No abstract

Therapists’ emotion and therapist–client emotional congruence are associated with psychotherapy process and outcome. However, their presession emotional states are not consistently accounted for across studies, and the underlying mechanism is unclear. This study introduces the concepts of directional correspondence (DC), where therapists’ and clients’ emotions move in a similar direction from pre to postsession, and absolute agreement (AA), where therapist and client become closer in emotions from pre to postsession, to examine congruence in emotional change in therapist and client from pre to postsession. In addition, clients’ perception of therapist empathy was investigated as a mediator between therapists’ emotion/therapist–client emotional congruence and session outcome. Sixty nine clients and 49 therapists participated in this study over the course of therapy (593 sessions in total). They rated their emotions before and after each session, and clients rated therapist empathy and session quality after each session. Multilevel models showed that therapist presession emotions, therapist–client presession emotional similarity, and DC did not predict therapist empathy and session quality. However, AA predicted better therapist empathy, which in turn predicted better session quality. The partial mediation path was also stronger when therapist and client had more dissimilar presession emotions. Thus, clients may rate a session based on their perception of therapist empathy, which may reflect therapist and client moving toward more similar emotions over a session. In addition, the positive effect of therapist and client growing closer in emotions is especially pronounced when they start sessions in different emotional states. Implications of the findings are discussed.

IntroductionPrevious studies explored the preferences for therapists’ attire and office setting based on initial impressions as a reference for the formality in psychotherapy. This study examines the formality of psychotherapy by investigating therapists’ and clients’ use of discourse particles, the linguistic marker and quantifier of the formality in speech, in relation to therapist empathy in different stages of psychotherapy.MethodsFour psychotherapy sessions (representing early, mid, and late stages) each from 39 therapist-client dyads were analyzed. Trained observers rated therapist empathy in each session using the Therapist Empathy Scale.ResultsResults of multilevel modeling show that synchrony in particle usage, hence synchrony in formality, between clients and therapists is not associated with therapist empathy. Therapists’ use of particles (i.e., absolute formality of therapists) was also not associated with therapist empathy. In contrast, the relative formality of therapists plays significant roles: therapist empathy is generally observed when therapists are relatively more formal than the clients (i.e., lower relative usage of particles by the therapists when compared to the clients). However, for clients who speak formally with few particles, therapist casualness (i.e., higher relative usage of particles than the clients) at the beginning of therapy may be interpreted as therapist empathy as therapists help these clients ease into the therapeutic relationships.DiscussionOur results suggest that the examination of therapists’ and clients’ use of particles across different stages of treatment may illuminate dynamic interactional styles that facilitate or hinder the psychotherapy process.

No abstract

No abstract