Many plants, including Arabidopsis, increase in freezing tolerance in response to low, nonfreezing temperatures, a phenomenon known as cold acclimation. Previous studies established that cold acclimation involves rapid expression of the CBF transcriptional activators (also known as DREB1 proteins) in response to low temperature followed by induction of the CBF regulon (CBF-targeted genes), which contributes to an increase in freezing tolerance. Here, we present the results of transcriptome-profiling experiments indicating the existence of multiple low-temperature regulatory pathways in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. The transcript levels of ‫ف‬ 8000 genes were determined at multiple times after plants were transferred from warm to cold temperature and in warm-grown plants that constitutively expressed CBF1, CBF2, or CBF3. A total of 306 genes were identified as being cold responsive, with transcripts for 218 genes increasing and those for 88 genes decreasing threefold or more at one or more time points during the 7-day experiment. These results indicate that extensive downregulation of gene expression occurs during cold acclimation. Of the cold-responsive genes, 48 encode known or putative transcription factors. Two of these, RAP2.1 and RAP2.6, were activated by CBF expression and thus presumably control subregulons of the CBF regulon. Transcriptome comparisons indicated that only 12% of the cold-responsive genes are certain members of the CBF regulon. Moreover, at least 28% of the cold-responsive genes were not regulated by the CBF transcription factors, including 15 encoding known or putative transcription factors, indicating that these cold-responsive genes are members of different low-temperature regulons. Significantly, CBF expression at warm temperatures repressed the expression of eight genes that also were downregulated by low temperature, indicating that in addition to gene induction, gene repression is likely to play an integral role in cold acclimation.

Summary The CBF cold response pathway has a prominent role in cold acclimation. The pathway includes action of three transcription factors, CBF1, 2 and 3 (also known as DREB1b, c and a, respectively), that are rapidly induced in response to low temperature followed by expression of the CBF-targeted genes (the CBF regulon) that act in concert to increase plant-freezing tolerance. The results of transcriptome profiling and mutagenesis experiments, however, indicate that additional cold response pathways exist and may have important roles in life at low temperature. To further understand the roles that the CBF proteins play in configuring the low temperature transcriptome and to identify additional transcription factors with roles in cold acclimation, we used the Affymetrix GeneChip containing probe sets for approximately 24,000 Arabidopsis genes to define a core set of cold-responsive genes and to determine which genes were targets of CBF2 and 6 other transcription factors that appeared to be coordinately regulated with CBF2. A total of 514 genes were placed in the core set of cold-responsive genes, 302 of which were upregulated and 212 downregulated. Hierarchical clustering and bioinformatic analysis indicated that the 514 cold-responsive transcripts could be assigned to one of seven distinct expression classes and identified multiple potential novel cis-acting cold-regulatory elements. Eighty-five cold-induced genes and eight cold-repressed genes were assigned to the CBF2 regulon. An additional nine cold-induced genes and 15 cold-repressed genes were assigned to a regulon controlled by ZAT12. Of the 25 core cold-induced genes that were most highly upregulated (induced over 15-fold), 19 genes (84%) were induced by CBF2 and another two genes (8%) were regulated by both CBF2 and ZAT12. Thus, the large majority (92%) of the most highly induced genes belong to the CBF and ZAT12 regulons. Constitutive expression of ZAT12 in Arabidopsis caused a small, but reproducible, increase in freezing tolerance, indicating a role for the ZAT12 regulon in cold acclimation. In addition, ZAT12 downregulated the expression of the CBF genes indicating a role for ZAT12 in a negative regulatory circuit that dampens expression of the CBF cold response pathway.

Flowering of Arabidopsis is promoted by long days and delayed by short days. Mutations in the GIGANTEA (GI) gene delay flowering under long days but have little or no effect under short days. We have now isolated the GI gene and show that it encodes a novel, putative membrane protein. By comparing the sequence of the Arabidopsis gene with that of a likely rice orthologue and by sequencing mutant alleles, we identify regions of the GI protein that are likely to be important for its function. We show that GI expression is regulated by the circadian clock with a peak in transcript levels 8-10 h after dawn. The timing, height and duration of this peak are influenced by daylength. We analysed the interactions between GI and the LHY, CCA1 and ELF3 genes, previously shown to affect daylength responses; we show that the rhythmic pattern of GI expression is altered in the elf3, CCA1-OX and lhy genotypes, and that CCA1 and LHY expression are reduced by gi mutations. Our results are consistent with the idea that GI plays an important role in regulating the expression of flowering time genes during the promotion of flowering by photoperiod.

