Abstract. Approaches used to assess shallow slide susceptibility at the basin scale are conceptually different depending on the use of statistical or physically based methods. The former are based on the assumption that the same causes are more likely to produce the same effects, whereas the latter are based on the comparison between forces which tend to promote movement along the slope and the counteracting forces that are resistant to motion. Within this general framework, this work tests two hypotheses: (i) although conceptually and methodologically distinct, the statistical and deterministic methods generate similar shallow slide susceptibility results regarding the model's predictive capacity and spatial agreement; and (ii) the combination of shallow slide susceptibility maps obtained with statistical and physically based methods, for the same study area, generate a more reliable susceptibility model for shallow slide occurrence. These hypotheses were tested at a small test site (13.9 km 2 ) located north of Lisbon (Portugal), using a statistical method (the information value method, IV) and a physically based method (the infinite slope method, IS). The landslide susceptibility maps produced with the statistical and deterministic methods were combined into a new landslide susceptibility map. The latter was based on a set of integration rules defined by the cross tabulation of the susceptibility classes of both maps and analysis of the corresponding contingency tables. The results demonstrate a higher predictive capacity of the new shallow slide susceptibility map, which combines the independent results obtained with statistical and physically based models. Moreover, the combination of the two models allowed the identification of areas where the results of the information value and the infinite slope methods are contradictory. Thus, these areas were classified as uncertain and deserve additional investigation at a more detailed scale.
Abstract. Approaches used to assess shallow slides susceptibility at the basin scale are conceptually different depending on the use of empirically-based or physically-based methods. The former are sustained by the assumption that the same causes are more likely to produce the same effects, whereas the latter are based on the comparison between forces which tend to promote movement along the slope and the opposing forces that promote resistance to movement. Within this general framework, this work tests two hypotheses: (i) although conceptually and methodological distinct, the statistic and deterministic methods generate similar shallow slides susceptibility results regarding the model’s predictive capacity and spatial agreement; and (ii) the combination of shallow slides susceptibility maps obtained with empirically-based and physically-based methods, for the same study area, generate a more reliable susceptibility model for shallow slides occurrence. These hypotheses were tested in a small test site (13.9 km2) located north of Lisbon (Portugal), using a empirically-based method (the Information Value method) and a physically-based method (the Infinite Slope method). The landslide susceptibility maps produced with the statistic and deterministic methods were combined into a new landslide susceptibility map. The latter was based on a set of integration rules defined by the cross-tabulation of the susceptibility classes of both maps and analysis of the corresponding contingency tables. The results demonstrate a higher predictive capacity of the new shallow slides susceptibility map, which combines the independent results obtained with empirically-based and physically-based models. Moreover the combination of the two models allowed the identification of areas where the results of the Information Value and the Infinite Slope methods are contradictory. Thus, these areas were classified as uncertain and deserve additional investigation at a more detailed scale.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.