Longitudinal, remote monitoring of motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD) could enable more precise treatment decisions. We developed the Motor fluctuations Monitor for Parkinson’s Disease (MM4PD), an ambulatory monitoring system that used smartwatch inertial sensors to continuously track fluctuations in resting tremor and dyskinesia. We designed and validated MM4PD in 343 participants with PD, including a longitudinal study of up to 6 months in a 225-subject cohort. MM4PD measurements correlated to clinical evaluations of tremor severity (ρ = 0.80) and mapped to expert ratings of dyskinesia presence (P < 0.001) during in-clinic tasks. MM4PD captured symptom changes in response to treatment that matched the clinician’s expectations in 94% of evaluated subjects. In the remaining 6% of cases, symptom data from MM4PD identified opportunities to make improvements in pharmacologic strategy. These results demonstrate the promise of MM4PD as a tool to support patient-clinician communication, medication titration, and clinical trial design.
PRS Global Open • 2022 flaps. 30-day mortality following reconstruction was 3.9%. Median length-of-stay after initial debridement was 8 days (IQR5-15). Of patients with flaps, 54 (48%) required multiple debridements prior to closure, and 30 (27%) underwent reoperation after flap closure. Patients who needed only a single debridement were significantly less likely to have a complication requiring reoperation (N= 10/58 vs 20/54, 17% vs 37%, p=0.02), undergo a second flap (N=6/58 vs 17/54, 10% vs 32%, p<0.001) or, if plated, require removal of sternal plates (N=6/58 vs 11/22, 18% vs 50%, p=0.02).
CONCLUSION:Although sternal dehiscence remains a complex challenge, an aggressive treatment algorithm, including debridement, flap closure and consideration of RSF, can achieve good long-term outcomes. In appropriately selected patients, RSF does not appear to increase the risk of reoperation. We hypothesize that earlier surgical intervention, before the development of systemic symptoms, may be associated with improved outcomes.
Tissue engineering has been successful in reproducing human skin equivalents while incorporating new approaches such as three‐dimensional (3D) bioprinting. The latter method offers a plethora of advantages including increased production scale, ability to incorporate multiple cell types and printing on demand. However, the quality of printed skin equivalents compared to those developed manually has never been assessed. To leverage the benefits of this method, it is imperative that 3D‐printed skin should be structurally and functionally similar to real human skin. Here, we developed four bilayered human skin epidermal‐dermal equivalents: non‐printed dermis and epidermis (NN), printed dermis and epidermis (PP), printed epidermis and non‐printed dermis (PN), and non‐printed epidermis and printed dermis (NP). The effects of printing induced shear stress [0.025 kPa (epidermis); 0.049 kPa (dermis)] were characterized both at the cellular and at the tissue level. At cellular level, no statistically significant differences in keratinocyte colony‐forming efficiency (CFE) (p = 0.1641) were observed. In the case of fibroblasts, no significant differences in the cell alignment index (p < 0.1717) and their ability to contract collagen gel (p = 0.851) were detected. At the tissue levels, all the four skin equivalents were characterized using histological and immunohistochemical analysis with no significant differences found in either epidermal basal cell count, thickness of viable epidermis, and relative intensity of filaggrin and claudin‐1. Our results demonstrated that 3D printing can achieve the same high‐quality skin constructs as have been developed traditionally, thus opening new avenues for numerous high‐throughput industrial and clinical applications.
Background:
For over 100 years, autologous skin grafts have remained the gold standard for the reconstruction of wounds but are limited in availability. Acellular tissue-engineered skin constructs (acellular TCs) and cellular tissue-engineered skin constructs (cellular TCs) may address these limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare outcomes between them.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines, querying MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane to assess graft incorporation, failure, and wound healing. Case reports/series, reviews, in vitro/in vivo work, non-English articles or articles without full text were excluded.
Results:
Sixty-six articles encompassing 4076 patients were included. No significant differences were found between graft failure rates (P = 0.07) and mean difference of percent reepithelialization (p = 0.92) when split-thickness skin grafts were applied alone versus co-grafted with acellular TCs. Similar mean Vancouver Scar Scale was found for these two groups (p = 0.09). Twenty-one studies used at least one cellular TC. Weighted averages from pooled results did not reveal statistically significant differences in mean reepithelialization or failure rates for epidermal cellular TCs compared with split-thickness skin grafts (p = 0.55).
Conclusions:
This systematic review is the first to illustrate comparable functional and wound healing outcomes between split-thickness skin grafts alone and those co-grafted with acellular TCs. The use of cellular TCs seems promising from preliminary findings. However, these results are limited in clinical applicability due to the heterogeneity of study data, and further level 1 evidence is required to determine the safety and efficacy of these constructs.
Hemophilia C is a rare bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency in clotting factor XI (fXI) and has no standard of care for preoperative optimization before cardiac surgery. Normalization of fXI levels in patients with hemophilia C can be achieved with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), which sometimes results in allergic reactions. We present a case of a patient with hemophilia C requiring coronary artery bypass grafting surgery who developed an allergic reaction to FFP. Our report underscores the balance between thrombosis and bleeding risks when devising a perioperative plan for patients with hemophilia C.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.