The Conowingo, Safe Harbor, and Holtwood dams located on the Lower Susquehanna River have historically acted as a system of sediment and nutrient pollution traps, retaining and thereby preventing large amounts of ecologically harmful sediment from entering the Upper Chesapeake Bay. However, extreme storm events, termed as scouring events, cause substantial amounts of the trapped sediment to be swept downriver into the Upper Chesapeake Bay, blanketing benthic organisms, affecting subaquatic vegetation growth, and the overall water quality.In addition, all three reservoirs have reached a state of near maximum sediment storage capacity termed as dynamic equilibrium. Based on prior research, this study seeks to reduce the sediment buildup in the LSR Dams through a continuous sediment removal and processing system, and thereby reduce the ecological impact of major scouring events. A set of scour performance curves derived from a regression analysis, and a stochastic lifecycle cost model were used to evaluate the sediment scouring reduction and economic feasibility of three processing alternatives: Plasma Vitrification, Cement-Lock, and Quarry/Landfill, and three removal amount cases: Nominal, Moderate, and Maximum. Since the scour performance curves treat the dams as static, a fluid system dynamics model was used to determine if there is a dynamic interaction between the capacitance of the dams during major scouring events. A utility vs. cost analysis factoring in time, performance, and suitability of the alternatives indicates that a Cement-Lock processing plant at nominal and moderate dredging is the most costperformance effective solution.
A series of three major dams and reservoirs located along the Lower Susquehanna River have historically acted as a system of sediment and nutrient pollution traps. However, episodic pulses of these pollution loads are released following short-term extreme storm events, affecting subaquatic vegetation, benthic organisms, and the overall water quality in the Upper Chesapeake Bay. In addition, all three reservoirs have reached a state of near maximum storage capacity termed as dynamic equilibrium. Based on prior research, this study seeks to reduce the sediment buildup behind the dams through a sediment removal and processing operation, and thereby reduce the ecological impact of major storms. A set of scour performance curves derived from a regression analysis, and a stochastic lifecycle cost model were used to evaluate the sediment scouring reduction and economic feasibility of three processing alternatives: Plasma Vitrification, Cement-Lock, and Quarry/Landfill, and three removal amount cases: Nominal, Moderate, and Maximum. Since the scour performance curves treat the dams as static, a fluid system dynamics model was used to determine if the dynamic interaction between the capacitance of the dams during major scouring events is negligible or considerable. A utility vs. cost analysis factoring in time, performance, and suitability of the alternatives indicates that a Cement-Lock processing plant at moderate dredging for the Safe Harbor and Conowingo Dams is the most cost-performance effective solution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.