The Arabidopsis CBF cold response pathway has a central role in cold acclimation, the process whereby plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low nonfreezing temperatures. Here we examined the changes that occur in the Arabidopsis metabolome in response to low temperature and assessed the role of the CBF cold response pathway in bringing about these modifications. Of 434 metabolites monitored by GC-time-of-flight MS, 325 (75%) were found to increase in Arabidopsis Wassilewskija-2 (Ws-2) plants in response to low temperature. Of these 325 metabolites, 256 (79%) also increased in nonacclimated Ws-2 plants in response to overexpression of C-repeat͞dehydration responsive elementbinding factor (CBF)3. Extensive cold-induced changes also occurred in the metabolome of Arabidopsis Cape Verde Islands-1 (Cvi-1) plants, which were found to be less freezing tolerant than Ws-2 plants. However, low-temperature-induced expression of CBF1, CBF2, CBF3, and CBF-targeted genes was much lower in Cvi-1 than in Ws-2 plants, and the low-temperature metabolome of Cvi-1 plants was depleted in metabolites affected by CBF3 overexpression. Taken together, the results indicate that the metabolome of Arabidopsis is extensively reconfigured in response to low temperature, and that the CBF cold response pathway has a prominent role in this process. Many plants have the ability to sense low temperature and respond by activating mechanisms that lead to an increase in freezing tolerance, an adaptive process known as cold acclimation (1, 2). At present, the best-understood genetic system with a role in cold acclimation is the Arabidopsis CBF cold response pathway (3). Exposing Arabidopsis plants to low temperature results in rapid induction of a small family of genes encoding transcriptional activators known either as C-repeat (CRT)͞dehydration responsive element (DRE)-binding factor (CBF)1, -2, and -3 (4-6) or DREB1b, -c, and -a, respectively (7). These genes encode transcription factors that belong to the AP2͞ERF domain family of DNA-binding proteins (8). The CBF1-3 proteins recognize a cis-acting regulatory element known as the CRT͞DRE present in the promoters of many cold-inducible genes, including COR15a and COR78͞RD29a (4, 9, 10). Expression of the Ͼ100 genes that comprise the CBF regulon, i.e., those cold-regulated genes that are responsive to CBF expression (refs. 11-13; J. Vogel and M.F.T., unpublished data), then brings about an increase in freezing tolerance. This increase in freezing tolerance involves the action of multiple mechanisms, including the production of cryoprotective polypeptides, such as COR15a (14), and synthesis of low molecular-weight cryoprotectants, including proline and raffinose (15,16).Genetic studies suggest that the CBF cold response pathway is not the only system that contributes to freezing tolerance. The eskimo1 mutant of Arabidopsis (17) is constitutively more freezing tolerant than wild-type plants, yet the COR genes are not expressed, indicating that the mutation affects a pathway outside the C...

When Arabidopsis is exposed to low temperature a small gene family encoding transcription factors known as CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 (also referred to as DREB1b, DREB1c, and DREB1a, respectively) is rapidly induced followed by expression of CBF-targeted genes, the CBF regulon, which act to bring about an increase in freezing tolerance. The CBF1, 2 and 3 proteins, though highly similar in amino acid sequence, are not identical, raising the question of whether the proteins have the same functions. Here we explored this issue by comparing the effects that overexpression of each CBF gene had on Arabidopsis growth and development, proline and sugar composition, freezing tolerance and gene expression. Taken together, the results support the conclusion that the CBF1, 2 and 3 transcriptional activators have redundant functional activities.

The circadian clock acts as the timekeeping mechanism in photoperiodism. In Arabidopsis thaliana, a circadian clockcontrolled flowering pathway comprising the genes GIGANTEA (GI), CONSTANS (CO), and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) promotes flowering specifically under long days. Within this pathway, GI regulates circadian rhythms and flowering and acts earlier in the hierarchy than CO and FT, suggesting that GI might regulate flowering indirectly by affecting the control of circadian rhythms. We studied the relationship between the roles of GI in flowering and the circadian clock using late elongated hypocotyl circadian clock associated1 double mutants, which are impaired in circadian clock function, plants overexpressing GI (35S:GI), and gi mutants. These experiments demonstrated that GI acts between the circadian oscillator and CO to promote flowering by increasing CO and FT mRNA abundance. In addition, circadian rhythms in expression of genes that do not control flowering are altered in 35S:GI and gi mutant plants under continuous light and continuous darkness, and the phase of expression of these genes is changed under diurnal cycles. Therefore, GI plays a general role in controlling circadian rhythms, and this is different from its effect on the amplitude of expression of CO and FT. Functional GI:green fluorescent protein is localized to the nucleus in transgenic Arabidopsis plants, supporting the idea that GI regulates flowering in the nucleus. We propose that the effect of GI on flowering is not an indirect effect of its role in circadian clock regulation, but rather that GI also acts in the nucleus to more directly promote the expression of flowering-time genes. INTRODUCTIONInduction of flowering in response to daylength synchronizes flowering to the changing seasons and is believed to be important in adaptation of plants to growth at different latitudes (Ray and Alexander, 1966). Physiological experiments implicated the circadian clock as the timekeeping mechanism that enables the measurement of daylength Yanovsky and Kay, 2003). Forward genetics in Arabidopsis thaliana identified a genetic pathway that promotes flowering specifically on exposure to long days (LDs) (Searle and Coupland, 2004), and the role of the circadian clock in photoperiodic time measurement was confirmed by demonstrating that transcription of the genes that act in this pathway is circadian clock controlled. Mutations in one of these genes, GIGANTEA (GI), both impair circadian rhythms and delay flowering. Here, we use moleculargenetic approaches to compare the role of GI in the circadian system with its function in controlling flowering. GI, CONSTANS (CO), and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)were placed in the Arabidopsis photoperiod pathway based on genetic analysis (Redei, 1962;Koornneef et al., 1991Koornneef et al., , 1998. Loss-offunction mutations in each of these genes delay flowering under LDs but have little or no effect under short days (SDs). Genetic epistasis and analysis of expression of these three genes in mutant and wild-type background...

