Objectives We aimed to evaluate gadopiclenol, a newly developed extracellular nonspecific macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) having high relaxivity properties, which was designed to increase lesion detection and characterization by magnetic resonance imaging. Methods We described the molecular structure of gadopiclenol and measured the r 1 and r 2 relaxivity properties at fields of 0.47 and 1.41 T in water and human serum. Nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion profile measurements were performed from 0.24 mT to 7 T. Protonation and complexation constants were determined using pH-metric measurements, and we investigated the acid-assisted dissociation of gadopiclenol, gadodiamide, gadobutrol, and gadoterate at 37°C and pH 1.2. Applying the relaxometry technique (37°C, 0.47 T), we investigated the risk of dechelation of gadopiclenol, gadoterate, and gadodiamide in the presence of ZnCl 2 (2.5 mM) and a phosphate buffer (335 mM). Pharmacokinetics studies of radiolabeled 153 Gd-gadopiclenol were performed in Beagle dogs, and protein binding was measured in rats, dogs, and humans plasma and red blood cells. Results Gadopiclenol [gadolinium chelate of 2,2′,2″-(3,6,9-triaza-1(2,6)-pyridinacyclodecaphane-3,6,9-triyl)tris(5-((2,3-dihydroxypropyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoic acid); registry number 933983-75-6] is based on a pyclen macrocyclic structure. Gadopiclenol exhibited a very high relaxivity in water (r 1 = 12.2 mM −1 ·s −1 at 1.41 T), and the r 1 value in human serum at 37°C did not markedly change with increasing field (r 1 = 12.8 mM −1 ·s −1 at 1.41 T and 11.6 mM −1 ·s −1 at 3 T). The relaxivity data in human serum did not indicate protein binding. The nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion profile of gadopiclenol exhibited a high and stable relaxivity in a strong magnetic field. Gadopiclenol showed high kinetic inertness under acidic conditions, with a dissociation half-life of 20 ± 3 days compared with 4 ± 0.5 days for gadoterate, 18 hours for gadobutrol, and less than 5 seconds for gadodiamide and gadopentetate. The pharmacokinetic profile in dogs was typical of extracellular nonspecific GBCAs, showing distribution in the extracellular compartment and no metabolism. No protein binding was found in rats, dogs, and humans. Conclusions Gadopiclenol is a new extracellular and macrocyclic Gd chelate that exhibited high relaxivity, no protein binding, and high kinetic inertness. Its pharmacokinetic profile in dogs was similar to that of other extracellular nonspecific GBCAs.
While important efforts were made in the development of positron emission tomography (PET) tracers for the in vivo molecular diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, very few investigations to develop magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) probes were performed. Here, a new generation of Gd(III)-based contrast agents (CAs) is proposed to detect the amyloid β-protein (Aβ) aggregates by MRI, one of the earliest biological hallmarks of the pathology. A building block strategy was used to synthesize a library of 16 CAs to investigate structure-activity relationships (SARs) on physicochemical properties and binding affinity for the Aβ aggregates. Three types of blocks were used to modulate the CA structures: (i) the Gd(III) chelates (Gd(III)-DOTA and Gd(III)-PCTA), (ii) the biovectors (2-arylbenzothiazole, 2-arylbenzoxazole and stilbene derivatives) and (iii) the linkers (neutrals, positives and negatives with several lengths). These investigations revealed unexpected SARs and a difficulty of these probes to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). General insights for the development of Gd(III)-based CAs to detect the Aβ aggregates are described.
Objectives: The aim of the set of studies was to compare gadopiclenol, a new high relaxivity gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agent (GBCA) to gadobenate dimeglumine in terms of small brain lesion enhancement and Gd retention, including T1 enhancement in the cerebellum. Materials and Methods: In a first study, T1 enhancement at 0.1 mmol/kg body weight (bw) of gadopiclenol or gadobenate dimeglumine was evaluated in a small brain lesions rat model at 2.35 T. The 2 GBCAs were injected in an alternated and cross-over manner separated by an interval of 4.4 ± 1.0 hours (minimum, 3.5 hours; maximum, 6.1 hours; n = 6). In a second study, the passage of the GBCAs into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was evaluated by measuring the fourth ventricle T1 enhancement in healthy rats at 4.7 T over 23 minutes after a single intravenous (IV) injection of 1.2 mmol/kg bw of gadopiclenol or gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 6/group). In a third study, Gd retention at 1 month was evaluated in healthy rats who had received 20 IV injections of 1 of the 2 GBCAs (0.6 mmol/kg bw) or a similar volume of saline (n = 10/group) over 5 weeks. T1 enhancement of the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) was assessed by T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 2.35 T, performed before the injection and thereafter once a week up to 1 month after the last injection. Elemental Gd levels in central nervous system structures, in muscle and in plasma were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) 1 month after the last injection. Results: The first study in a small brain lesion rat model showed a ≈2-fold higher number of enhanced voxels in lesions with gadopiclenol compared with gadobenate dimeglumine. T1 enhancement of the fourth ventricle was observed in the first minutes after a single IV injection of gadopiclenol or gadobenate dimeglumine (study 2), resulting, in the case of gadopiclenol, in transient enhancement during the injection period of the repeated administrations study (study 3). In terms of Gd retention, T1 enhancement of the DCN was noted in the gadobenate dimeglumine group during the month after the injection period. No such enhancement of the DCN was observed in the gadopiclenol group. Gadolinium concentrations 1 month after the injection period in the gadopiclenol group were slightly increased in plasma and lower by a factor of 2 to 3 in the CNS structures and muscles, compared with gadobenate dimeglumine. Conclusions: In the small brain lesion rat model, gadopiclenol provides significantly higher enhancement of brain lesions compared with gadobentate dimeglumine at the same dose. After repeated IV injections, as expected for a macrocyclic GBCA, Gd retention is minimalized in the case of gadopiclenol compared with gadobenate dimeglumine, resulting in no T1 hypersignal in the DCN.
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), a disease occurring in patients with severe renal failure, may be linked to injections of gadolinium chelates, contrast agents used for magnetic resonance imaging. A hypothesis frequently proposed to explain NSF is dissociation of Gd(3+) from its chelate, possibly from a deep storage compartment. Numerous in vivo and in vitro studies have been performed in an attempt to determine the extent of this dechelation and to understand its mechanism. Proton-assisted dechelation and transmetallation are the most widely described mechanisms of dechelation. This study investigated the possible ligand exchange role played by phosphate in the dechelation mechanism. Omniscan(®) dechelation was monitored in vitro by relaxivity measurements performed at physiological pH with different concentrations of phosphate buffer and in the presence of endogenous cations. Dechelation experiments performed on phosphate buffer alone showed that phosphate may induce gadolinium release by ligand exchange when the phosphate concentration in the buffer is higher than 130 mM for an Omniscan(®) concentration of 1.25 mM. This corresponds to a Gd/phosphate ratio of 10(-2). This ratio could be reached in vivo, especially in deep compartments such as bone. The presence of endogenous cations (Zn(2+), Cu(2+) or Ca(2+)) has also been demonstrated to accelerate the kinetics of gadolinium release, either by catalysing ligand exchange or by inducing a transmetallation mechanism. The Omniscan(®) formulation was also tested and the added Ca-DTPA-BMA was shown to increase dechelation kinetics in these experiments. This striking result may question the value of the Omniscan(®) formulation in the context of NSF.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.