No abstract

No abstract

OBJECTIVES Health educational interventions improve health outcomes and quality of life in children with asthma. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an education intervention for an asthma inhaler technique during hospital admission for an asthma exacerbation. METHODS This prospective study was conducted in a pediatric hospitalization unit of a third-level hospital. Children admitted for an asthma exacerbation were eligible for inclusion. It was developed in 2 phases: during hospital admission (T1) and 1 month after discharge (T2). In the T1 phase, caregivers completed the questionnaire to assess asthma control in children (CAN questionnaire) and performed the inhaler technique, which was evaluated with a 6-step checklist. An educational intervention was performed. In the T2 phase, caregivers completed the CAN questionnaire, and the inhaler technique was reevaluated. We hypothesized that the inhaler technique improved after the implementation of an asthma education program. RESULTS A total of 101 children were included, of whom 85 completed the T2 phase (84%). At baseline, 11.8% of participants performed the inhaler technique correctly. All steps of the inhaler technique upgraded in the T2 phase significantly (P < .01), except for the step “assemble the inhaler device correctly.” Former evaluation by a pediatric pneumologist was associated with a higher score in the inhaler technique in the T1 phase. The median CAN questionnaire score in the T1 phase was 8 (interquartile range 4–16), which reduced to 4 (interquartile range 1.2–6) in the T2 phase (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS The development of an educational intervention during admission improved inhaler technique as well as asthma knowledge.

Background and objectives: Based on previous studies revealing acid-suppression medication as a risk factor for food allergy tolerance induction, we aimed to establish the importance of those findings in patients undergoing oral immunotherapy (OIT).Materials and methods, results: We describe a case series of four patients who underwent milk OIT with a concomitant use of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication and who developed anaphylaxis after a known, previously tolerated dose of milk.Conclusions: PPIs may act as a cofactor in patients undergoing OIT, triggering adverse reac-tions, irrespective of the PPI used or the dosage. It would be necessary to separate the admin-istration of drug from food intake.Since OIT is a new form of treatment, long-term adverse events arising from PPI treatment and other possible triggers are still uncertain. Consequently, monitoring of patient must be prolonged over time. Additional investigations on the influence of different drugs in OIT main-tenance phase are required.

Objective. To describe the epidemiological characteristics, hospital follow-up, and course of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal atresia and its consequences on lung function. Population and methods. Retrospective, longitudinal, and analytical study. The medical records of patients with esophageal atresia born between 1996 and 2017 were reviewed. Perinatal data, type of atresia, associated malformations, respiratory and gastrointestinal complications, and spirometry data were recorded over 3 years. Results. A total of 97 patients were included. The most common type of atresia was III, and the most frequent syndrome, trisomy 21; 13.4 % of patients died in the neonatal period; 23.8 % were followed up by the Department of Pulmonology, and their respiratory complications included exacerbations (46.4 %), wheezing or asthma (36 %), and pneumonia (26.8 %). Gastroesophageal reflux was a risk factor for wheezing (OR: 5.31; p = 0.002), exacerbations (OR: 4.00; p = 0.009), and pneumonia (OR: 3.24; p = 0.02). In the first spirometry (n = 20), the pattern was normal in 65 %; restrictive in 30 %; and mixed in 5 %. In the second spirometry (n = 19), the pattern was normal in 42.1 %; restrictive in 31.6 %; obstructive in 15.8 %, and mixed in 10.5 %. In the third spirometry (n = 14), the pattern was normal in 50 %; restrictive in 21.4 %; obstructive in 14.3 %, and mixed in 14.3 %. Conclusions. In our sample of patients, a large proportion had respiratory and gastrointestinal comorbidities. Lung function worsened progressively.

No abstract

RESUMEN Objetivo. Describir las características epidemiológicas, el seguimiento hospitalario y la evolución de los pacientes intervenidos por atresia esofágica y su repercusión en la función pulmonar. Población y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo, longitudinal y analítico. Se revisaron las historias clínicas de pacientes con atresia esofágica nacidos entre 1996 y 2017. Se registraron datos perinatales, tipo de atresia, malformaciones asociadas, complicaciones respiratorias y digestivas, y los datos espirométricos durante tres años. Resultados. Se incluyeron 97 pacientes. El tipo de atresia más frecuente fue el III y el síndrome más frecuente, la trisomía 21. El 13,4 % fallecieron en el período neonatal. El 23,8 % de los pacientes estuvo en seguimiento por Neumología y presentó como complicaciones respiratorias exacerbaciones (el 46,4 %), sibilancias o asma (el 36 %), neumonías (el 26,8 %). El reflujo gastroesofágico fue factor de riesgo de sibilancias (OR 5,31; p = 0,002), exacerbaciones (OR 4,00; p = 0,009) y neumonías (OR 3,24; p = 0,02). En la primera espirometría (n = 20), un 65 % presentaba patrón normal; un 30 %, restrictivo, y un 5 %, mixto. En la segunda espirometría (n = 19), un 42,1 % presentaba patrón normal; un 31,6 %, restrictivo; un 15,8 %, obstructivo, y un 10,5 %, mixto. En la tercera espirometría (n = 14), el 50 % presentaba un patrón espirométrico normal; el 21,4 %, restrictivo; el 14,3 %, obstructivo, y un 14,3 %, mixto. Conclusiones. En nuestra muestra de pacientes, una importante proporción presentó comorbilidades respiratorias y digestivas. La función pulmonar empeoró progresivamente. Palabras clave: atresia esofágica, pruebas de función respiratoria, niños, estudios de seguimiento, comorbilidad.

In conclusion, we present the case of a 23-month-old boy with severe recurrent respiratory exacerbations associated with Rhinovirus infection. Thorough testing ruled out known risk factors such as congenital anomalies, immune deficiency or coinfections. A genetic analysis was performed, which failed to determine the presence of known genetic determinants of human RV susceptibility. There are few studies regarding the possible genetic mutations which increase the risk of severe respiratory exacerbations and respiratory failure secondary to viral infections, especially those involving human RV. A deeper understanding of these mutations would improve our knowledge and help identify at-risk patients with similar phenotypes to our case.