In vitro activity of cefiderocol against ceftazidime-avibactam susceptible and resistant KPC-producing Enterobacterales: cross-resistance and synergistic effects --Manuscript Draft--Manuscript Number: EJCM-D-21-00999R2 Full Title: In vitro activity of cefiderocol against ceftazidime-avibactam susceptible and resistant KPC-producing Enterobacterales: cross-resistance and synergistic effects Article Type:
In this study, we designed and developed novel poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL)-based biomaterials, for use as bone scaffolds, through modification with both biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP), to impart bioactive/bioresorbable properties, and with silver nitrate, to provide antibacterial protection against Staphylococcus aureus, a microorganism involved in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) showed that the samples were characterized by square-shaped macropores, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis confirmed the presence of PCL and BCP phases, while inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) established the release of Ag+ in the medium (~0.15–0.8 wt% of initial Ag content). Adhesion assays revealed a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in both adherent and planktonic staphylococci on the Ag-functionalized biomaterials, and the presence of an inhibition halo confirmed Ag release from enriched samples. To assess the potential outcome in promoting bone integration, preliminary tests on sarcoma osteogenic-2 (Saos-2) cells indicated PCL and BCP/PCL biocompatibility, but a reduction in viability was observed for Ag-added biomaterials. Due to their combined biodegrading and antimicrobial properties, the silver-enriched BCP/PCL-based scaffolds showed good potential for engineering of bone tissue and for reducing PJIs as a microbial anti-adhesive tool used in the delivery of targeted antimicrobial molecules, even if the amount of silver needs to be tuned to improve osteointegration.
Objectives To evaluate a rapid diagnostic algorithm based on MALDI-TOF MS, lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) and molecular testing performed directly from positive blood cultures (BCs) for Gram-negative species identification and detection of CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases and main carbapenemases. Methods Non-duplicate BCs positive to Gram-negative bacteria at microscope examination were subjected to species identification by direct MALDI-TOF MS following recovery of bacterial pellet by Rapid MBT Sepsityper® kit. Subsequently, NG-Test® CARBA 5 and NG-Test® CTX-M MULTI LFIAs were performed according to identified microbial species. Eazyplex® SuperBug CRE molecular assay was performed in cases of NG-Test® CARBA 5 negative results in patients with documented carbapenemase-producers carriage. Results of rapid diagnostic workflow were compared with those obtained by conventional diagnostic routine. Results Overall, the direct MALDI-TOF MS protocol allowed reliable identification to the species level of 92.1% of the 2133 monomicrobial BCs. Rate of matched identification was significantly higher for Enterobacterales (97.3%) in comparison to non-fermenting Gram-negative species (80.2%), obligate anaerobic bacteria (42.1%) and fastidious Gram-negative species (41.5%). The overall sensitivity of NG-Test® CARBA 5 and NG-Test® CTX-M MULTI was 92.2% and 91.6%, respectively. Integration of Easyplex® SuperBug CRE allowed the detection of blaKPC mutants associated with ceftazidime/avibactam resistance, reaching 100% sensitivity in carbapenemase detection. Both LFIAs and molecular testing showed no false-positive results. Conclusions Algorithms based on MALDI-TOF MS, LFIAs and molecular testing may represent a cost-effective tool to timely identify Gram-negative species and detect resistance markers directly from BCs. According to local epidemiology, these results may allow antimicrobial stewardship interventions including prompt use of new approved drugs.
Purpose To evaluate the prevalence of multi-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (EB) and the activity of cefiderocol (CFDC), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and combinations of CZA plus aztreonam (ATM), MEV plus ATM and CFDC plus CZA against them. Methods A collection of carbapenemase-producing EB clinical isolates ( n = 1242) was investigated by lateral flow immunoassay NG-Test CARBA-5 and molecular testing. Cefiderocol MICs were determined using broth microdilution Sensititre TM panel. MICs of CZA and MEV were determined by the gradient diffusion method. Antimicrobial synergy testing was performed using gradient diffusion strip crossing. Results KPC were the most frequent carbapenemases (83.2%), followed by VIM (9.2 %), OXA-48-like (4.3 %) and NDM enzymes (4.1%). Multi-carbapenemase producers were found in 10 (0.8%) isolates. Three combinations of two different carbapenemases were observed: KPC+VIM ( n = 4), NDM+OXA-48-like ( n = 4), and VIM+OXA-48-like ( n = 2). CFDC showed potent activity against eight out of ten dual-carbapenemases producers, while resistance or reduced susceptibility was shown towards CZA and MEV. CFDC in combination with CZA showed no synergistic effects and only two additive effects on seven (87.5%) of the CFDC-susceptible strains. Conversely, CZA plus ATM and MEV plus ATM combinations were synergistic against all ATM-resistant strains regardless of dual-carbapenemases phenotype. Conclusions The occurrence of multi-carbapenemase producers is not uncommon in Northern Italy area. MEV in combination with ATM might be considered as a potential therapeutic option, alternative to CZA plus ATM. CFDC susceptibility testing and synergy evaluation of ATM-based combinations should be performed in the lab routine to evaluate the most in vitro active antimicrobial regimen.
