The range of effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life among women with breast cancer remains uncertain. Furthermore, it is unclear which components of multimodal interventions account for such effects. To address these issues, the authors tested a 10-week group cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention among 199 women newly treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer, following them for 1 year after recruitment. The intervention reduced reports of social disruption and increased emotional well-being, positive states of mind, benefit finding, positive lifestyle change, and positive affect for up to 12 months (indeed, some effects strengthened over time). With respect to mechanisms tested, the intervention increased confidence in being able to relax at will. There was also evidence that effects of the intervention on the various outcomes examined were mediated by change in confidence about being able to relax.Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michael H. Antoni, Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Coral Gables, FL 33146. mantoni@miami.edu. HHS Public AccessAuthor manuscript J Consult Clin Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 January 03. Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author ManuscriptThus, this intervention had beneficial effects on diverse aspects of quality of life after treatment for breast cancer, which appear linked to a specific stress management skill taught in the intervention.Keywords breast cancer; stress management; relaxation training; quality of life Treatment of breast cancer requires significant psychosocial adaptation (Irvine, Brown, Crooks, Roberts, & Browne, 1991; van't Spijker, Trijsburg, Duivenvoorden, 1997). Symptoms of depression and anxiety are common, along with reports of subjective stress and decrements in sexual and interpersonal functioning (Andrykowski, Cordova, Studts, & Miller, 1998;Carver, Lehman, & Antoni, 2003;Schag et al., 1993; Wimberly, Carver, Laurenceau, Harris, & Antoni, 2005). Conversely, the experience of breast cancer is not wholly negative; many women perceive benefits (as well as threats) in the experience (Taylor, 1983). These include improved personal resources and skills, an enhanced sense of purpose, enhanced spirituality, closer ties to others, and changes in life priorities, collectively termed benefit finding (Lechner & Antoni, 2004; Tomich & Helgeson, 2004).Many factors have been identified as sources of resiliency among women with breast cancer -variables that buffer negative experiences or foster positive ones (Carver, 2005a). Such factors as optimism, effective coping strategies, and social support from one's spouse or family members yield fewer negative and more positive experiences during treatment and beyond (Alferi, Carver, Antoni, Weiss, & Duran, 2001;Carver et al., 1993;Stanton, Kirk, Cameron, & Danoff-Burg, 2000;Carver et al., 2005). Such work provides a blueprint for psychosocial interventions to enhance resiliency fac...
Objective-After surgery for breast cancer, many women experience anxiety relating to the cancer that can adversely affect quality of life and emotional functioning during the year postsurgery. Symptoms such as intrusive thoughts may be ameliorated during this period with a structured, group-based cognitive behavior intervention.Method-A 10-week group cognitive behavior stress management intervention that included anxiety reduction (relaxation training), cognitive restructuring, and coping skills training was tested among 199 women newly treated for stage 0-III breast cancer. They were then followed for 1 year after recruitment.Results-The intervention reduced reports of thought intrusion, interviewer ratings of anxiety, and emotional distress across 1 year significantly more than was seen with the control condition. The beneficial effects were maintained well past the completion of adjuvant therapy.Conclusions-Structured, group-based cognitive behavior stress management may ameliorate cancer-related anxiety during active medical treatment for breast cancer and for 1 year following treatment. Group-based cognitive behavior stress management is a clinically useful adjunct to offer to women treated for breast cancer.Approximately 216,000 new cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in the United States in 2004 (1). Diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are clearly stressful events (2) involving invasive medical procedures with aversive side effects of treatment such as pain, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue (3). Recurring thoughts about the diagnosis and treatment are common (4). Although diagnostic levels of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are relatively rare (5), PTSD-like symptoms and subthreshold levels of PTSD are more frequent (6, 7). After Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Antoni, Department of Psychology, 5665 Ponce DeLeon Blvd., University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124-0751; MAntoni@miami.edu. Dr. Antoni reports that he is the author of a book that details the intervention discussed in the article which is published by the American Psychological Association. The other authors report no competing interests. HHS Public Access Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript treatment, many survivors experience residual psychological strain from the diagnosis, shifts in social support, fear of recurrence, and fear of death (8).Factors that influence distress after breast cancer treatment include coping style and social support (6,9,10). Prospective studies reveal that optimism (11), coping strategies such as positive reframing and acceptance (11,12), and social support (13) yield less distress in the months after treatment. Similarly, psychosocial interventions that foster optimistic appraisals, build coping strategies, and bolster social support should benefit women treated for breast cancer (14).Psychosocial interventions for persons with cancer and other chronic illnesses typically use cognitive behavior techniques, often incorporating skills training an...