SummaryMany plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low temperature, a process known as cold acclimation. In Arabidopsis, cold acclimation involves action of the CBF cold response pathway. Key components of the pathway include rapid cold-induced expression of three homologous genes encoding transcriptional activators, CBF1, 2 and 3 (also known as DREB1b, c and a, respectively), followed by expression of CBF-targeted genes, the CBF regulon, that increase freezing tolerance. Unlike Arabidopsis, tomato cannot cold acclimate raising the question of whether it has a functional CBF cold response pathway. Here we show that tomato, like Arabidopsis, encodes three CBF homologs, LeCBF1-3 (Lycopersicon esculentum CBF1-3), that are present in tandem array in the genome. Only the tomato LeCBF1 gene, however, was found to be coldinducible. As is the case for Arabidopsis CBF1-3, transcripts for LeCBF1-3 did accumulate in response to mechanical agitation, but not in response to drought, ABA or high salinity. Constitutive overexpression of LeCBF1 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants induced expression of CBF-targeted genes and increased freezing tolerance indicating that LeCBF1 encodes a functional homolog of the Arabidopsis CBF1-3 proteins. However, constitutive overexpression of either LeCBF1 or AtCBF3 in transgenic tomato plants did not increase freezing tolerance. Gene expression studies, including the use of a cDNA microarray representing approximately 8000 tomato genes, identified only four genes that were induced 2.5-fold or more in the LeCBF1 or AtCBF3 overexpressing plants, three of which were putative members of the tomato CBF regulon as they were also upregulated in response to low temperature. Additional experiments indicated that of eight tomato genes that were likely orthologs of Arabidopsis CBF regulon genes, none were responsive to CBF overexpression in tomato. From these results, we conclude that tomato has a complete CBF cold response pathway, but that the tomato CBF regulon differs from that of Arabidopsis and appears to be considerably smaller and less diverse in function.

Exposing Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants to low temperature results in rapid induction of CBF1, 2, and 3 (CBF1-3; also known as DREB1B, C, and A, respectively), which encode transcriptional activators that induce expression of a battery of genes that increase plant freezing and chilling tolerance. Recently, it has been shown that basal levels of CBF3 transcripts and those of certain CBF-regulated genes exhibit circadian cycling. Here, we further explored the regulation of CBF1-3 by the circadian clock. The results indicated that the extent to which CBF1-3 transcripts accumulated in response to low temperature was dependent on the time of day that the plants were exposed to low temperature and that this was regulated by the circadian clock. The highest and lowest levels of cold-induced CBF1-3 transcript accumulation occurred at 4 and 16 h after subjective dawn, respectively. An analysis of CBF2 promoter-reporter gene fusions indicated that this control included transcriptional regulation. In addition, the cold responsiveness of RAV1 and ZAT12, genes that are cold induced in parallel with CBF1-3, was also subject to circadian regulation. However, whereas the maximum level of cold-induced RAV1 transcript accumulation occurred at the same time of day as did CBF1-3 transcripts, that of ZAT12 was in reverse phase, i.e. the highest level of coldinduced ZAT12 transcript accumulation occurred 16 h after subjective dawn. These results indicate that cold-induced expression of CBF1-3, RAV1, and ZAT12 is gated by the circadian clock and suggest that this regulation likely occurs through at least two nonidentical (though potentially overlapping) signaling pathways.Many plants have the ability to sense low temperature and respond by activating mechanisms that lead to an increase in freezing tolerance, an adaptive response known as cold acclimation (Thomashow, 1999;Smallwood and Bowles, 2002). At present, the best understood genetic system that has a role in cold acclimation is the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBF coldresponse pathway (Thomashow, 2001). Exposing Arabidopsis plants to low temperature results in rapid induction of a small family of transcriptional activators known either as CBF1, 2, and 3 (CBF1-3; Stockinger et al., 1997;Gilmour et al., 1998;Medina et al., 1999) or as DREB1B, C, and A, respectively (Liu et al., 1998). These transcription factors, which belong to the AP2/ERF domain family of DNA-binding proteins (Riechmann and Meyerowitz, 1998), recognize a cis-acting regulatory element known as the C-repeat/dehydration response element (CRT/DRE; Baker et al., 1994;Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki, 1994;Stockinger et al., 1997) that is present in the promoters of many cold-inducible genes such as COR15A and COR78 (also known as RD29A and LTI78). Transgenic plants overexpressing CBF1, 2, or 3 constitutively express CBFtargeted cold-induced genes, the CBF regulon, and exhibit an increase in freezing tolerance that is independent of a cold stimulus (Jaglo-Ottosen et al., 1998;Liu et al., 1998).Transc...