: I.

ObjectiveTwo low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive systems (LNG-IUSs; total content 13.5 mg [average approx. 8 μg/24 hours over the first year; LNG-IUS 8] and total content 19.5 mg [average approx. 13 μg/24 hours over the first year; LNG-IUS 13]) have previously been shown to be highly effective (3-year Pearl Indices: 0.33 and 0.31, respectively), safe and well tolerated. The present subgroup analyses evaluated whether or not outcomes were affected by parity, age (18–25 vs 26–35 years), or body mass index (BMI, <30 vs ≥30 kg/m2).MethodsNulliparous and parous women aged 18‒35 years with regular menstrual cycles (21‒35 days) requesting contraception were randomized to 3 years of LNG-IUS 8 or LNG-IUS 13 use.ResultsIn the LNG-IUS 8 and LNG-IUS 13 groups, 1432 and 1452 women, respectively, had a placement attempted and were included in the full analysis set; 39.2%, 39.2% and 17.1% were 18–25 years old, nulliparous and had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, respectively. Both systems were similarly effective regardless of age, parity or BMI; the subgroup Pearl Indices had widely overlapping 95% confidence intervals. Placement of LNG-IUS 8 and LNG-IUS 13 was easier (p < 0.0001) and less painful (p < 0.0001) in women who had delivered vaginally than in women who had not. The complete/partial expulsion rate was 2.2–4.2% across all age and parity subgroups and higher in parous than in nulliparous women (p = 0.004). The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease was 0.1–0.6% across all age and parity subgroups: nulliparous and younger women were not at higher risk than parous and older women, respectively. The ectopic pregnancy rate was 0.3–0.4% across all age and parity subgroups. Across all age and parity subgroups, the 3-year completion rate was 50.9–61.3% for LNG-IUS 8 and 57.9–61.1% for LNG-IUS 13, and was higher (p = 0.0001) among older than younger women in the LNG-IUS 8 group only.ConclusionsLNG-IUS 8 and LNG-IUS 13 were highly effective, safe and well tolerated regardless of age or parity.Trial RegistrationClinical trials.gov NCT00528112

No abstract

NCT01397097.

LNG-IUS 8 and EE/DRSP were associated with similarly high user satisfaction rates. However, LNG-IUS 8 users were significantly more likely to prefer to continue their contraceptive method post-study, indicating that a levonorgestrel intrauterine system is an appealing contraceptive option for young women.

Objective: This retrospective observational study described baseline characteristics, real-world treatment patterns, and outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with abemaciclib in the United States. Methods: De-identified electronic health record-derived data were used to describe patients who began abemaciclib treatment on or after 30 June 2016 and !4 months before data cutoff (31 December 2018). Real-world response (rwR) and real-world progression assessments were abstracted from clinical documentation. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the real-world best response. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated real-world time to first response (rwTTFR) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). Results: The median age of 118 female patients at abemaciclib initiation was 66.5 years (interquartile range, 57.0, 73.0). The breakdown of patients who received abemaciclib in first, second, third, or later lines was 28.8%, 21.2%, 20.3%, and 29.7%, respectively. Patients received abemaciclib as monotherapy (12.7%) or in combination with endocrine therapy: fulvestrant (59.3%); aromatase inhibitor (22.9%); aromatase inhibitor and fulvestrant (5.1%). There were 68 patients (57.6%) with !1 rwR assessment: 41.2% with a real-world complete response or real-world partial response. Median rwTTFR was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval, 3.5, 5.2). Twelve-month rwPFS probability was 61.7%. Conclusions: This study represents utilization and outcomes associated with abemaciclib approximately 1 year following FDA approval. Treatment patterns demonstrated heterogeneity and, as in clinical trials, patients appeared to benefit from abemaciclib treatment in the real world. More research investigating outcomes associated with abemaciclib treatment is needed, with larger samples and longer follow-up to enable closer evaluation by subgroup, regimen, and line of therapy.

