Inguinal hernia (IH) belongs to the most common surgical pathology worldwide. Approximately, one third of patients are asymptomatic. Watchful waiting (WW) has been regarded as a justifiable treatment option, but doubts still exist since high crossover (CO) rates to surgery may occur. The aim of this study is to assess the CO rates after 13-year follow-up of our randomized controlled trial (RCT). Material and Methods In our original study, 496 men with an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic IH were randomly assigned to elective repair or WW. A retrospective review was conducted of patients initially assigned to WW. Primary outcome was CO rate to surgery. Secondary outcomes included reason for crossing over and time between initial randomisation and the CO to surgery. Results In the original RCT, 95 of 262 WW patients electively crossed over to surgery (35.4%) after 32.9 months. Currently, 212 of the 262 (81.0%) WW patients were reviewed, and 133/212 (62.7%) crossed over to surgery. Median follow-up was 13 years (range, 8-15 years). Mean time to CO was 35.2 months SD (40.8). Motivations for crossing over to surgery were predominantly due to progression of symptoms (83.5%), and in 8 (3.8%) cases due to an emergency event. Conclusions In the presented population, WW on the long-term remains a safe strategy, saving one third of patients an operation, although CO to surgery will likely occur. Insights into the natural course of untreated inguinal hernia that are valuable during patient counseling can be offered in the form of long-term CO rate due to progression of symptoms.
Aim The incidence of a parastomal hernia (PSH) is approximately 40% two years after stoma construction and can even increase to 50% after a longer period. The European Hernia Society (EHS) published a guideline showing that the evidence for treatment of a PSH is of low quality. Due to the lack of evidence, a survey was conducted to provide insight into the Dutch approach. Material and Methods A survey was sent to 104 surgeons in the Netherlands representing their surgical department. The survey was developed by three hernia surgeons and a physiotherapist specialized in abdominal wall pathology. Results The survey was completed by 103 surgeons (99%) from 75 hospitals. 75% of the respondents perform a laparoscopic Sugarbaker for the treatment of PSH after colostomy, ileostomy or Bricker deviation. Most respondents (75%) replied that they never use a prophylactic mesh to prevent for the occurrence of PSH, although more than half of them do wish to introduce this. Conclusions Authors believe that the implementation of minimally invasive surgery and the systematic review performed by Hansson et al. in 2012, shifted the treatment strategy for PSH towards the use of a laparoscopic Sugarbaker. Nevertheless, little is known about the results of this treatment. Although there is a high level of evidence for the use of prophylactic mesh placement in reducing the incidence of PSH development, this has not been implemented in daily practice for colorectal and/or hernia surgeons. Authors aim for registration of PSH repair to evaluate the outcomes in terms of recurrence, pain and quality of life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.