Mouse is the predominant experimental model for the study of human disease due, in part, to phylogenetic relationship, ease of breeding, and the availability of molecular tools for genetic manipulation. Advances in genome-editing methodologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9, enable the rapid production of new transgenic mouse strains, necessitating complementary high-throughput and systematic phenotyping technologies. In contrast to traditional protein phenotyping techniques, multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry can be highly multiplexed without forgoing specificity or quantitative precision. Here we present MRM assays for the quantitation of 500 proteins and subsequently determine reference concentration values for plasma proteins across five laboratory mouse strains that are typically used in biomedical research, revealing inter-strain and intra-strain phenotypic differences. These 500 MRM assays will have a broad range of research applications including high-throughput phenotypic validation of novel transgenic mice, identification of candidate biomarkers, and general research applications requiring multiplexed and precise protein quantification.
When quantifying endogenous plasma proteins for fundamental and biomedical research - as well as for clinical applications - precise, reproducible, and robust assays are required. Targeted detection of peptides in a bottom-up strategy is the most common and precise mass spectrometry-based quantitation approach when combined with the use of stable isotope-labeled peptides. However, when measuring protein in plasma, the unknown endogenous levels prevent the implementation of the best calibration strategies, since no blank matrix is available. Consequently, several alternative calibration strategies are employed by different laboratories. In this study, these methods were compared to a new approach using two different stable isotope-labeled standard (SIS) peptide isotopologues for each endogenous peptide to be quantified, enabling an external calibration curve as well as the quality control samples to be prepared in pooled human plasma without interference from endogenous peptides. This strategy improves the analytical performance of the assay and enables the accuracy of the assay to be monitored, which can also facilitate method development and validation.
The mouse is the most commonly used laboratory animal, with more than 14 million mice being used for research each year in North America alone. The number and diversity of mouse models is increasing rapidly through genetic engineering strategies, but detailed characterization of these models is still challenging because most phenotypic information is derived from time-consuming histological and biochemical analyses. To expand the biochemists' toolkit, we generated a set of targeted proteomic assays for mouse plasma and heart tissue, utilizing bottom-up LC/MRM-MS with isotope-labeled peptides as internal standards. Protein quantitation was performed using reverse standard curves, with LC-MS platform and curve performance evaluated by quality control standards. The assays comprising the final panel (101 peptides for 81 proteins in plasma; 227 peptides for 159 proteins in heart tissue) have been rigorously developed under a fit-for-purpose approach and utilize stable-isotope labeled peptides for every analyte to provide high-quality, precise relative quantitation. In addition, the peptides have been tested to be interference-free and the assay is highly multiplexed, with reproducibly determined protein concentrations spanning >4 orders of magnitude. The developed assays have been used in a small pilot study to demonstrate their application to molecular phenotyping or biomarker discovery/verification studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.