BackgroundThe evolution of smoking rates according to migrant status has not been examined in France, despite a recent reduction in overall smoking rates.MethodsDePICT is a two waves (2016: n=4356; 2017: n=4114) nationwide telephone survey, representative of the French adult population We compared smoking-related behaviors before and after implementation of tobacco-control measures (2017), according to the geographical region of birth. ResultsCompared to 2016, individuals originating from Africa or the Middle East had a slightly higher smoking prevalence in 2017 (34.7% vs 31.3%), despite a higher intention to quit or attempt in the preceding year (adjusted OR(ORa)= 2.72[1.90; 3.90]) compared to non-immigrants. They were also less likely to experience an unsuccessful quit attempt (ORa= 1.76[1.18; 2.62])ConclusionTobacco-control measures could have widened smoking inequalities related to migrant status. The evolution of smoking-related behaviors among immigrants should be examined when studying the long-term effects of such policies.
Background The evolution of smoking rates according to migrant status has not been examined in France, despite a recent reduction in overall smoking rates. Methods DePICT is a two waves (2016: n = 4356; 2017: n = 4114) nationwide telephone survey, representative of the French adult population. We compared smoking-related behaviors before and after implementation of tobacco-control measures (2017), according to the geographical region of birth. Results Compared to 2016, individuals originating from Africa or the Middle East had a slightly higher smoking prevalence in 2017 (34.7% vs 31.3%), despite a higher intention to quit or attempt in the preceding year (adjusted OR(ORa) = 2.72[1.90; 3.90]) compared to non-immigrants. They were also less likely to experience an unsuccessful quit attempt (ORa = 1.76[1.18; 2.62]). Conclusion Tobacco-control measures could have widened smoking inequalities related to migrant status. The evolution of smoking-related behaviors among immigrants should be examined when studying the long-term effects of such policies.
Background: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) has serious consequences on the mental health of victims-survivors such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). « La Maison des Femmes » (MdF, Women’s Home) is a French original medical and social structure specifically dedicated to provide multidisciplinary care for victims-survivors of IPV. The main objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of PTSD in victims-survivors of IPV consulting at the MdF or in two Municipal Health Centers (MHCs) located in the same area of the Paris conurbation. Methods: We conducted an observational survey from July 2020 to June 2021 in the MdF and in two MHCs. All women aged 18 years and over having suffered from IPV were eligible. PTSD diagnosis was assessed using the PTSD self-report checklist of symptoms defined in the DSM-5 (PCL-5). We solicited data on the level of self-rated global health, the substances use, and the possibility of reaching women by phone in the 6 months following the inclusion visit. We also conducted qualitative interviews with a sub-sample of the women, asking for victims-survivors’ perceptions of the effect of the care provided at MdF and perceptions of their specific needs. Results: A total of 67 women (mean age: 34 years old [Standard Deviation=9.7]) responded to our questionnaire (40 in the MdF, 12 in the MHC-1 and 15 in the MHC-2). PTSD diagnosis was retained for 40 women (59.7%) (PCL-5 score ≥33). The prevalence of PTSD was quite similar between the three groups. Around 30% of participants (n=23) self-rated their global health as bad or very bad, less than 30% (n=18) of women were regular smokers. Six months after inclusion, a half of participants (52.2%) had been reached by phone. Analysis of the nine qualitative interviews clarified victims-survivors’ perceptions of the MdF’s specific care: social networking, multidisciplinary approach, specialized listening, healthcare facilities, evasion and “feeling at home”. Conclusions The prevalence of PTSD was high among the three centers. This mixed-methods comparison will serve as a pilot study for a larger comparative trial to assess the impact of the MdF on victims-survivors’ mental health outcomes comparatively with the impact of non-dedicated structures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.