Purpose of review-To review the recently published data and provide a practical overview for management of systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Recent Findings-Published evidence shows considerable practitioner variability in screening patients for ILD. Recent published data supports use of cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil as first line treatment of SSc-ILD. For patients not responding to first line therapies, consideration is given to rituximab as rescue therapy. Recent trials of hematopoietic autologous stem cell transplantation have demonstrated benefit in patients with progressive SSc-ILD. Antifibrotic agents are approved in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; studies with anti-fibrotics are underway for SSc-ILD. Summary-The specter of rapidly progressive lung disease requires clinicians to risk stratify patients according to known predictors for progression and rigorously monitor for symptoms and advancing disease. The above-mentioned therapies promise improved efficacy and favorable side effect profiles compared to cyclophosphamide.

Objective Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of death in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are commonly used to screen for ILD in patients with SSc, studies have shown that they lack sensitivity for the detection of ILD in general SSc cohorts. This study was undertaken to assess the performance characteristics of PFTs for the detection of ILD in patients with early diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), a population at high risk for the development of ILD. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the Prospective Registry of Early Systemic Sclerosis at 11 sites in the US between April 2012 and January 2019. Patients were included if they underwent spirometry and high‐resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest. We calculated the performance characteristics of PFTs for the detection of ILD on HRCT. Results The study included 212 patients, 54% of whom had radiographic ILD. For the detection of ILD on HRCT imaging, a forced vital capacity (FVC) <80% predicted had a sensitivity of 63%. The combination of FVC <80% predicted or diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) <80% predicted improved the sensitivity to 85%. An FVC <80% predicted had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 61%, while the combination of FVC <80% predicted or DLco <80% predicted had an NPV of 70%. Conclusion PFTs alone are an inadequate screening tool for the diagnosis of ILD in patients with early dcSSc. HRCT should be part of the ILD screening algorithm in patients with dcSSc.

IntroductionPulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is one of the leading causes of mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We explored the impact of the updated haemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH), as proposed by the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension.MethodsIn this single-centre retrospective analysis, patients with SSc who had right heart catheterisation (RHC) were included. We compared the prior PH definition to the updated PH definition. The prior definition classified PH as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg and further divided into pre-capillary PH (PAH and PH due to lung disease and/or hypoxia), post-capillary PH, and combined pre- and post-capillary PH groups. For the updated definition, PH was classified as mPAP >20 mmHg and further divided into the different groups. We validated our findings in the DETECT cohort.ResultsBetween 2005 and March 2019, 268 RHCs were performed in this single-centre cohort. Using the prior definition, 137 (51%) were diagnosed with PH, with 89 classified as pre-capillary PH (56 with PAH and 33 with PH due to lung disease and/or hypoxia), 29 as post-capillary PH, and 19 as combined pre- and post-capillary PH. When the updated definition was applied to the cohort, seven out of 131 (5%) with no PH were reclassified to pre-capillary PH (PAH (n=1), PH due to lung disease (n=3) and post-capillary PH (n=3)). In those with mPAP 21–24 mmHg, with no left heart or significant lung disease, one out of 28 (4%) in our cohort and four out of 36 (11%) in the DETECT cohort were reclassified as PAH.ConclusionThe updated PH definition does not appear to have a significant impact on the diagnosis of PH in two different screening cohorts.

Objective. Pegloticase is used for the treatment of severe gout, but its use is limited by immunogenicity. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prolongs the efficacy of pegloticase.Methods. Participants were randomized 3:1 to receive 1,000 mg MMF twice daily or placebo for 14 weeks, starting 2 weeks before receiving pegloticase and continuing while receiving intravenous pegloticase 8 mg biweekly for 12 weeks. Participants then received pegloticase alone from week 12 to week 24. The primary end points were the proportion of patients who sustained a serum urate level of ≤6 mg/dl at 12 weeks and the rate of adverse events (AEs). Secondary end points included 24-week durability of serum urate level ≤6 mg/dl. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's 2-sample test were used for analyses, along with Kaplan-Meier estimates and log rank tests.Results. A total of 32 participants received ≥1 dose of pegloticase. Participants were predominantly men (88%), with a mean age of 55.2 years, mean gout duration of 13.4 years, and mean baseline serum urate level of 9.2 mg/dl. At 12 weeks, a serum urate level of ≤6 mg/dl was achieved in 19 (86%) of 22 participants in the MMF arm compared to 4 (40%) of 10 in the placebo arm (P = 0.01). At week 24, the serum urate level was ≤6 mg/dl in 68% of MMF-treated patients versus 30% of placebo-treated patients (P = 0.06), and rates of AEs were similar between groups, with more infusion reactions occurring in the placebo arm (30% versus 0%). Conclusion.Our findings indicate that MMF therapy with pegloticase is well tolerated and shows a clinically meaningful improvement in targeted serum urate level of ≤6 mg/dl at 12 and 24 weeks. This study suggests an innovative approach to pegloticase therapy in gout.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03303989.