The prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma (AI) on computed tomography (CT) in the general population has been reported to be as high as 4.2%. However, many of the previous studies in this field utilised a prospective approach with analysis of CT scans performed by one or more radiologists with a specialist interest in adrenal tumours and a specific focus on identifying the presence of an adrenal mass. A typical radiology department, with a focus on the patient's presenting complaint as opposed to the adrenal gland, may not be expected to diagnose as many adrenal incidentalomas as would be identified in a dedicated research protocol. We hypothesised that the number of AI reported in routine clinical practice is significantly lower than the published figures would suggest. We retrospectively reviewed the reports of all CT thorax and abdomen scans performed in our hospital over a 2 year period. 3,099 patients underwent imaging, with 3,705 scans performed. The median age was 63 years (range 18-98). Thirty-seven true AI were diagnosed during the time period studied. Twenty-two were diagnosed by CT abdomen (22/2,227) and 12 by CT thorax (12/1,478), a prevalence of 0.98 and 0.81% with CT abdomen and thorax, respectively, for AI in routine clinical practice.

Pemphigus is a group of rare and potentially fatal autoimmune blistering diseases that are associated with auto-antibodies that target intercellular adhesion molecules. Incidence of pemphigus varies among populations, with the lowest incidence in Switzerland and Finland at 0.6–0.76 per million per year and the highest in Jewish communities at 16.1–32 per million per year. Pemphigus is associated with devastating morbidity and despite advancements in our understanding of the disease and a widening array of therapeutic options, no cure exists. The delay in the development of a cure may in part be attributed to the absence of a standardized and completely validated severity outcome measures to allow for high-quality multicenter control studies. Such a tool is necessary to define the best practice in clinical studies, allow for accurate comparisons between study results, justify drug use within the clinical setting, and reduce the cost burden that is associated with the use of ineffective therapies. Utilizing outcome measures that are not validated provides an opportunity to synthesize outcome measures with the intent to favor particular treatments and thus produce false conclusions. According to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) group, a validation of these measurement instruments requires investigating their responsiveness, reliability, and validity. More than 116 outcome measures exist to assess pemphigus severity, of which the Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS), and Pemphigus Vulgaris Activity Score (PVAS) are the most comprehensively corroborated measures. With regard to validity and reliability, PDAI was unsurpassed by ABSIS and PVAS. Data indicate that ABSIS is more reliable than PVAS, but PVAS seems to have greater validity although the results are not consistent. PDAI, ABSIS, and PVAS have not yet had their responsiveness analyzed, which should be the next step to completely validate the outcome measures and conclusively determine which measure is superior.

No abstract

For patients who do not achieve adequate disease control on biologic monotherapy, or monotherapy with an oral-systemic agent such as methotrexate, combination biologic therapy may be considered. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case assessing the safety and efficacy of the combination of an interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor (risankizumab) with a tumour necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) inhibitor (golimumab) in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. After twelve months of treatment with risankizumab and golimumab, our patient experienced a significant improvement in his psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis without any adverse effects to date.

BackgroundConventional bacterial stool culture is one of the more time-consuming tests in a routine clinical microbiology laboratory. In addition, less than 5 % of stool cultures yield positive results. A molecular platform, the BD MAX™ System (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD) offers the potential for significantly more rapid results and less hands-on time. Time-motion analysis of the BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel (EBP) (BD Diagnostics, Quebec, Canada) on the BD MAX System was compared to conventional stool culture in the microbiology laboratory of a tertiary care pediatric hospital.MethodsThe process impact analysis of time-motion studies of conventional cultures were compared to those of EBP with 86 stool specimens. Sample flow, hands-on time, processing steps, and overall turnaround time were determined and analyzed. Data were obtained and analyzed from both standard operating procedures and direct observation. A regression analysis was performed to ensure consistency of measurements. Time and process measurements started when the specimens were logged into the accessioning area of the microbiology laboratory and were completed when actionable results were generated.ResultsWith conventional culture, negative culture results were available from 41:14:27 (hours:minutes:seconds) to 54:17:19; with EBP, positive and negative results were available from 2:28:40 to 3:33:39.ConclusionsThis study supports the suggestion that use of the EBP to detect commonly encountered stool pathogens can result in significant time savings and a shorter time-to-result for patients with acute bacterial diarrhea.