The range of effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life among women with breast cancer remains uncertain. Furthermore, it is unclear which components of multimodal interventions account for such effects. To address these issues, the authors tested a 10-week group cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention among 199 women newly treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer, following them for 1 year after recruitment. The intervention reduced reports of social disruption and increased emotional well-being, positive states of mind, benefit finding, positive lifestyle change, and positive affect for up to 12 months (indeed, some effects strengthened over time). With respect to mechanisms tested, the intervention increased confidence in being able to relax at will. There was also evidence that effects of the intervention on the various outcomes examined were mediated by change in confidence about being able to relax.Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michael H. Antoni, Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Coral Gables, FL 33146. mantoni@miami.edu. HHS Public AccessAuthor manuscript J Consult Clin Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 January 03. Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author ManuscriptThus, this intervention had beneficial effects on diverse aspects of quality of life after treatment for breast cancer, which appear linked to a specific stress management skill taught in the intervention.Keywords breast cancer; stress management; relaxation training; quality of life Treatment of breast cancer requires significant psychosocial adaptation (Irvine, Brown, Crooks, Roberts, & Browne, 1991; van't Spijker, Trijsburg, Duivenvoorden, 1997). Symptoms of depression and anxiety are common, along with reports of subjective stress and decrements in sexual and interpersonal functioning (Andrykowski, Cordova, Studts, & Miller, 1998;Carver, Lehman, & Antoni, 2003;Schag et al., 1993; Wimberly, Carver, Laurenceau, Harris, & Antoni, 2005). Conversely, the experience of breast cancer is not wholly negative; many women perceive benefits (as well as threats) in the experience (Taylor, 1983). These include improved personal resources and skills, an enhanced sense of purpose, enhanced spirituality, closer ties to others, and changes in life priorities, collectively termed benefit finding (Lechner & Antoni, 2004; Tomich & Helgeson, 2004).Many factors have been identified as sources of resiliency among women with breast cancer -variables that buffer negative experiences or foster positive ones (Carver, 2005a). Such factors as optimism, effective coping strategies, and social support from one's spouse or family members yield fewer negative and more positive experiences during treatment and beyond (Alferi, Carver, Antoni, Weiss, & Duran, 2001;Carver et al., 1993;Stanton, Kirk, Cameron, & Danoff-Burg, 2000;Carver et al., 2005). Such work provides a blueprint for psychosocial interventions to enhance resiliency fac...
Two studies examined breast cancer patients' perceptions of their partners' reactions to their diagnosis and treatment as influences on 3 aspects of patients' well-being: psychosexual adjustment, emotional distress, and marital satisfaction. Study 1, cross-sectional, indicated that partner initiation of sex, frequency of sex, a positive 1st sexual experience after treatment, and especially perception of the partner's emotional involvement in the relationship, were relevant to these outcomes. Study 2, longitudinal, confirmed many of these findings in prospective tests across 1 year of recovery after surgery. Partner involvement prospectively predicted all 3 outcomes. Partner initiation of sex predicted greater marital satisfaction; partner adverse reaction to the scar predicted less marital satisfaction. Rated quality of the 1st sexual experience after treatment predicted less distress. The pattern suggests that women's impressions of their partners' emotional involvement after surgery for breast cancer forecast their adjustment in sexual, marital, and emotional arenas over the following year.Women who are diagnosed with and treated for breast cancer face challenges on many levels. Most women with early-stage breast cancer (who thus have a good prognosis) do not experience severe long-term psychological problems, but almost all experience some difficulties in adjustment, particularly early in the experience (Bloom et al
Relatively little is known about how members of minority groups cope with experiences such as diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer -in particular, whether coping patterns among minorities differ from that of the majority. This study adds to the existing knowledge base using a cross-sectional sample of middle-class African-American (n ¼ 26), Hispanic (n ¼ 59), and non-Hispanic White women (n ¼ 151) who had been treated for early stage breast cancer in the past year. We tested for differences in coping responses per se and also for the possibility that coping would relate to distress differently in different groups. There were only two differences in coping (controlling for medical variables, education, and distress): compared to non-Hispanic White women, the other two groups both reported using humor-based coping less, and religion-based coping more. There was one difference in how coping related to distress: venting related more strongly to elevated distress among Hispanic than among non-Hispanics. Discussion centers on a growing consensus on ethnic differences in religious and humor-based coping, and on the relative absence of other coping differences among these populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.