In hip fracture surgery, tranexamic acid reduces erythrocyte transfusion but may promote a hypercoagulable state. Thus, further evaluation of safety is required before recommending the off-label use of tranexamic acid.

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) resistant or intolerant to ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are at high risk of experiencing poor outcomes due to disease biology and inadequate efficacy and/or safety of current therapies. Asciminib is a first-in-class STAMP (Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket) inhibitor with the potential to overcome resistance or intolerance to approved TKIs. In this phase 3, open-label study, patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs were randomized (2:1) to receive asciminib 40 mg twice daily vs bosutinib 500 mg once daily. Randomization was stratified by major cytogenetic response (MCyR) status at baseline. The primary objective was to compare the major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 24 for asciminib vs bosutinib. Two hundred and thirty-three patients were randomized to asciminib (n=157) or bosutinib (n=76). Median follow-up was 14.9 months. The MMR rate at week 24 was 25.5% with asciminib and 13.2% with bosutinib. The difference in MMR rate between treatment arms, after adjusting for MCyR at baseline, was 12.2% (95% CI, 2.19-22.30; 2-sided P=.029). Fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (50.6% vs 60.5%) and fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (5.8% vs 21.1%) occurred with asciminib than with bosutinib. The study showed a superior efficacy of asciminib compared with that of bosutinib, together with a favorable safety profile. These results support the use of asciminib as a new therapy in patients with CML-CP who are resistant or intolerant to ≥2 prior TKIs. The trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03106779.

Summary. Background: The clinical significance of symptomatic isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is uncertain. Consequently, this leads to important disparities in its management. Objective: To examine the clinical history of isolated distal DVT and to compare it with that of proximal DVT. Methods: Using data from the international, prospective, RIETE registry on patients with confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), we compared the risk factors and 3‐month outcome in patients with isolated distal DVT vs. proximal DVT. Results: Eleven thousand and eighty‐six patients with symptomatic DVT, but without pulmonary embolism, were included between 2001 and 2008; 1921 (17.3%) exhibited isolated distal DVT. Anticoagulant treatment was received by 89.1% (1680/1885) of isolated distal DVT and 91.8% (7911/8613) of proximal DVT patients for the entire follow‐up period. Isolated distal DVTs were more associated with transient risk factors (i.e. recent travel, hospitalization, recent surgery), whereas proximal DVTs were more associated with chronic states (i.e. ≥75 years or with active cancer). At 3 months, major bleeding rate was lower in patients with isolated distal DVT (1.0% vs. 2.2%, P < 0.01), whereas VTE recurrence rate was equivalent (2.0% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.07). The mortality rate was lower in patients with isolated distal DVT (2.7% vs. 7.5%; P < 0.001); this was mainly due to a lower rate of non‐VTE‐related deaths (2.2% vs. 6.3%; P < 0.001). Active cancer was the main predictive factor of death in patients with isolated distal DVT. Conclusions: Proximal and isolated distal DVT patients differ in terms of risk factors and clinical outcomes, suggesting different populations. In the short term, the life expectancy of patients with isolated distal DVT depended chiefly on their cancer status.

No abstract

Serum procalcitonin level may become a useful marker for the diagnosis of SBP in cirrhotic patients. The low ratio of ascitic fluid to serum procalcitonin supports the hypothesis that procalcitonin is not produced intraperitoneally.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a moderate risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), but neither the clinical presentation nor the outcome of VTE in COPD patients is well known.The clinical presentation of VTE, namely pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and the outcome at 3 months (death, recurrent VTE or bleeding) were compared between 2,984 COPD patients and 25,936 non-COPD patients included in the RIETE (Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry. This ongoing international, multicentre registry includes patients with proven symptomatic PE or DVT.PE was the more frequent VTE presentation in COPD patients (n51,761, 59%). PE presentation was more significantly associated with COPD patients than non-COPD patients (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.49-1.80). During the 3-month follow-up, mortality (10.8% versus 7.6%), minor bleeding (4.5% versus 2.3%) or first VTE recurrences as PE (1.5% versus 1.1%) were significantly higher in COPD patients than in non-COPD patients. PE was the most common cause of death.COPD patients presented more frequently with PE than DVT. It may explain the worse prognosis of COPD patients, with a higher risk of death, bleeding or VTE recurrences as PE compared with non-COPD patients. Further therapeutic options are needed.

Key Points Nilotinib demonstrated efficacy and a manageable safety profile in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed and pretreated Ph+ CML-CP.

No abstract