BackgroundThe BD MAX™ Enteric Bacterial Panel (BDM-EBP) is designed and FDA-cleared to detect Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Shiga toxin genes stx1/2 from stool samples. However, rectal swabs, which are not FDA-cleared for clinical testing with the BDM-EBP, are common specimens received from pediatric patients for enteric pathogen testing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the BDM-EBP to detect stool pathogens from rectal swabs.MethodsRoutine cultures, Shiga toxin testing, and molecular testing with BDM-EBP were performed on 272 sequential rectal swabs collected from August 2015 to December 2015. Discrepant test results were resolved using Verigene® Enteric Pathogens Nucleic Acid Test (EP). 36 challenge samples (13 Salmonella spp., 3 Shigella spp., 10 Campylobacter spp., and 10 Shiga toxin positive Escherichia coli) were tested using reference strains (American Type Culture Collection) and previous patient isolates diluted to103-104 cfu/ml in saline then added to Sample Buffer Tube (SBT) with negative stool matrix delivered via a swab. Limit of detection testing was performed by serial 10 fold dilutions in saline then added to SBT with negative stool matrix provided via a swab.ResultsA total of 272 rectal swab specimens were evaluated and 89 were positive by culture and/or MAX EBP. All discrepant results were BDM-EBP positive and culture negative. 21 of 31 (68%) of the apparent false positive BDM-EBP discrepant results resolved as positive with Nanosphere’s Verigene® EP. After resolution of the discordant results, the Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) are as follows for each target: Salmonella (n = 4) 100%, PPA and 100%, NPA; Shigella (n = 79) 100%, PPA and 95.3%, NPA; Campylobacter (n = 4) 100%, PPA and 99.6%, NPA; and Shiga toxin producing organisms (n = 2) 100%, PPA and 100%, NPA. 8.8% of the patient samples did not initially yield a result on the BDM-System. Upon repeat, half of the problematic samples resolved, and 4.4% of the total specimen tested did not yield a result. All organisms in the challenge samples were detected. Limits of detection for BDM-EBP testing of rectal swabs were as follows (in cfu/ml in SBT): Salmonella-1.44 × 102; Shigella-5.10 × 100; Campylobacter-1.51 × 101; and Shiga Toxin-1.13 ×103.ConclusionRectal swabs are acceptable samples for detecting Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Shiga toxin using BDM-EBP.

A group of patients with anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibody, or anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), may constitute a unique subtype of dermatomyositis. We compared the cutaneous, muscular and pulmonary manifestations between the ASS and non-ASS groups of dermatomyositis. We analyzed 59 patients with dermatomyositis referred to our university hospital from 2008 to 2016. The patients were examined for skin lesions, routine blood tests, autoantibody profiles using ELISA kits, skin biopsy, and radiological imaging of the lung and muscle diseases. The ELISA kit for measurement of anti-ARS antibodies is prepared to detect antibodies to Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, and KS. We also examined antibodies to TIF1-g, MDA5 and Mi-2. Of 59 patients with dermatomyositis, 20 patients were classified into the ASS group, and the remaining 39 patients were of the non-ASS. Patients with ASS more frequently presented with mechanic's hands (p¼0.012), and systemic symptoms such as fever (p¼0.019) and arthralgia (p¼0.0037), associated with elevated serum levels of C-reactive protein (p¼0.0029). Nineteen of 20 (95%) patients with ASS had interstitial lung disease (ILD) with fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (fNSIP) or organizing pneumonia/eosinophilic pneumonia (OP/EP) pattern by computed tomographic imaging. Blood chemistry tests revealed significantly higher serum levels of aldolase (ALD) in the ASS group (p¼0.0022), although no clear difference in the serum levels of creatinine phosphokinase (CK). As for magnetic resonance imaging of myopathy, patients with ASS showed the presence of fasciitis as well as myositis more frequently (p¼0.0041). Patients with ASS are characterized by the higher incidence of mechanic's hands, systemic inflammation, ILD, and inflammatory myopathy associated with fasciitis, and elevated serum levels of ALD.

No abstract