A significant challenge in orthopedics is the design of biomaterial devices that are able to perform biological functions by substituting or repairing various tissues and controlling bone repair when required. This review presents an overview of the current state of our recent research into biomaterial modifications to reduce bacterial adhesive ability, compared with previous reviews and excellent research papers, but it is not intended to be exhaustive. In particular, we investigated biomaterials for replacement, such as metallic materials (titanium and titanium alloys) and polymers (ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene), and biomaterials for regeneration, such as poly(ε-caprolactone) and calcium phosphates as composites. Biomaterials have been designed, developed, and characterized to define surface/bulk features; they have also been subjected to bacterial adhesion assays to verify their potential capability to counteract infections. The addition of metal ions (e.g., silver), natural antimicrobial compounds (e.g., essential oils), or antioxidant agents (e.g., vitamin E) to different biomaterials conferred strong antibacterial properties and anti-adhesive features, improving their capability to counteract prosthetic joint infections and biofilm formation, which are important issues in orthopedic surgery. The complexity of biological materials is still far from being reached by materials science through the development of sophisticated biomaterials. However, close interdisciplinary work by materials scientists, engineers, microbiologists, chemists, physicists, and orthopedic surgeons is indeed necessary to modify the structures of biomaterials in order to achieve implant integration and tissue regeneration while avoiding microbial contamination.
Accurate detection of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales from bloodstream infection (BSI) is of paramount importance for both epidemiological and clinical purposes, especially for optimization of antibiotic stewardship interventions. Three phenotypic methods for the detection of ESBL phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli BSI were compared over a 4-month period (May-August 2021) in a main University Hospital from Northern Italy. The methods were the biochemical Rapid ESBL NP®, the immunological NG-Test CTX-M MULTI®, and the E-test technique based on ESBL E-test®. One hundred forty-two blood cultures (BCs) positive for K. pneumoniae or E. coli were included. ESBL and carbapenemase phenotype were detected in 26.1% (n = 37) and 16.9% (n = 24), respectively. The Rapid ESBL NP®, NG-Test CTX-M MULTI®, and direct ESBL E-test® positive and negative predictive values with 95% confidence intervals were 1 (0.87-1) and 0.97 (0.92-0.99), 1 (0.87-1) and 0.97 (0.92-0.99), and 1 (0.88-1) and 1 (0.96-1), respectively. The three phenotypic methods evaluated showed good performance in the detection of ESBL phenotype from K. pneumoniae-or E. coli-positive BCs. Rapid ESBL NP® and NG-test CTX-M® offer the important advantage of a turnaround time of 15 to 45 min, and the Rapid ESBL NP test in addition detects any type of ESBL producers.
Herein we assessed the frequency of Gram-negative organisms causing bloodstream infections and activity spectrum of ceftolozane-tazobactam (CTZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), cefiderocol (CFDC) and comparators. Overall, 1605 Gram-negative isolates were consecutively collected during 2019-2021. Enterobacterales represented more than 75% and exhibited >90% susceptibility to CZA (97%), amikacin (91.8%) and meropenem (90.6%). ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates showed high rates of susceptibility towards CZA (100%), carbapenems (89.1-100%) and CTZ (84.9-95.1%). MEV displayed the highest activity against KPC-producing Enterobacterales (MIC 50/90 , 0.75/4 mg/L; 92.9% susceptible) followed by CZA (MIC 50/90 , 2/>8 mg/L; 89.3% susceptible), CFDC (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/4 mg/L, 87.5% susceptible) and colistin (MIC 50/90 , 2/4 mg/L, 83.9% susceptible). High proportions of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to colistin (97.8%), CZA (97.2%), CTZ (96.1%) and amikacin (94.5%). CFDC showed potent activity against Acinetobacter baumannii (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/1 mg/L; 97.2% susceptible), multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/1 mg/L; 96% susceptible), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 mg/L; 100% susceptible).
Biomedical implants, an essential part of the medical treatments, still suffer from bacterial infections that hamper patients’ recovery and lives. Antibiotics are widely used to cure those infections but brought antibiotic resistance. Essential oils (EOs) demonstrate excellent antimicrobial activity and low resistance development risk. However, EO application in medicine is still quite scarce and almost no research work considers its use in combination with bioresorbable biomaterials, such as the poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) polymer. This work aimed to combine the antibacterial properties of EOs and their components, particularly eugenol and cinnamon oil, against Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis and Escherichia coli, with those of PCL for medical applications in which good tissue regeneration and antimicrobial effects are required. The PCL porous scaffolds, added with increasing (from 30% to 50%) concentrations of eugenol and cinnamon oil, were characterized by square-shaped macropores. Saos-2 cells’ cell viability/proliferation was hampered by 40 and 50% EO-enriched PCL, whereas no cytotoxic effect was recorded for both 30% EO-added PCL and pure-PCL. The antibacterial tests revealed the presence of a small inhibition halo around the 30% eugenol and cinnamon oil-functionalized PCL scaffolds only for staphylococci, whereas a significant decrease on both adherent and planktonic bacteria was recorded for all the three microorganisms, thus proving that, even if the EOs are only in part released by the EO-added PCL scaffolds, an anti-adhesive feature is anyway achieved. The scaffold will have the ability to support new tissue formation and simultaneously will be able to prevent post-surgical infection. This research shows the great potential in the use of EOs or their single components, at low concentrations, for biomaterial functionalization with enhanced anti-bacterial and biointegration properties.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.