The coronavirus causing the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, uses −1 programmed ribosomal frameshifting (−1 PRF) to control the relative expression of viral proteins. As modulating −1 PRF can inhibit viral replication, the RNA pseudoknot stimulating −1 PRF may be a fruitful target for therapeutics treating COVID-19. We modeled the unusual 3-stem structure of the stimulatory pseudoknot of SARS-CoV-2 computationally, using multiple blind structural prediction tools followed by μs-long molecular dynamics simulations. The results were compared for consistency with nuclease-protection assays and single-molecule force spectroscopy measurements of the SARS-CoV-1 pseudoknot, to determine the most likely conformations. We found several possible conformations for the SARS-CoV-2 pseudoknot, all having an extended stem 3 but with different packing of stems 1 and 2. Several conformations featured rarely-seen threading of a single strand through junctions formed between two helices. These structural models may help interpret future experiments and support efforts to discover ligands inhibiting −1 PRF in SARS-CoV-2.

The coronavirus causing the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, uses −1 programmed ribosomal frameshifting (−1 PRF) to control the relative expression of viral proteins. As modulating −1 PRF can inhibit viral replication, the RNA pseudoknot stimulating −1 PRF may be a fruitful target for therapeutics treating COVID-19. We modeled the unusual 3stem structure of the stimulatory pseudoknot of SARS-CoV-2 computationally, using multiple blind structural prediction tools followed by μs-long molecular dynamics simulations. The results were compared for consistency with nuclease-protection assays and single-molecule force spectroscopy measurements of the SARS-CoV-1 pseudoknot, to determine the most likely conformations. We found several possible conformations for the SARS-CoV-2 pseudoknot, all having an extended stem 3 but with different packing of stems 1 and 2. Several conformations featured rarely-seen threading of a single strand through the junction formed between two helices. These structural models may help interpret future experiments and support efforts to discover ligands inhibiting −1 PRF in SARS-CoV-2.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive and deadly brain tumor, portending a median 13-month survival even following gross total resection with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This prognosis necessitates improved therapies for the disease. A target of interest for novel chemotherapies is the Warburg Effect, which describes the tumor’s shift away from oxidative phosphorylation towards glycolysis. Here, we elucidate GLUT1 (Glucose transporter 1) and one of its associated binding partners, TUBB4 (Tubulin 4), as potentially druggable targets in GBM. Using data mining approach, we demonstrate that GLUT1 is overexpressed as a function of tumor grade in astrocytoma’s and that its overexpression is associated with poorer prognosis. Using both mass spectrometry performed on hGBM (human glioblastoma patient specimen) and in silico modeling, we show that GLUT1 interacts with TUBB4, and more accurately demonstrates GLUT1’s binding with fasentin. Proximity ligation assay (PLA) and immunoprecipitation studies confirm GLUT1 interaction with TUBB4. Treatment of GSC33 and GSC28 cells with TUBB4 inhibitor, CR-42-24, reduces the expression of GLUT1 however, TUBB4 expression is unaltered upon fasentin treatment. Using human pluripotent stem cell antibody array, we demonstrate reduced levels of Oct3/4, Nanog, Sox2, Sox17, Snail and VEGFR2 (Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2) upon CR-42-24 treatment. Overall, our data confirm that silencing TUBB4 or GLUT1 reduce GSC tumorsphere formation, self-renewal and proliferation in vitro. These findings suggest GLUT1 and its binding partner TUBB4 as druggable targets that warrant further investigation in GBM.

The transcription factor p53 is a potent tumor suppressor dubbed as the “guardian of the genome” because of its ability to orchestrate protective biological outputs in response to a variety of oncogenic stresses. Mutation and thus inactivation of p53 can be found in 50% of human tumors. The majority are missense mutations located in the DNA binding region. Among them, G245S is known to be a structural hotspot mutation. To understand the behaviors and differences between the wild-type and mutant, both a dimer of the wild type p53 (wt-p53) and its G245S mutant (G245S-mp53), complexed with DNA, were simulated using molecular dynamics for more than 1 μs. wt-p53 and G245S-mp53 apo monomers were simulated for 1 μs as well. Conformational analyses and binding energy evaluations performed underline important differences and therefore provide insights to understand the G245S-mp53 loss of function. Our results indicate that the G245S mutation destabilizes several structural regions in the protein that are crucial for DNA binding when found in its apo form and highlight differences in the mutant-DNA complex structure compared to the wt protein. These findings not only provide means that can be applied to other p53 mutants but also serve as structural basis for further studies aimed at the development of cancer therapies based on restoring the function of p53.

One of the most important tumor suppressor proteins in eukaryotic cells is the transcription factor called p53. The importance of this protein in cells comes from the fact that it regulates a wide variety of cellular processes including the cell cycle, metabolism, DNA repair, senescence and apoptosis. In cancer cells, p53 is a major target as the most mutated protein, which has led to the search for potential activators of the mutant protein. Currently, the only mutated-p53 activator in clinical trials is a small molecule called APR-246. There is evidence that the active metabolite of APR-246 binds covalently to mutant p53 and restores its wild-type (wt) activity. In this work, we created atomistic in silico models of the wt, mutant and drugged mutant p53 proteins each in complex with DNA. Using molecular dynamics simulations we generated equilibrated models of the complexes. Detailed analysis revealed that the binding of the APR-246 active metabolite to the mutant proteins alters their interaction with DNA. In particular, the binding of the molecule at loop L1 of the protein allows the loop to anchor the protein to DNA similarly to wt p53. Several important p53-DNA interactions lost due to mutation were also restored in the drugged mutants. These findings, not only provide a possible mechanism of action of this drug, but also criteria to use in virtual screening campaigns for other p53 activators.