Background: Abemaciclib is a selective continually dosed cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4&6) inhibitor approved as a single agent and in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of HR+,HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). To date, few publications have reported the real world (rw) use of abemaciclib. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes among MBC patients treated with abemaciclib in the US. Methods: HR+,HER2- MBC patients who initiated treatment with abemaciclib on or after 6/30/2016 and at least 4 months prior to the data cutoff date (12/31/2018) were selected from the de-identified Flatiron Health electronic-health record-derived database for US patients. The data were predominantly from a community oncology setting. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded at the start of abemaciclib therapy. Using technology-enabled abstraction, rw tumor response (rwTR) assessments on abemaciclib were collected to calculate rw best response (rwBR) which was defined as rw complete (rwCR) or partial response (rwPR). Time to first response (rwTTFR) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline characteristics and treatment patterns. Results: 118 female MBC patients were treated with abemaciclib. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Median age at abemaciclib initiation was 66.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57-73). 28.8% of patients received abemaciclib in first line (1L), 21.2% in second line (2L), 20.3% in third line (3L), and 29.7% in later lines (4+L). 12.7% of patients (n=15) received abemaciclib as a monotherapy, occurring mostly in later lines. Patients also received abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy, including fulvestrant (59.3%), or aromatase inhibitor (22.9%), or other treatment (5.1%). 24.6% of patients received prior treatment with a different CDK 4&6 inhibitor. Most patients (81.3%) had a starting dose of 150 mg of abemaciclib, while other starting doses included 200 mg (8.4%), 100 mg (4.2%), 50 mg (3.4%), or unknown dose (2.5%). During treatment, 6.8%, and 21.2% of patients had a dose reduction or schedule change, respectively. Of the patients with a schedule change (n=25), 72% changed from twice to once daily. Among all abemaciclib patients who had at least 1 rwTR assessment (n=68), 41.2% had a rwBR. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward higher rates of rwBR in 1L (65.0%) compared to 2L (37.4%), 3L (35.7%), and 4+L (22.3%). Median rwTTFR was 3.6 months (95% CI: 3.5-5.2). Conclusions: This is one of the first studies describing rw utilization of abemaciclib, and it provides initial insights into scheduling and dosing in an rw population. There is evidence of response to abemaciclib even in later lines. Future research will be needed as treatment patterns evolve and longer follow-up periods are available to further describe patient outcomes. Table 1: Baseline patient characteristicsAbemaciclibN = 118%Race:White63.6Non-white20.3Unknown/missing16.1Stage at initial diagnosis:I11.9II16.1III28.8IV34.7Not documented8.5Tumor grade at initial diagnosis:Grade 19.3Grade 245.8Grade 322.9Unknown/not documented22.0Time between initial and metastatic diagnosis dates among patients who were not metastatic at initial diagnosisa:&lt; 2 years20.8≥ 2 years79.2Menopausal statusb:Post-menopausal93.2Pre-menopausal6.8Modified Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) statusc:0/Unknown72.0116.928.53+2.5Number of sites of metastases, median [IQR]d2.0 [1.0:3.0]Presence of lung metastases34.7Presence of liver metastases22.9Presence of brain metastases7.6Follow-up time (months), median [IQR]6.4 [4.1:9.5]a: Patients not metastatic at initial diagnosis (n=77)b: Derived using age and evidence of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonistc: Excludes cancer diagnosisd: Interquartile Range (IQR) Citation Format: Gebra Cuyun Carter, Kristin M Sheffield, Anala Gossai, Yu-Jing Huang, Yajun Emily Zhu, Lee Bowman, Emily Nash Smith, Raina Mathur, Aaron B Cohen, Shrujal Baxi, Sarah Rybowski, Amy Lee Chong, Andrew D Seidman. Initial real world treatment patterns and outcomes of Abemaciclib for the treatment of HR+,HER2- metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-12.

No abstract